Newcastle owners selling off 25%. Wonder if levy might want to get his money out and have a dabble up there?![]()
He's coming for you. He's coming for you, oo ooo
Daniel levy....He's coming for you
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Newcastle owners selling off 25%. Wonder if levy might want to get his money out and have a dabble up there?![]()
All about cutting corners and costs.Yep, ridiculous to mention the word "smart" on anything they've done. Spent hundreds of millions to find the next Eriksen, when we could go out and buy a ready made Eriksen replacement, and potentially get relegated in the process.
You buy the young punts when you have a first team that is settled and bed them in. We don't do that. Those two should be tried at the Hague.
What about how this club has operated since Levy was sacked makes you think he was forced out because we didn't pay high enough salaries to players?The figures show how poorly the club has been managed, we've spend a huge amount on good but nothing exceptional players, the club can claim it's spent big on transfers fees over a period of time, but, they haven't been paying the sort of salaries that top players can get elsewhere, it's pretty much what the protests were about, and I guess it's a reason why Levy has been booted out.
Still that figure €763m on transfers since 2020 is about two seasons revenue at most, apparently the present revenue is €672.62. of course there's salaries to be taken into account but the club has surely had a couple of billion in revenue since 2020.
There's also transfers out to be taken into account. So where is most of the revenue going if not on transfers in?
Daniel Levy buys a minority share in Newcastle.Daniel Levy......He's coming for you
He's coming for you. He's coming for you, oo ooo
Daniel levy....He's coming for you
![]()
![]()
Ha ha.Daniel Levy buys a minority share in Newcastle.
The Saudi PIF tells Levy to spend whatever he wants, something Lewis would never do.
Levy, Poch and Newcastle win the league.
Spursy.
Be funny to see Airfixx posting on NUFC forum with Geordie dialectDaniel Levy......He's coming for you
He's coming for you. He's coming for you, oo ooo
Daniel levy....He's coming for you
![]()
![]()
All of that assumes Levy was the one setting the guiding principles of the club. There's nothing about operations post-Levy that indicates that is the case.Ha ha.
If a club is about to embark on an ambitious spending spree, I don't think Daniel Levy is top of the wanted list
However, if a prolonged period of austerity, minimal squad investment and a focus on non footballing expenditure is on the cards, he's the first man they're calling.
Lewis and Levy were on the same page. In the same bed.All of that assumes Levy was the one setting the guiding principles of the club. There's nothing about operations post-Levy that indicates that is the case.
We'll see, but I fear too many people give him too much of the blame compared to the Lewises.
Not necessarily arguing the point.Lewis and Levy were on the same page. In the same bed.
They purchased the club together and Daniel Levy openly stated there objectives at the time.
If Joe was the vehicle, Daniel was the willing driver.
Not necessarily arguing the point.
But what would have done differently in his shoes?
You get hooked up with a wealthy (but not massively wealthy) investor who asks you to run their football club sustainably in return for a quarter share?
Sure, you could throw a strop. But then you end up sacked and what have you accomplished?
Just think there was a little too much jubilation when Levy left, as if things would change. It was never Levy setting the financial policy, it was always Lewis. Whether Levy was happy or not is really beside the point.
Not paying wages in line with a club of our size has led to us recruiting lots of subpar players and opportunistic punts, which in-turn, directly contributed to years of decline in sporting performance, which is what he was sacked for.What about how this club has operated since Levy was sacked makes you think he was forced out because we didn't pay high enough salaries to players?
Nothing about how this club is run is going to change. Levy was pushed out because he was Joe Lewis' man and Vivienne Lewis was underlining her authority over the club. She hired the gooner Vinai and held Levy over long enough to bed him in.
Levy said he wouldn't be appreciated until he was gone. I believe that indicates he doesn't expect the orders from the top will change at all under the new boss, and that he was able to do more with less over the past 25 years than Vinai or any otger replacement will.
Whether that's true or not, we'll see. I definitely think Vinai is shit, worse than Levy, and will eventually be sacked.
Very good point well made . It's a crying shame that the academy are not trained to play with the same philosophy as the first team . Wayne Burnette should be coaching them so their path to the first team can become almost seamless , The players will already be playing the football the first team are playing as second nature .Seems like we were linked to Wharton, Scott, Olise etc all when they were Champo players, but the managers didn't want them
people always say we should "back the manager" and not "sign kids", but managers don't expect to be here to benefit from signing them and have no patience with it. Redknapp said similar recently - they don't give a fuck.
So really, we need to be moving towards a point where we have a Sherwood style person in on the academy side who brings in young products and pushes for a path into the first team.
That would mean we could spread the budget around less and focus on 1 or 2 players in our £150m budget, instead of 6 shit ones
No. Levy was 100% sacked because Vivienne didn't want her dad's long term partner still running things. Standard business takeover policy.Not paying wages in line with a club of our size has led to us recruiting lots of subpar players and opportunistic punts, which in-turn, directly contributed to years of decline in sporting performance, which is what he was sacked for.
Or replace Poch with Ange. Brennan playing right wing and scoring 20 goals.
So many clubs do it better - we wouldn't have harry kane in the team without a Sherwood pushing for them and I feel like when McDermott went it really went downhill.Very good point well made . It's a crying shame that the academy are not trained to play with the same philosophy as the first team . Wayne Burnette should be coaching them so their path to the first team can become almost seamless , The players will already be playing the football the first team are playing as second nature .
So the internal review was all just a load of made up nonsense? Business takeover strategy? It's the same company, whatever way you want to swing it.No. Levy was 100% sacked because Vivienne didn't want her dad's long term partner still running things. Standard business takeover policy.
Thinking anything else is speculative, and misplaced IMO, optimism. The MO of the club isn't changing as long as ENIC own it.
I was to keep it believable!Or replace Poch with Ange. Brennan playing right wing and scoring 20 goals.
Spursy to the power Spursy.

So the internal review was all just a load of made up nonsense? Business takeover strategy? It's the same company, whatever way you want to swing it.
![]()
Tottenham remove Daniel Levy as chairman after ownership-instigated review
Levy was told on Thursday he would be leaving his position, with Peter Charrington stepping into the new role of non-executive chairman.www.nytimes.com
ShadyBe funny to see Airfixx posting on NUFC forum with Geordie dialect
When I suggested that Tim Sherwood should be running the academy's prodigies I got shot down in flames by some idiot , the prick moaned that Sherwood was a self serving parasite and had no place in our club . I think Sherwood would do a great job of mentoring the youngsters that are showing the right attitude and promise . There are so many that don't make it , and most can't make the giant leap from academy to first team level , but for the special talents that are coming through - we need an ambassador like Sherwood at their side telling them if they keep their nose clean and concentrate on their football - that there's a path to first team football . There are some good young kids coming through ATM - Williams Barnett is a great young player who's destined for a tremendous career in football .So many clubs do it better - we wouldn't have harry kane in the team without a Sherwood pushing for them and I feel like when McDermott went it really went downhill.
I've said it before, but clubs like Chelsea, City, Liverpool - they farm their academy and subsidise their budget with the ones that aren't good enough (although they do let some that are slip through).
Felt like we were better at it when it was just manager+levy, and have been fucking awful at selling ever since we got a Hitchen/Partici/Lange type in doing it