I don't mind anyone posting the same or similar thing over and over, I don't see any harm in it. I suppose you'd need to ask Admin if he thinks it's damaging the forum as a whole.
As for who benefits? I imagine posters who share those views enjoy reading those posts. Though I don't think a post has to necessarily have a benefit to someone, If the team had a crap game, and posters post ''that was crap'' and the players get low ratings on the ratings thread, who does that benefit? Is THFC going to read this forum's player rating thread and make alterations due to it?
There are other posters on the forum that seem to like arguing, lots of threads on different topics on the forum are filled with prolonged arguments, quite often slanging matches, Maybe that behaviour is damaging to the forum as a whole, as it's quite often disruptive and ends with posts being moved and posters sin binned.
Again, I've 'liked' that post because I agree with your sentiment and most of what you say.
But I do think there is a big difference between the scenario you are suggesting there, and the JT style of posting. When we lose a game and play badly, it's understandable that people 'let off steam' - the difference is, those same people might well be positive when we win and play well, and they might add interesting opinions or useful content on other topics at other times. That's not the case with JT - it's 'ENIC and Levy are evil' on every thread, every day, never anything else.
I agree to a great extent with your point about arguing, with many people on this forum (irrespective of their like or dislike of Levy) seemingly unable to accept any argument that contradicts or challenges their own, and yes that is disruptive, but at least in most cases they do seem to start out with some kind of attempt to discuss (albeit often only to defend their view, with no intention of learning, developing or adapting - indeed some of the most prolific posters on here, whilst posting some good stuff from time to time, are utterly incapable of saying 'hmmm ok I see your point' - but that's symptomatic of most people generally isn't it?) I'm not saying that's ok or a good thing, but at least it does involve some kind of genuine back & forth conversation, with new points being raised - JT's posts don't (I appreciate that he doesn't have the understanding of the financial detail needed for that, but that's no excuse), they have no substance and no willingness to debate, they are the RL equivalent of a madman running around in the street with his fingers in his ears shouting the same few phrases into people's faces for hours on end, day after day.
Tbh I am in some ways surprised that Admin tolerates it, but to be fair, I think Admin expects this place to be largely self-policing, and hence lets go as much as he possibly can (and JT is very careful to never say anything that could directly result in a ban - he normally lights the touchpaper for his followers to be aggressive with, and they sometimes get banned as a result, but he is more careful than that himself), plus I'm sure Admin has enough to do already. The repetition of the same thign again and again on multiple threads could be considered a banning offence by some, but I totally agree that's arguable...
- the majority on here, even including many who would on balance rather we had new owners, recognise that you hate ENIC & Levy more than you love Spurs, and hence recognise that your 'support' has been diluted by that. Take a look in the mirror JT and be honest with yourself - admit that your obsession with ENIC / Levy has become so great that you've lost track of your interest in Spurs, and if you are honest, you actually love it when we fail, you want us to fail, as that means Levy & ENIC fail.
