Dear me it becomes pointless.
Okay lets see who we pretend to bid for by January 31st.
People have got to get past this Kane obsession. Until we get a proper 2nd striker we ain't winning sh!t. Remember whilst many of you clamber for a central defender we had Dembele and Wanyama at their best for a while. We won what?
Sissoko been our best player this season. We have lost 6 games out of 22. The most in the top 6 despite being 3rd.
We need to not quake in our boots if Kane gets injured. We need another STRIKER who can step in. Who might already be playing and leave Son where he plays best, when available of course.
If we want to be the best we equip ourselves.
Pochettino need look at nearly every single successful side to see you must have more than one out and out striker on your books.
It beggars belief that so many can neither see it or accept it.
Answer two simple questions -
1) Could we buy a better striker than Harry Kane?
2) Who has bigger impact on the games - someone who starts all the important games or someone who sits on the bench most of the time?
Talking about open quesitons - you quote number of games we lost... yea, but how did you prove that it was down to the lack of strikers? You just state a fact and do not explain how it is relevant to this issue.
Kane in fact put us into the lead in 2 of those 6. In both cases we failed to keep onto this lead (if we would we'd be just 3 points off top now).
Or can you explain, how have we failed to win titles BECAUSE of the lack of 2nd "out-and-out-striker"? How exactly has this influenced?