• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management Johan Lange - Technical Director

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Paratici was "consulting" during that period, so probably still him.

Just so I can align to which way is up, is it on Levy because they haven't been a success?



Asking because people also go apeshit when there's a hint he "blocked" or "refused" a transfer. What would be the right solution
F knows

Only buying from one agency is on him and restricted a DOF.

Who knows if him, Donna and Collecot had the final say,or too much say or too little. Was a clusterfuck
 
Last edited:
Kind of weird reaction for a guy who believes stuff no one is corroborating and pretending to be some kind of "itk"
I’m not pretending to be an ITK. I have no idea on which players we are interested in, one thing Levy did pretty well was close those leaks down. There is also plenty of indirect feedback on managers not having the final say and I know for a fact that wasn’t the case for a while, and it was a broad transfer committee that had a final say, but I suspect that evolved - and in certain scenarios the mgr did pull rank and fe his player but clearly didn’t happen regularly.

I do know people that have contacts in the non football side of the club, and do believe that investigation is in progress by the Lewis’. It’s pretty obvious what Levy’s motives and failing were, so also believe there’s no smoke without fire and they were absolutely right to sack him. Majority of fans hated him and fo good reason

I’m not sure what your point is tbh. Do you not believe there’s an investigation? Do you not believe they will find anything and that Levy was doing a good job?
 
I’m not pretending to be an ITK.


Yes mate, sure... You don't pretend to have inside information at all...

I have an update on the investigation into the alleged failings and potential wrongdoings of the megalomaniac, little tyrant.

Clearly a way to go but no smoke without fire and they must have some evidence. Will post a few specifics this morning but let’s hope he gets what coming. As most thought, appears he was operating for his own self interest, rather than the clubs.

Some contrary, deluded posters have a formal apology to make. He was toxic. A cancerous plague, so why did you argue black was white? Hopefully three outcomes; loses all his shares and stock, and the other two are TBC
 
As I said, no ITK on football matters / new transfers. That other info is fairly common knowledge. I think the athletic reported similar a while ago albeit at a high level

Why are you acting like such a cunt?

If it wasn't pretending to be "itk", you wouldn't have said "I have an update", "Will post a few specifics", "Some contrary, deluded posters have a formal apology to make.".

You actually post in every thread as very aggressive and self-righteous, but don't appear to know anything other than what you're reading on the internet. If you don't like people pointing it out, don't do it.

You've even been tagging me in provocative comments in other threads. It's christmas ffs, stop calling people abusive things and log off for a bit.
 
No, the Villa Reddit board seems to think he did an okay job. Good at selling players too although wasn’t great with the Grealish money. His results were positive — or, at least the club’s result were positive during his tenure (of course no one outside the organization knows exactly who did what).

I’m sure there’s a Villa Massive fan who thinks that because they were the first club to win 7 FA Cups, he should have been able to sign Vinicius and Haaland but every fanbase has a few Cupid Stunts.

On our one it’s the most stupid cunts ever though so got to assume Villa’s is the same. Anything they say on there the opposite is probably correct. Even worse place for opinions than SC.
 
The manager always has the final say. Been confirmed by several people but doesn't seem to stop people blaming anyone but the manager.
Agree, but the final say seems to be, for example, do you want Tel or no one, do you want Solanke or no one ? Etc

It does not seem to be a manager getting their picks, just a choice of others picks
 
Agree, but the final say seems to be, for example, do you want Tel or no one, do you want Solanke or no one ? Etc

It does not seem to be a manager getting their picks, just a choice of others picks
Oh wait, I found this paragraph from an interview article some weeks ago, I can't make any sense out of it TBH. It's on the official club website;

Will you hope to have the final say, if it’s a player potentially in January or the summer?

Thomas: “I always have a final say, you know that, of course, in the end. It's team work. I'm pretty sure if one of the, I would say three of us, because Vinai is the same, not technically, technical or whatever you call it. Of course, he will have an opinion, but the three of us need to agree and if one, let's take an example, it doesn't matter if it's me, Fabio, and it's very, very, very strong, they should not be the player, then that's probably not that right. So, I'm pretty sure that we will find a good way to do it.”

And oddly no mention of Lange.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top