The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Like I said...no I meant which decisions is that table taking into account and are they factoring in how the new VAR decisions would have affected the game...Well no, because that isn't how VAR works
But that is still utter bollocks and doesn't take into account that VAR is still subjective. I write this because I am assuming that the person that has put this together thinks that we shouldn't have been awarded the penalty against Liverpool (van Dicks kick on Lamela). If that was the result of the extra 2 points awarded to Liverpool, does anyone agree with that decision on here?
Brighton the most hard done by! Would have finished 6 places higher while Leicester & Bournemouth -5 & -4 places resp. Oh, and Huddersfield would have been relagated at the expense of Stoke.
Assumes anyone bar victim scousers gives a shitAssumes penalties will be scored?
Is this based on offside and missed pens or something? I mean this is all well and good, but every decision and non-decision changes the flow and outcome of the game, so this is pretty useless.
Brighton the most hard done by! Would have finished 6 places higher while Leicester & Bournemouth -5 & -4 places resp. Oh, and Huddersfield would have been relagated at the expense of Stoke.
Lock thread - delete OPDelete this scouse nonsense.
I hope this poster get reinstated soon.Glad VAR is coming in next season - only way to eradicate blatant shockers, imv. There will always be detractors but I believe it does more good than harm