• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers January Transfer Thread 2024

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

The crazy thing is we are in the hunt to actually win the league this year whether people think that’s a dream or not. That’s why it’s even more important to get player or players in for Utd. We likely won’t win the league but we are in there with a fighting chance once we get our injured players back and a couple of new signings.
ENIC don't see it that way, they have no urgency at all.
 
If it was about Burnley and UTD in isolation (I don't see why anyone can feel safe in their assumption we will have a 3rd CB in time to play UTD) then absolutely you are right. UTD probably more worth the 2m due to the financial windfall from the CL.

But it's not just about those 2 games, it's about the whole season and that we needed a 3rd CB in the summer, badly. It has already cost us points that could cost us points and any team serious about winning the premier league would never have risked those points.
Aha, and that second part is a completely different point that I agree with. We mustn't artifically conflate the two things though - msot would agree that we should have got another CB last summer, and hopefully most would agree we've been punished for that to the fullest degree with bad luck on CB injuries - but that's all happened now. My issue here is with people insisting that we should 'pay the fucking money' to get Dragusin here this week rather than next week or the following week (which I appreciate are both different, due to the United game).

If we weren't in the transfer window now, and someone asked me if I wanted us to loan Dragusin in for just the United game for £2m, I'd say no, that's poor value for one or even two games. I know it could help us to win the match, but as someone who works with risk & reward, I'd say the cost is too high for the incremental increase in our chances of getting the ultimate reward, a CL place. It would help us obviously, but £2m would be too steep for me. And that is what is being debated here - not whether or not to sign him at all, but whether to pay extra to get him in sooner.
 
The crazy thing is we are in the hunt to actually win the league this year whether people think that’s a dream or not. That’s why it’s even more important to get player or players in for Utd. We likely won’t win the league but we are in there with a fighting chance once we get our injured players back and a couple of new signings.

For me that's why it's not unreasonable for fans to be frustrated that it wasn't sorted by the end of the first week in January.

By rights, the gamble probably should have cost us any chance at a title run but thanks to the coaching staff and players stepping up, it miraculously hasn't. You'd think that would be enough encouragement for the club to also step up its game.
 
Well it would have been a week wasted, when Ange said he wanted players in early. Then we have to go to the next person on the list doing the same kind of negotiations running down the clock.
All managers want new signings in early - they are not responsible for the financial side.

I'm not advocating going to the next person on the list - if we really want Dragusin and don't get him then I'll be pissed off too, but that seems unlikely to me - I guess only time will tell...
 
But you can say that about anyone.

The thing is, I trust in Ange and if Ange has given the nod, then paying and extra 2-5 milion just to get him here asap to fill a massive hole in the depth of the squad is worth it.

The guy looks great and exactly the sort of play Ange likes.

It's a no brainer for me, just pay up, we can afford it and we will more than likely make a lot more from it in the future.
The context was saying we should spend X amount more to secure a player for a specific game. And in that context, yes you’re right - we can say that about anyone. That’s the point.
 
Aha, and that second part is a completely different point that I agree with. We mustn't artifically conflate the two things though - msot would agree that we should have got another CB last summer, and hopefully most would agree we've been punished for that to the fullest degree with bad luck on CB injuries - but that's all happened now. My issue here is with people insisting that we should 'pay the fucking money' to get Dragusin here this week rather than next week or the following week (which I appreciate are both different, due to the United game).

If we weren't in the transfer window now, and someone asked me if I wanted us to loan Dragusin in for just the United game for £2m, I'd say no, that's poor value for one or even two games. I know it could help us to win the match, but as someone who works with risk & reward, I'd say the cost is too high for the incremental increase in our chances of getting the ultimate reward, a CL place. It would help us obviously, but £2m would be too steep for me. And that is what is being debated here - not whether or not to sign him at all, but whether to pay extra to get him in sooner.
And why the fuck would we be asking for a loan?

It needs to be a permantent transfer, becasue we want Europe and to challenge on all fronts next season.

Only a clueless bald c**t like levy would ask for a loan in a position we are desperate to cover permanently.
 
Aha, and that second part is a completely different point that I agree with. We mustn't artifically conflate the two things though - msot would agree that we should have got another CB last summer, and hopefully most would agree we've been punished for that to the fullest degree with bad luck on CB injuries - but that's all happened now. My issue here is with people insisting that we should 'pay the fucking money' to get Dragusin here this week rather than next week or the following week (which I appreciate are both different, due to the United game).

If we weren't in the transfer window now, and someone asked me if I wanted us to loan Dragusin in for just the United game for £2m, I'd say no, that's poor value for one or even two games. I know it could help us to win the match, but as someone who works with risk & reward, I'd say the cost is too high for the incremental increase in our chances of getting the ultimate reward, a CL place. It would help us obviously, but £2m would be too steep for me. And that is what is being debated here - not whether or not to sign him at all, but whether to pay extra to get him in sooner.

OK.

it looks like we are close to a middle ground. Could start a whole new conversation about that second paragraph but instead let's leave it here:


The 3rd CB should have been done in the summer and not gambled on to cost us points. And to follow that it should be done before it adds risk to any more points and the FA Cup. We have already missed the FA Cup so we can ascertain that competition isn't as high priority for the club, now they need to make sure on UTD away.
 
All managers want new signings in early - they are not responsible for the financial side.

I'm not advocating going to the next person on the list - if we really want Dragusin and don't get him then I'll be pissed off too, but that seems unlikely to me - I guess only time will tell...
I'm talking about Ange,not other managers he was very clear about what he wants.
Why don't you advocate going to the next person on the list if you don't want us to pay the extra millions?
To get Dragusin at the end of the window, would be unacceptable.
 
There is a fucking massive difference between over paying 20, 30, 40 million for a player Chelsea style.

And over paying paying 1,2, 4,5 million for a hot prospect that could before double in the years to come. And probably make that small over pay back in next to no time. In a postion that we desperately need back up for.

And you never make this distinction.

And of course, no one has ever said that we need him to beat Burnely, but having someone who is good in that position can make that job a lot easier and of course have that extra time to fit in, train, and play with the guys before the next PL game is a benefit too.

Here's the thing though, you or I don't know what 'overpaying' is, you're just guessing because you see Tottenham holding firm in a negotiation and stand on our value and you perceive that as us haggling, but it's already been explained that had we 'overpaid' it's likely we'd probably still end up in this position and Genoa would be asking for more.

It's just classic negotiation tactics, every club does it:

Have a look at the protracted saga's of Mudryk and Caicedo for Woolwich, Lavia for Liverpool, same patterns, same stances albeit for higher fees, none of those transfer got resolved by the way, or at the same time you can look at the Antony saga for Man Utd, Ajax valued him at £25m, Utd ended up paying £90m because they panicked

It's not exclusive to us, maybe because you're a Spurs fan and you live and breathe Spurs and most probably don't take into account other club's business but I can tell you we aren't the only ones doing this.
 
Why wait until Jan 1st then?

The idea that negotiations need to start when the window opens is as mythical as Santa coming down the chimney.

Teams negotiation via intermediaries and verbal offers all the time during the season.
What makes you so sure we did wait until Jan 1st? That's just an arbitrary date I used in my imaginary scenario.

What incentive would Genoa have to agree a deal in advance of that? They could agree to sell him to us in November for a fee, what his form sky rocket and then be left kicking themselves for unnecessarily agreeing to a deal in advance.

Even now with the window open, given that he's on of their main assets, they would be better off delaying on the deal a) so that they can use him and b) because other suitors might come out of the woodwork.

As far as I'm aware, they're not desperate to sell, so worst case for them we look elsewhere, no other buyers turn up, and they keep a player they don't want to sell anyway.
 
And why the fuck would we be asking for a loan?

It needs to be a permantent transfer, becasue we want Europe and to challenge on all fronts next season.

Only a clueless bald c**t like levy would ask for a loan in a position we are desperate for.
Oh dear, that seems to have gone right over your head...

I was providing an imaginary scenario outside of a transfer window open period in order to exmaine the 'value' of having a player for 1 or 2 games and paying £2m for that privilege. I believe the poster it was aimed at will have understood perfectly well.
 
Back
Top