Thick and thin. Kane is under contract and Levy must insist he stays.
To let him go offer us a world record fee. Why should we bolster the teams of anyone, most of all in this country?
Posters/fans need to remind themselves it's not KFC but THFC or maybe they aren't the fans they think they are.
Not everything is so black and white.
There is an element of gentleman's mutual trust between club rep and the player. Both compromise for mutual benefit. If the benefit is no longer good for one side to stay in agreement, it's understandable for club to allow the player to leave. And the player is responsible to work with the club to leave on club term.
So if the fee is fair, and the club has no issue of the player destination then all is good. The club can force a player to stay, but there is no guarantee on player commitment to perform. The player performance level drop is both loss on and off the pitch, his contribution to team result, and his own value, even if we don't decide to sell. Best players should be among top earner at the clubs. A high earner that not justifying his wage, then you have to raise the wage for the performing players. Leave it long enough, and it creates different issue,
Kane has always stayed professional, and has tried everything himself. For Levy, he has made some serious mistake that leads us into this situation. If there is a side to pick, for me it's not Levy's. If Kane decides to stay, he's very welcomed, but if he wants to leave on good term, then for me at this stage of his career, it's understandable