Stability is a feature definitely. And teams with volatility have fared a lot worse than teams with stability. Think about Manchester United since they want from stable to volatile. Or Everton (who were a similar size club to us when ENIC took over (I know that’s before your time).It's entirely rational when you realise football is a sport and not war, or accounting, or something else that is very serious. These topics deserve an entirely rational approach, football doesn't. Sport is meant to be about highs and lows and emotion, it's designed to be romantic.
Your arguments might be more convincing (and we wouldn't have an 85% majority on this forum convinced by ENIC out) if we weren't talking about sport. In that context it isn t rational to act like stability is the Holy Grail, in fact in sporting terms stability is often more frustrating than being rubbish.
People don't pay the highest ticket prices in the world & travel all over the place for another 20 years of stability, and that's all we'll get as we're no closer to winning a trophy than we have been at any point in a decade. ENIC in posters = treading water, happy to accept abject mediocrity. ENIC Out = daring to dream, risk takers who understand that football is the beautiful motherfucking game and not bloody accounting. You lot stick to missionary in bed, admit it...*
*This characterisation is very tongue in cheek, but since you're deigning to portray the ENIC in posters as some paragon of rational, deep thought, I reckoned I'd do something similar in reverse.
ENIC have overseen sustained, long-term progress. That’s the key to this.
Creating volatility gives you space to dream but it doesn’t lead to long term success. The only teams who have combined volatility with long term success are those who have been rich enough to soak up their expensive failures. That’s not us.