• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management Levy / ENIC

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Levy In or Levy Out


  • Total voters
    343
Levy is a loser, he is ok with and often rewards failure. I can tell you know, getting to the Europa final and losing will be seen as a decent result that he'll probably put in a match programme as a measure of some success, that's brighton level stuff.
A real winner would make it clear that not winning a trophy or being involved in a title race is a huge failure. This would be knowm and their would be pressure on the coach , the staff and the players to win

There's only one PL team in a title race this season, so that's a fairly narrow definition of not being a 'huge failure'.
 
There's only one PL team in a title race this season, so that's a fairly narrow definition of not being a 'huge failure'.

i didnt say it's only title race dependent though did i. If the chelsea manager doesnt win something this season do you not think he's job has a question mark over it even if he finishes top 5, same goes for Amorim. Arteta is the only one who's managed to get away without winning anything at the big clubs really
 
Daniel Levy, you are such a bellend that my brother has decided that he is going to follow Wrexham, and I quote, “The people in charge there actually want to get the team to succeed.”

Of Tottenham, he says, “Also, Tottenham are shite. My desire to support them is at an all time low - not because of the team, but because the people in charge have no desire to improve the team, but want to make their billion pound investment bigger.”

You massive helmet-cheese baldcunt.
 
City, United , Liverpool & Woolwich all above us in revenue last season, Champions League and high PL finish are the big earners , concerts and NFL etc can't match the money the club can earn on the footballing side.

Yeah, but if you can spend £100m less on wages that then negates the loss of £100m of CL income (if you don’t finish top 4). He’s taken all the risk out of football, and wants to ensure control over income and expenditure. He always hated that bad luck / bad ref decision could ultimately cost the club £80m, so decided to take needing CL football out of the equation.
 
Daniel Levy, you are such a bellend that my brother has decided that he is going to follow Wrexham, and I quote, “The people in charge there actually want to get the team to succeed.”

Of Tottenham, he says, “Also, Tottenham are shite. My desire to support them is at an all time low - not because of the team, but because the people in charge have no desire to improve the team, but want to make their billion pound investment bigger.”

You massive helmet-cheese baldcunt.
I envy people or is that despise...people who can 'decide' who they support.
 
You need to decide if you are counting how much is spent in £'s or how much is spent as % of turnover. Only 6 clubs spend more than us in £'s, and that includes some clubs that have greater revenue (or are financially doped to appear so) ... Man C, Man U, Chelsea, Liverpool, etc. Villa spend more than us but only as they are heading towards financial oblivion if they do not qualify for Europe (currently sitting in 7th place).

And we spend £17M per year more than Newcastle and they are 3rd and just won a cup.

Levy could comfortably spend an extra 10% and still have by far the lowest % of turnover = be the healthiest club. But that 10% would mean an extra £52M on wages per year. We could replace 5 players who are on £100k per week with 5 players on £300k per week, and still have an incredibly well run set of accounts. So the likes of Johnson, Richarlison, Bissouma, Dragusin, Bentancur could be replaced with £300k per week players.
But we’d still have to buy those players on £300k per week. A player making that much is worth over £100m probably? So where’s the £500m - £600m in fees coming from for these five replacements? We’d maybe get £100m from the sale of the five you mentioned, but that’ll just cover agent fees and signing bonuses for the new guys.
 
Blatantly burned after one of our highest ever wage earners was a shit useless twat who took the money, never gave us anything on the pitch then left on a free.

Maybe if we didn't buy one season wonders, that wouldn't happen.
club had its pants pulled down on that. thats what happens when you dont know what youre doing.... if youre gonna be splashing big dough you better have people that have an idea on what they are doing.
 
Here it is:


View: https://x.com/lastwordonspurs/status/1911855044384653534?s=46

The first leaks suggesting they will find someone else and that the squad is good enough as is.

Cover for not spending in summer me thinks

New manager will simply be asked to win with the same schlubs. Turn water into wine and maybe we’ll spend a few tokens next summer.

the squad is a lot better than this tho that is obvious. the front line yet again needs upgrades, especially wingers. then they need a new CM...then the squad is knocking top 4. its all very achievable with one good summer window and a proper manager.
 
the squad is a lot better than this tho that is obvious. the front line yet again needs upgrades, especially wingers. then they need a new CM...then the squad is knocking top 4. its all very achievable with one good summer window and a proper manager.
With a competent manager we should be in the top half, I agree. I think the squad is farther off than one transfer window from going higher even if we had a motivated board.
 
With a competent manager we should be in the top half, I agree. I think the squad is farther off than one transfer window from going higher even if we had a motivated board.

The fact of the matter is, that our 'best' team is pretty decent

Vicario
Porro - Romero - VDV - Udogie
Bentencaur - Maddison
Johnson - Kulu - Son
Richarlison/Solanke

Of this lot, only Porro and Son have remained fit this season. Yet we expect the coach to compete across 4 competitions.

The issue comes with the rest of the squad provided. Either inexperienced or lack quality.

Tel, Odobert, Sarr, Kinsky, Grey, Spence, Bergvall, Dragusin - lack experience at top level and need to develop. Fine if you are surrounded by experienced players - but they aren't, they are thrown in together.
Werner, Reguillon, Bissouma, Davies - Not at the required level
 
But we’d still have to buy those players on £300k per week. A player making that much is worth over £100m probably? So where’s the £500m - £600m in fees coming from for these five replacements? We’d maybe get £100m from the sale of the five you mentioned, but that’ll just cover agent fees and signing bonuses for the new guys.
Good point. But our Net spend is right up there with the other clubs since the stadium opened. How much did we spend on the likes of Johnson, Richarlison, Solanke, Gray, Maddison etc? We need to both buy and sell better.

Personally I think that we need to stop spending on potential players now (we have enough), and buy more ‘ready now’ players on free transfers. If we drop £50m+ on Dibbling it will be a massive mistake.
 
Good point. But our Net spend is right up there with the other clubs since the stadium opened. How much did we spend on the likes of Johnson, Richarlison, Solanke, Gray, Maddison etc? We need to both buy and sell better.

Personally I think that we need to stop spending on potential players now (we have enough), and buy more ‘ready now’ players on free transfers. If we drop £50m+ on Dibbling it will be a massive mistake.
Bu Dibling is only on 5K a week at Southampton! We can put Dibling on low low wages so we should pay at least 50M.
 
The fact of the matter is, that our 'best' team is pretty decent

Vicario
Porro - Romero - VDV - Udogie
Bentencaur - Maddison
Johnson - Kulu - Son
Richarlison/Solanke

Of this lot, only Porro and Son have remained fit this season. Yet we expect the coach to compete across 4 competitions.

The issue comes with the rest of the squad provided. Either inexperienced or lack quality.

Tel, Odobert, Sarr, Kinsky, Grey, Spence, Bergvall, Dragusin - lack experience at top level and need to develop. Fine if you are surrounded by experienced players - but they aren't, they are thrown in together.
Werner, Reguillon, Bissouma, Davies - Not at the required level
Johnson and Son LOL
 
Back
Top