-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers January 2020 transfer thread
- Thread starter Achilles
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
- Status
Report: Spurs 'primed and ready' to launch bid for La Liga winger
Tottenham Hotspur are considering making an offer for Atletico Madrid’s Thomas Lemar. The Sun claim that Spurs along with London rivals Chelsea and Woolwich are...
EH?
Swap Lamela for Piatek, bring in Lemar?
Yet we're still signing the exactly same type of players
We should totally get this moving.
Persuade Chelski to sell him to us.
Put him up at Spurs lodge.
Give him a medical on Friday.
Put a contract in front of him at 10.55 PM Friday night.
Then Daniel Levy comes into the room and rips it up in front of Giroud's tear-streaked face.
The very least there shouldn’t be many excuses if we are active this summer.
Last edited:
Went on a free so I assume his wages are massive. Probably the issue.
10 is even worse for your argument, but here you go
Add the £400m or so we've parted with for the stadium and training ground way before we moved in and we are spending along the same kind of lines as Chelsea & Juventus and substantially more than the likes of Bayern Munich. That seems OK to me.
That's different kind of expenditure as it concerns loans against (appreciating) assets..
How is that worse? do you have a brain at all?
I said the last three years show a completely different strategy than the previous ten, you said same old same old ... now you are just proving my point, so thank you.
We have spent by your own figures 110m net in the last three years compared to just 10m net in the previous ten ... exactly the point I was trying to get into your thick skull, it's a whole new ball game ... so thanks for backing me up.
The loans we have aren't the same. Before the stadium had been built we invested something like £300m-£400m of our own money into the build, materials, land etc. I'll dig it out for you hold up a sec..
You said this which is what is completely untrue
FYI - last ten years annual net spend top six ...
Man City 107m (madness)
Man Utd 83m
Chelsea 42m
Woolwich 41m
Liverpool 29m
Spurs 7m
You do realize his 107 million figure stated "the average net spend per year" right?10 is even worse for your argument, but here you go
So your picture suggests that number for city would be 1.18 billion over 10 years or 118 million net spend per year on average, opposed to his 107 million.
I can understand if you guys don't like each other but I think you're not really arguing about the same thing by accident.
We actually need a DM more now.
We can play....
............................Son
Bergwijn.......Alli...........Moura
We can play....
............................Son
Bergwijn.......Alli...........Moura
No it doesn't, again you're just making stuff up, the bonds only apply after the stadium was finished. We used over 300m of our own money towards the stadium all paid in cash ... how do you think we managed a 900m stadium with only 600m of bonds .... doh
Ha - his post implied total net spend over 10 years. I stand corrected then
More lies - do you have any proof to back that up?
- Status