• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management ENIC

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

ENIC In or ENIC Out


  • Total voters
    209
We will not know for some time as change takes time. However we no longer have Levy who is a part owner no longer controlling everything including Transfer negotiations and Executives paid to do the job that have previous experience elsewhere. They will have to perform as it is easier to replace them than it was Levy.
As to the ownership that changed a couple of years ago but it is only now that different members of the Lewis family have taken control. Will they be any better? only time will tell but Levy going is a major change.

It is such a major change for the good. How many times have we said over the last twenty years that if levy was in charge of sacking himself he’d have gone about 20 times!
 
Hinson only non-exec so won't be spending that much time at the club, apart from Dalgleish and Liverpool how many clubs have anyone with football management or playing experience on their boards?

When the next accounts are released will we still have the highest paid director in the Premier League , now Levy has gone can't see Vinae being paid over £3 mill.
 

Another appointment. Going to need a bigger boardroom table if we keep this up
Just the sort of pick me up that we've needed after a couple of disappointing performances

I shall now go into my day with a spring in my step
 
Having had time to reflect on the firing of Levy, I'm becoming a little more suspicious of the motivation of the Lewis family.
We all know the anti ENIC sentiment was rife among the fanbase. Even when not on open display it's been bubbling under the surface ready to explode. ..unrest and division was everywhere.

Now, rightly or wrongly, the focus of the anti ENIC sentiment was Daniel Levy because he was their public face. The puss filled head of the boil that the fans can actually see rather than the festering mess beneath the surface of the skin.....Levy OUT was far more prominent than ENIC OUT.

maybe the Lewis cartel think that by removing the visible target of the unrest and anger they can continue their long term strategy of scamming the fanbase while increasing the asset value until the opportune time arrives to cash in.

Maybe all the recent guff about statues being erected, wanting to win more often, cash injections etc is just a ploy to buy more time? I've already been told last week by someone close to the club a deal has already been struck to replace Frank with Poch after the world cup in an obvious attempt to enamour themselves with the fanbase.

I'll hold back on my criticism for now. But January is gonna be a massive indication of where we're heading
Yes the removing of Levy was very odd to say the least, and very shady.

And i don't think we as a fanbase should put much hope on the January window. Players of real class are never available in January.
 
It'll pay off a good portion of the transfer debt, transfers aren't made in one payment, so if the club keep getting those cash injections it means it can get better players. paying for them over a period of time, probably the length of their initial contracts.

The club can't be paying big money for more average players though. like is has been, so if anything the occasional £100m will also help pay for salaries over our usual limit. It's the way to get better players.

If it's just going to be a one off payment every 10 years or so then it's not going to achieve much. So it depends but I read an article a few weeks ago that this cash injection is just the start. I can't see where the money is going to be raised from though. Most of Lewis' money is apparently tied up in business ventures, shares, and whatnot, and it's not good business to sell any of that to spend on expensive footballers.

Apparently this £100m that has been announced is coming from manipulating shares in the club, I don't know if that can be repeated frequently.
 
Hinson only non-exec so won't be spending that much time at the club, apart from Dalgleish and Liverpool how many clubs have anyone with football management or playing experience on their boards?

When the next accounts are released will we still have the highest paid director in the Premier League , now Levy has gone can't see Vinae being paid over £3 mill.

Imagine if all of the board grouped together does?
 
Information alert - clubs can sell players when they no longer want them for their first team rather than put up with mediocrity until their contracts run out. We are probably the worst club in the PL at selling players. The inability to shift players like Ndombele, Gil and Reguillon was poor and cost us.
Aside from the cash injection where 100m is nowhere near enough.

The big thing for me is, are ENIC willing to take a loss on selling the mediocre players we have? Because that's what we will get offered from any club willing to take them off us.

If we want to improve the squad now, it means doing the hard thing and selling for a loss. Then investing whatever we get in sales plus injection to get better quality profile players.
 
Apparently this £100m that has been announced is coming from manipulating shares in the club, I don't know if that can be repeated frequently.
It already has been. It's not really manipulation, but just a 'quid pro quo'

If we both own an object, and you don't want to put money into it, I ask for more of a share in return for my investment.

The alternative (and more crooked way) would be the typical PL majority shareholder way of 'loaning' the money to the club, expecting it to be repaid (often at a profit, sometimes not).
Which is 100% of why those "owner investment" charts don't mean the altruism that people have so often wanted to demonstrate in here
 
Imagine if all of the board grouped together does?
My guess is that when the next round of club financials are released highest paid director in PL certainly in comparison to club revenue will be at Brighton, currently on £3.1 million, lot of money for zero trophies.

The Brighton and Hove Albion Football Club Limited
Directors' remuneration
Notes forming part of the financial statementsfor the year ended 30 June 2024
Directors' emoluments
The highest paid director received remuneration of £3,195,000 (2023 - £2,368,000).
This remuneration included base salary and both performance-related and long-term loyalty bonuses.
 
Imagine if all of the board grouped together does?

Which is the Man Utd situation

image-2025-10-23-152517549.png


image-2025-10-23-152833096.png



Basically like a table read for Cocoon 2 and they're paying themselves £8m to run the club into the abyss
 
It already has been. It's not really manipulation, but just a 'quid pro quo'

If we both own an object, and you don't want to put money into it, I ask for more of a share in return for my investment.

The alternative (and more crooked way) would be the typical PL majority shareholder way of 'loaning' the money to the club, expecting it to be repaid (often at a profit, sometimes not).
Which is 100% of why those "owner investment" charts don't mean the altruism that people have so often wanted to demonstrate in here
TBH I don't know how these investments work but it just seems like ENIC have bought shares from minority shareholders, but the minority shareholders haven't been paid for those shares, rather the value of those shares is being put into the football club for transfers, salaries, and whatnot. So the minority shareholders have picked up the tab by losing some of their shares to put extra funds into the club. ENIC are as wealthy as they were before that transaction.

That's what I meant when I used the word 'manipulation' but I'm happy to be corrected if you know better.
 
TBH I don't know how these investments work but it just seems like ENIC have bought shares from minority shareholders, but the minority shareholders haven't been paid for those shares, rather the value of those shares is being put into the football club for transfers, salaries, and whatnot. So the minority shareholders have picked up the tab by losing some of their shares to put extra funds into the club. ENIC are as wealthy as they were before that transaction.

That's what I meant when I used the word 'manipulation' but I'm happy to be corrected if you know better.

No, the minority shareholders have not changed their share value.

Simpler model:
Someone who owned 1% of the club in 2001 had £1m in shares, and let's say today that 1% is now worth £10m. It's a healthy return for doing nothing. Club is now worth £1bn overall.
If there were 100 people with 1%, none of those shareholders would put £100m of their own money and expect nothing back.

Bob owns 1% and decides to put in £100m of his own money. That £100m now increases the company value by £100m, so the club is now worth £1.1bn. Bob now owns 10% of the company (£10m in shares + £100m investment / £1,100m total), and there's £990m of shares still left.
That means the 99% still have £10m each worth of shares.
 
No, the minority shareholders have not changed their share value.

Simpler model:
Someone who owned 1% of the club in 2001 had £1m in shares, and let's say today that 1% is now worth £10m. It's a healthy return for doing nothing. Club is now worth £1bn overall.
If there were 100 people with 1%, none of those shareholders would put £100m of their own money and expect nothing back.

Bob owns 1% and decides to put in £100m of his own money. That £100m now increases the company value by £100m, so the club is now worth £1.1bn. Bob now owns 10% of the company (£10m in shares + £100m investment / £1,100m total), and there's £990m of shares still left.
That means the 99% still have £10m each worth of shares.
I'm saying that ENIC own more of the football club now after the £100m cash injection, hence the minority investors own less. That minority investors reduction has effectively created the £100m. The club's value hasn't increased because the £100m is going to be spent on players and whatnot.

It's written on this website. The section is titled ''Ownership Power Play'',

''While fans focus on transfer potential, the bigger story may be within the club’s ownership structure. ENIC’s injection now means that their stake in the club has risen from 86.91% to 87.62%.''

 
Last edited:

Another appointment. Going to need a bigger boardroom table if we keep this up
I am lucky enough to work for a Global technology company operating in over 200 countries, and am in a position where I present to the board regularly (as an employee / executive subject matter expert in a specific area). A successful board usually has about 10-12 members:
  • Non-Executive Chair (for us it's Peter Charrington)
  • Executive CEO (for us it's Vinai)
  • Executive CFO (for us it's Matthew Collecott performs this role but is a finance director rather than a CFO)
  • 6 - 8 Non Executive Directors (NEDs)
Each NED typically has deep knowledge and experience in an area of expertise that will help review the organisation's progress against strategy, ensure the executives are making the best decisions, and provide assurance to the shareholders. Boards typically meet quarterly, and the meetings last over 2-3 days and review every aspect of the business and strategy. The board is responsible for hiring and firing the CEO, so Vinai will be under the microscope. Also shows how things have changed for the better from when Levy was both the CEO and Chairman (talk about conflict of interest!). This set up is why most informed observers expect a new CFO to be appointed by the end of the company's financial year (which runs to the end of June).

I would expect us to have a collection of NEDs who have specialist knowledge and experience in one of the following types of areas:
  • Football administration and regulation
  • Football scouting and transfers
  • Medical (sport specific)
  • Commercial revenue
  • Marketing
  • Communications
  • Sponsorship deals
  • Property management
  • Football finance
Daniel Levy would actually make an amazing NED for a football club. If I was a big European club I would be knocking Levy's door down to appoint him as a subject matter expert NED on Football administration and regulation, to guide the board and owners on their strategy to navigate the complex regulations now in place. Obviously wouldn't listen to a word he says on transfers ... ;)
 
Back
Top