• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Ex-Spurs Player Harry Kane

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

But he is right Kane doesn't eat to be at spurs he made it obvious his ambition levels can't be reached at our club.
What ambition is that? Getting to finals and having games that need to be won to win you league titles?

It's bo!!ocks mate.

He may want to move on but nobody should ever say he didn't have the chances for silverware at club and country whilst he was with us. Complete misrepresentation of the facts.
 
What ambition is that? Getting to finals and having games that need to be won to win you league titles?

It's bo!!ocks mate.

He may want to move on but nobody should ever say he didn't have the chances for silverware at club and country whilst he was with us. Complete misrepresentation of the facts.
If he had gone or does go to city would he win the league or CL the chances are much greater.
But if he stays at Tottenham another 3/4 years would he win those or anything I would say no.
Maybe he just wants a pay rise who knows but it's clear he doesn't want to play for us.
 
Hmmm…really easy to say now,
...implication being that I'm JCL to this "sell Harry" lark...
but if he was banging in a hat trick each week
And this is where the convo usually goes off the rails. So I ask, let me make this statement and we just leave it at that: I don't rate a striker on the number of goals he scores so this conditional statement you make matters not in my eyes.

In my defense I am having another debate with someone in this thread about our strikers lack of athleticism and HUP...tapping in a hat trick means nothing to me insofar as rating a player. Goals are not an intrinsic quality of a player they are the result of team play more often than not. If they weren't then why doesn't Harry just decide to score?
you wouldn’t be saying that.
I would be, have been, and will continue to say we should have sold him.
Not many expected Harry’s apparent disinterest so not sure you can include that.
What others do is no concern of mine. So I need not be constrained by their lack of recognition. And there were many saying we shouldn't keep a player that wants to leave. Many suggested we'd be looking at another Eriksen-type situation. I was in both camps so I will include it.
However, definitely more are coming around to a need to maybe sell if it doesn’t pick up.
The thing is tht it doesn't matter how he plays for us. The right decision was there to be made and it wasn't. Decisions are made with the information and insight available at the time.
OTOH, I can always see what Levy has done for the club, as Harry has, as Redknapp did, even Sherwood and Adebayor, Sugar et al. Just because someone has made some mistakes, I like to see the positives. Different perspectives, I guess.
...implication being those that criticize cannot see these positive things and are blinded by their negativity then? Unfair...and nonsense! And liking seeing the positives shouldn't stop one from realistically acknowledging the negatives. My belief is that the happy clappers think they are superior fans in some jaded way. Everyone wants positivity around their club but that doesn't mean you have to walk around in some Panglossian, happy clapping, mindless stupor. It's cult-like. (and of course I have to add the disclaimer "not saying that you are any of these things etc etc blah blah blah")

And with Levy it often isn't about 'some mistakes' it's more about making the same mistakes...in fact, certain things have happened so frequently and predictably it not looking like mistakes but intent.
 
I don’t think anyone is a 150 million type of player. Take that fee any time it’s offered for literally anyone.
Such a fucking great point. So good in fact I've made it multiple times myself. Folks don't like to hear it. There was only 1 player ever worth this type of crazy money.

Igula Igula
 
Last edited:
If he had gone or does go to city would he win the league or CL the chances are much greater.
But if he stays at Tottenham another 3/4 years would he win those or anything I would say no.
Maybe he just wants a pay rise who knows but it's clear he doesn't want to play for us.

Which is a fair assessment but he has had more chances than Shearer ever had with Newcastle.

The bloke needs to ask himself one day what difference he made when it really mattered for us.

Him winning something if and when he goes to City means Jack sh!t to me.
 
What ambition is that? Getting to finals and having games that need to be won to win you league titles?

It's bo!!ocks mate.

He may want to move on but nobody should ever say he didn't have the chances for silverware at club and country whilst he was with us. Complete misrepresentation of the facts.
You’re right. Harry will win a few trophies with us by the time he hangs up his boots and then he’ll wonder why he ever flirted with Man City.

No player goes to Chelski or City for anything other than money, at least Kane loves this club, the fans and the new stadium.
 
Which is a fair assessment but he has had more chances than Shearer ever had with Newcastle.

The bloke needs to ask himself one day what difference he made when it really mattered for us.

Him winning something if and when he goes to City means Jack sh!t to me.
Look I don't want him to win stuff at city but the reality side of me knows that it would happen.
On the flip side of that I would prefer it if we were winning stuff like city but that won't happen either.
 
You’re right. Harry will win a few trophies with us by the time he hangs up his boots and then he’ll wonder why he ever flirted with Man City.

No player goes to Chelski or City for anything other than money, at least Kane loves this club, the fans and the new stadium.
Do you honestly see us winning something anytime soon?

I really do not. Let’s hope you’re right and I’m wrong
 
Messi, Ronaldo and Neymar for a while were worth double that.
Only Messi...for me. For that type of money you want a player that cannot be defended, that not only creates their own goals but creates for others. A players that can handle pressure with the ball and transition on the dribble or with the pass...no matter how you defend him. Too many arrows in his quiver to be contained.

Ronaldo scores but is a dependent player i.e. he brings nothing else and relies on service. Neymar can create but lacks in other areas. They are not in the same footballing universe as the little guy...for me.
 
Only Messi...for me. For that type of money you want a player that cannot be defended, that not only creates their own goals but creates for others. A players that can handle pressure with the ball and transition on the dribble or with the pass...no matter how you defend him. Too many arrows in his quiver to be contained.

Ronaldo scores but is a dependent player i.e. he brings nothing else and relies on service. Neymar can create but lacks in other areas. They are not in the same footballing universe as the little guy...for me.

Ronaldo absolutely compares to Messi mate. Possibly more so.

Take any sense of bias out of the equation if it's there.

Both players have been off the scale good and for years. Absolute respect to both men.

Set standards like very few if any that have gone before them.
 
Last edited:
Ronaldo absolutely compares to Messi mate. Possibly more so.
Not really statement of any meaning though, is it? I compare to Messi. Everyone on this board compares to Messi. Just how well we show up in comparision is the problem. In Ronaldo - the goal scorer's case he compares unfavorably to Messi - the complete player. But yes, he does compare to him.

Take any sense of bias out of the equation if it's there.
surely you have to have something to support alleging any potential bias. I just stated all the things Messi was and Ronaldo is so few of those. Hell of a knack for getting a goal though.

Both players have been off the scale good and got years.
One has scored goals and the other has done things that few could even conceive. And yes they have done it for years.

Set standards like very few if any that have gone before them.
Like you said, respect to them both. But the standard Ronaldo set as a goalscorer does not put him in the same convo with Messi. I wish I had the van Basten quote about this. but let's jsut say his view on the linking of these two players as if they are equals was not a good one for CRonaldo fans.

For me I've always used it as a little test of a person's footballing savvy. It's kinda like the Dele test I use for Spurs supporters.
 
Back
Top