• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management ENIC

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

ENIC In or ENIC Out


  • Total voters
    209
So basically Levy has had to roll his neck in and go back to how the club was being run regarding football things before the new stadium was built. For whatever reason the club has been incapable of using the new stadium to become one of the most successful clubs in Europe. Which was the goal that Levy himself announced. Apparently (according to the Chairman's statement) in the club's Financial Results Year Ended 30th June 2024, which were publicised March this year, £700m has been spent on player acquisitions since April 2019 when the new stadium was opened which would have been from the summer transfer window later that year.

I can't think of many players signed that the supporters have been particularly happy with, Micky Van de Ven, maybe Perisic, I don't know who else. Maddison, Kulusevski, Bentancur are good on their day but all three are inconsistent. Johnson has poached a few goals by ghosting in at the far post but he's a fairly crap wide player. Reguilon and Doherty pleeeease!! Bissouma a few good games but he wound't be missed. PEH alright but limited, lots of supporters wanted rid. Sanchez, Clark, Sessegnon pfft. Vicario good shot stopper but panics with crosses and flaps to the degree that opposition teams target him, and he was signed because Levy didn't want to pay the price for Raya. Locelso, I could see he wan't going to work out during his loan but the club still signed him at a fairly high value, Werner!!. Sarr, Okay so far but nothing special, Udogie, alright I suppose but gets done on 1v1s too often. Porro improved towards the end of last season but was a liability before that, Romero, can be very good when he feels like it. Richarlison, scored 13 goals one season IIRC, Solanke might score more goals if the wide players weren't so crap.

Mourinho sacked just prior to League Cup final. replaced until the season's end by Mason, who selected his mates to play.
Nuno Espírito Santo was treated like shit by the club and expected make the team play alternatively to his own style that had worked for him at Wolves, because Levy had made an end of season statement about the next manager playing attacking flowing football. Spurs DNA ,,,
Conte never really wanted to be at Spurs and thought he was above the role, lived in a hotel so he could easily pack his bags and fuck off, after telling the world about the lack of ambition of the club.
Postecoglou, just wanted to attack until he realised his second season prophecy was at risk.

But apart from that it's all hunky dory.

Yup, pretty much what I've been saying...
 
Last edited:
Except one of them actually helped us to a trophy, which Kane failed to do on several occasions
Oh My God Wow GIF
 
Why do people have to make up toxic shit. Just go and support another club if you hate it that much

Spurs fans feel the need to play their position on social media, we get punched down on by rival fans and the media so much that the fanbase has low self esteem therefore they project their insecurities back onto the club so everything gets twisted and painted into a negative and thus if the inevitable was to happen they are already in a position to accept fate.

No-one does self loathing and he need to constantly wallow in self pity like our fans, it's probably why you'll get called a 'happy clapper' if you dare to be slightly positive

It feels like a certain section of our fanbase – albeit a loud minority – are determined to be outraged at everything the club does. There's this constant negativity, almost like they're performing for an audience, treating every decision with maximum cynicism and acting like entitled critics of every move Spurs make.

What’s worse is some of them seem to embrace the "Spursy" label like it's a badge of honour — wearing it around their neck like some sort of war medal. It’s as if they've given up believing in the club entirely. Instead of supporting the team, they’d rather mock it or wallow in this self-inflicted misery. It's honestly baffling how some fans seem more committed to being miserable than hopeful.
 
If anything people are defending anti bullshit and pushing back against the OTT hysterical crap that gets written in here.

These guys know they are, it's just if they actually say they get it then they have very little else to talk about, so they pretend they don't understand and just accuse people of being levy lovers and openly fantasise about other posters performing sexual acts on the great bald one.
 
Last edited:
These guys know they are, its just if they actually say they get it then they have very little else to talk about so they pretend they don't understand and just accuse people of being lovers and openly fantasise about other posters performing sexual acts on the great bald one.

The thing is they don't like it when people push back, they call it 'defending' the board - they want this place to be an echo chamber but as far as I recall this has always been a neutral thread and it will always be one.

They ought to start their own 'I hate ENIC' or 'Levy is a bald cunt' thread or something like that if that's the case but I absolutely guarantee you they won't because they'd have no-one to troll or bait and eventually get tired of their own voices, they'll all end up running back in here.
 
If you're comparing the period which was before the stadium opened to now then what the fuck has 'every other club' got to do with the point being made?

We are comparing against ourselves not what other clubs were doing.

Go and look up the amount of money spent pre stadium build to what we have spent since, it's there in black and white and it's more than obvious that we are now spending money because of the increase in revenue.

Anyway the point is that what Levy said is correct, it has created revenues to allow us to invest in the team, as I keep saying the execution surrounding it with the lack of direction is the problem.
I'm with Dan here. The stadium HAS been a game changer. It's just that we don't spend wisely.

I saw a list(you can probably google it) about half-a-year ago, that we were 3rd in europe(if not world) in transfer fees paid the last 3 seasons.

Thats pretty telling. It says we spend big on transfer fees, and it says we really suck at it.

We tend to spend a lot on a lot of mediocre players, and nothing at all on a few game changers.

And this is NOT a defending Levy post!
 
Last edited:
The thing is they don't like it when people push back, they call it 'defending' the board - they want this place to be an echo chamber but as far as I recall this has always been a neutral thread and it will always be one.

They ought to start their own 'I hate ENIC' or 'Levy is a bald cunt' thread or something like that if that's the case but I absolutely guarantee you they won't because they'd have no-one to troll or bait and eventually get tired of their own voices, they'll all end up running back in here.

I think mostly just like posting on the forum and wouldn't have much else to say if it wasn't about Levy.
 
Spurs fans feel the need to play their position on social media, we get punched down on by rival fans and the media so much that the fanbase has low self esteem therefore they project their insecurities back onto the club so everything gets twisted and painted into a negative and thus if the inevitable was to happen they are already in a position to accept fate.

No-one does self loathing and he need to constantly wallow in self pity like our fans, it's probably why you'll get called a 'happy clapper' if you dare to be slightly positive

It feels like a certain section of our fanbase – albeit a loud minority – are determined to be outraged at everything the club does. There's this constant negativity, almost like they're performing for an audience, treating every decision with maximum cynicism and acting like entitled critics of every move Spurs make.

What’s worse is some of them seem to embrace the "Spursy" label like it's a badge of honour — wearing it around their neck like some sort of war medal. It’s as if they've given up believing in the club entirely. Instead of supporting the team, they’d rather mock it or wallow in this self-inflicted misery. It's honestly baffling how some fans seem more committed to being miserable than hopeful.

I'm trying to picture it in another forum, like an Ipswich one.
"We're shit, we're skint, and we're going to get relegated. I don't know why anyone accepts this colossal shitfest"

Or even Brentford
"Every time we get a good player Benham will just sell them, so what's the point. Still paying championship wages. Lose our best manager in decades and replace him on the cheap"

It's amazing how far Man Utd have fallen from what they were, and their fans aren't even a patch on how much negativity threads like this have generated for decades. There are people supporting the club as adults under 24 now who have never known a lower-table spurs, so to an extent I can understand why they could take it for granted, but for anyone who was around and supporting in the 90s at least... is that somehow seen as better? Or the 80s? I mean, has the club ever had what could be considered "good" ownership before 2001? Seems like people are unhappy because they are comparing us to unobtanium like an Abramovich, Qatar, or Abu Dhabi, who have ulterior motives.
 
When we were told the stadium was a game changer, I believed it. I thought it meant huge revenues and more money than ever being spent on the team.

Whilst that’s true to an extent, it’s certainly not lived up to the billing in my head at the time.

Got me thinking about other clubs that had any success in the years following a stadium move. Are there any? That lot along the road are just getting their shit together now and their hovel has been open almost 20 years. Did I underestimate how tough moving to a new stadium would be? Did Levy? Did we all?
 
When we were told the stadium was a game changer, I believed it. I thought it meant huge revenues and more money than ever being spent on the team.

Whilst that’s true to an extent, it’s certainly not lived up to the billing in my head at the time.

Got me thinking about other clubs that had any success in the years following a stadium move. Are there any? That lot along the road are just getting their shit together now and their hovel has been open almost 20 years. Did I underestimate how tough moving to a new stadium would be? Did Levy? Did we all?

Well, we did have a global economic issue that fucked a lot that stuff up. About typical that it would coincide, let's be honest.

Here's the difference in the transfer spending before and after the new stadium, based on transfermarkt.

14/15 until 19/20 (6 seasons inclusive) we had the 17th highest net spend. Per season is approx €80m of which €17m net

Should be able to click to enlarge
image-2025-06-25-140837251.png


20/21 to 24/25 (5 seasons inclusive) we have 3rd highest net spend Per season is approx €170m of which €116m net.

image-2025-06-25-135410541.png



So the net spend has gone up 10x per season. From a squad point of view, we're outspending Man City, Liverpool, Woolwich, and the PIF.
 
Last edited:
I thing Levy has taken us as far as he can & would be delighted if he sold up, however, I'm getting the right hump with the "supposed to be Spurs fans" cunts that are trying to belittle our Europa Cup win just a fucking month ago. Youse sound like those gutted little cunts up the road, who for 17 years (alongside most other football fans) have been giving it to us , "Spursy,where's your trophy's etc". I took my 3 teenagers to the parade, it was real & ABSOLUTELY meant something to the true/ real/ proper fans of this beautiful Club. You cunts trying to make out it's fuck all are either trolls, gooners or just complete and utter wankstains in my very honest opinion,not worth it.
TTID
 
When we were told the stadium was a game changer, I believed it. I thought it meant huge revenues and more money than ever being spent on the team.
According to the Chairman's statement which appeared at the bottom of the club's Financial Results Year Ended 30th June 2024 publication from March this year; the club has spent £700m on player acquisitions since the new stadium was opened.

IMO that money has been spent so poorly that surely it amounts to incompetence, and it's even worse when Ndombele and Aurier are added but they arrived sometime before the new stadium was open (I think, without checking) so that's another £85m down the swanny.

I know it's not likely that every signing is going to work out well for a football team, some you win, some you lose, I'm struggling to think which are the one's the club won. So far it's Van de ven, possibly Perisic. some of the other players I would describe as good on their day but inconsistent, so not really all that good altogether. Certainly no game changers in attack.

I don't see why it's so unpopular with some posters on the forum to have this sort of stuff discussed?
 
Last edited:
According to the Chairman's statement which appeared at the bottom of the club's Financial Results Year Ended 30th June 2024 publication from March this year; the club has spent £700m on player acquisitions since the new stadium was opened.

IMO that money has been spent so poorly that surely it amounts to incompetence, and it's even worse when Ndombele and Aurier are added but they arrived sometime before the new stadium was open (I think, without checking) so that's another £85m down the swanny.

I know it's not likely that every signing is going to work out well for a football team, some you win, some you lose, I'm struggling to think which are the one's the club won. So far it's Van de ven, possibly Perisic. some of the other players I would describe as good on their day but inconsistent, so not really all that good altogether. Certainly no game changers in attack.

I don't see why it's so unpopular with some posters on the forum to have this sort of stuff discussed?

The club has failed the players IMO, we sign good players but there's been no sign of coaching to improve them over the past few years since funnily enough Poch left, I made a long detailed post about this in another thread:


Our recruitment wouldn't look half as bad if we actually stuck to a plan.
 
Well, we did have a global economic issue that fucked a lot that stuff up. About typical that it would coincide, let's be honest.

Here's the difference in the transfer spending before and after the new stadium, based on transfermarkt.

14/15 until 19/20 (6 seasons inclusive) we had the 17th highest net spend. Per season is approx €80m of which €17m net

Should be able to click to enlarge
image-2025-06-25-140837251.png


20/21 to 24/25 (5 seasons inclusive) we have 3rd highest net spend Per season is approx €170m of which €116m net.

image-2025-06-25-135410541.png



So the net spend has gone up 10x per season. From a squad point of view, we're outspending Man City, Liverpool, Woolwich, and the PIF.

Pretty stark change to be fair.

According to the Chairman's statement which appeared at the bottom of the club's Financial Results Year Ended 30th June 2024 publication from March this year; the club has spent £700m on player acquisitions since the new stadium was opened.

IMO that money has been spent so poorly that surely it amounts to incompetence, and it's even worse when Ndombele and Aurier are added but they arrived sometime before the new stadium was open (I think, without checking) so that's another £85m down the swanny.

I know it's not likely that every signing is going to work out well for a football team, some you win, some you lose, I'm struggling to think which are the one's the club won. So far it's Van de ven, possibly Perisic. some of the other players I would describe as good on their day but inconsistent, so not really all that good altogether. Certainly no game changers in attack.

I don't see why it's so unpopular with some posters on the forum to have this sort of stuff discussed?
Don’t think discussing is unpopular. Just think you may find it to not be great when people disagree with you.

As long as posters go into any discussion in good faith, don’t tell outright lies, accept they may get called out if they are presenting opinion as fact and most importantly, accept they are unlikely to change anyone’s mind on any subject, discussion is welcomed, or we wouldn’t be here.
 
So the net spend has gone up 10x per season. From a squad point of view, we're outspending Man City, Liverpool, Woolwich, and the PIF.
Makes it all the more incredible that we most recently finished in 17th place.

In French there's a phrase that means "When you're a fool, even gold turns to lead", it's apt for us.
 
Back
Top