The key to this is to be honest about what we don’t know.
It’s clearly a system with many different people involved and we don’t have lot of insight. There’s no way to see behind the curtain.
I think the biggest mistake was hiring Frank. He was the wrong choice. Managerial appointments are difficult.
Money spent this season
Woolwich - €295m (4 signings above 50m)
Chelsea - €339 (3)
Liverpool - €482m (3)
Man City - €305m (2)
Man Utd - €337m (3)
Tottenham - €265 (2)
So the other big 6 clubs spent anywhere between 11% and 82% more than us. And this repeats year after year.
Do you think that is Lange’s fault? Do you think hes given more money to spend and chooses not to spend it?
Now when we look at wages the closest club is Chelsea who spend 25% more than us. Everyone else spends more than that.
So these are the facts and my INFERENCE is that Lange is not responsible for the difference in spending on transfer fees and wages and so the pool of players is limited.
How do you make lemonade from lemons? Well I think his strategy of trying to sign the best young players he can is smart given the constraints he is dealing with . Nearly every signing is 18-24. Many have a lot of experience given their age and have high upside.
But there is no way to compete with clubs in the short term when other clubs will spend more on transfer fees and wages year after year (without a lot of luck).
The idea that other clubs spending more is kinda weak...Plenty of teams with less money build more coherent squads...this is my issue, it's not about what we spend it's always been how we spend it - has Lange improved on that since he's been around? You'd have to say so far, no. Villa and Newcastle have both recruited better than us yet pay less wages so that's not an excuse.
What is Lange's job?, is it just to recruit players or is it also his job to build an adequate squad and seek out the right profiles we need to improve us because from where I am he hasn't done any of these. This is my biggest issue with Lange we have had a load of holes in our squad that needs plugging yet there's 0 evidence of any joined up thinking in terms of recruitment, for example things like not recruiting another LCB to cover or push VDV, not recruiting a LB for 3 years, the failure in profiling a passing mid, the failure in not recruiting a LW, the over reliance of ball carrying midfielders etc...This is why by the way I fully believe that he turned to Gallagher when he couldn't get Jones out of Liverpool because it aligns with our transfer strategy of not really having any consistency.
I don't like the fact that he has seemingly ignored our injury crisis which has been happening over the past few years, you can't stop injuries happening but you can do your best to manage the situation and I don't believe the club or he has done that very well.
For a club to put out there and send the message stating we want to 'compete on all fronts' how can you look at this squad and think that's any way true - this is what I judge him off by the way, the state of the squad doesn't even allow us to compete in 2 competitions let alone 4 - This is why I question the decision to buy kids, if your sole focus is buying 18-24 year olds it's contradictory to the statement of competing.