Well this is quite possibly the worst article I've read on here.
Thank you for your feedback. A couple of points on your remarks.
1. The only way spurs are able to sign players of lloris and Vertonghen class without regular CL money is via TV money. We don't generate enough money to compete with certain teams. No Bale, no attraction, less global appeal, less of a bargaining chip, less TV money. BT and SKY reducing the money they invest will only hurt us.
2. Its the idea that Bale gives us a player we can be proud of and people around the globe aspire to be. How many times as a kid did you pretend to be Doherty, Sherwood, or Jason Cundy in your back garden? Football is a sport that has always inspired people from different countries, in Bale Tottenham have someone that does this.
So you don't care that a kid somewhere is pretending to be spurs player? Would you prefer him to be Walcott? You don't feel any sort of pride about your club inspiring young people? You would prefer us to be unknown?
3.Bale is one of very few truly class acts left in the PL. I don't want to spend my money going to watch Adam Johnson/Charlie Adam/Lee Cattermole lumbering around a pitch for 50 quid. I like to be able to watch class players at the top of their game, regardless of who they play for. If Bale isn't the standard bearer for English football who is? The national team? The Under 21's? John Terry?
4. The reasons attendances are falling are ticket prices soaring. Clubs trying to make as much money as possible in order to stay competitive. Wages have stayed the same but living costs have risen, people cant afford to spend the little money they have left at the end of the month on watching live football.
You know for a fact that BT will contribute to lower attendances? Please look into your crystal ball and tell me the euro millions numbers for tonight. Then perhaps i can buy a player for spurs and we can exist without TV money.