I guess we will have to agree to disagree as I assume you want us to buy 100m£ players and give them 400k a week and risk bank rupting the club and changing the ethos and philosophy AP and Enic are trying to build?
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Management ENIC
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
1 or 2 if the manager wants them to add experience to the youth, yes.
Bankrupt the club LOL.
We signed a load of them last Summer!
So just because we haven't bought a couple of 100m£ players and given them 250-350k a week you want ENIC out. Bit strong init? Plus that would screw up how Ange's wants to build the squad!!
Did you just call Levy a great man!!
He also calls him Dad
I think we've got Donna Cullen in the house
No. That’s one reason, but it’s secondary to the inability to set a culture and winning strategy throughout the club. The lack leadership and continued flaws from the CEO are why I want Levy gone. I can live with Lewis / non investment / self generating policy but the bigger flaw is that that strange little man and his continued errors. He’s not qualified for the role - one trick pony, retail finance director
Your opinion and fair enough. Good debate
He has been sent here by the great Levy himself to slowly, but surely, drive people back into his arms by boring folks to the point where they turn into Levy lovers out of spite.
People are obsessed with transfer fees, I’m not. I do think there are times we should overpay for certain players regardless of the perceived value - if we are short and the manager wants them. Again, this should be a deviation and not the norm. Levy has cost us good players previously and I don’t think he’s learnt from itYour opinion and fair enough. Good debate
Completely accept that, but imo on balance by far he has done more good for the club than not. To this day I still berate him for not backing Poch when we all knew it was necessary for the club to progress to the next level.
The good is good but the not doesn’t look likely to change - he’s got a blind spot. He’s a finance man and needs someone bold next to him, to challenge his thinking and push at times
the not doesn’t look likely to change. This is where we differ. Naively or not I now think with the additional revenue created from the stadium and Ange hopefully convincing all of us, including and mainly Enic. that he is the man to take us forward, we will see bigger investment on the pitch. Why? Because again potentially naively, I think this was the blueprint plan all along and were almost there and just waiting for the right man (Ange?) to be trusted to complete the plan.
Speak English, child
Fingers crossed
Think it’s more likely under the right man and I do Ange is quite flexible and more open to options rather than Poch etc who seemed to dig in for his first choices
Never you mind what I say, young man
Just focus on the fact you're getting cooked in a Levy debate...once again