• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management Levy / ENIC

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Levy In or Levy Out


  • Total voters
    343
Probably bangs in a good 70 hours a week for 25 years. Gets well rewarded for it mind you.

Don’t know how you can look at the infrastructure of the club, the money that’s been spent and think he doesn’t want what’s best. He’s not delivered it, but I’d be stunned if it wasn’t for the want of trying.
Come on you're more clever than this.

He wants what will inflate the club's asset value the most, for no investment from ENIC themselves. It's as plain as the nose on our faces. This is "best" for the owners but NOT the fans.
 
Well it seems our experiment with having a nepo baby intern for 25 years has not been a very good idea.

We seem to get shafted every which way . I could live with a deeply unpleasant bastard owning and running the club if success was delivered. But oh no we have to add penny pinching and incompetent to our cocktail of self inflicted disaster .

I would not take Donald Trump or Putin as a new owner right now , other than that I am good with almost anyone.
Fight's on.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqLZKeb5YVE
 
Come on you're more clever than this.

La Xbox GIF
 
Last time I checked, Brighton didn't reach a league cup Semi and weren't in the QF's of Europa. Our net spend over the last 5 years on transfers is HALF A BILLION. Brighton is 70m. We've spend almost double what Liverpool have.

Problem we have is that we cannot attract world class players. There are 10 clubs+ that they would prefer to play for; and without Champions League; we are not shopping in the same market as the top clubs - and therefore the fans need to temper their expectations. Spurs are NOT a big club with regards to achievements and reputation. They are a small club, that got lucky that Bale & Kane were world class players.

Smart transfer business means finding more Dele, Eriksen type deals; and investing in the academy to provide a steady flow of quality. Not spending money on players with big reputations or has-beens (.e.g. Felix, Coutinho, Sancho), and certainly not spending huge money on mid level journey men like Richarlison and Solanke.

lol, and people call negative posters gooners .. fuck me.

This is where it’s at. Play down the potential of the club (which is huge btw) and advocate for keeping us in the mud with this shit manager and crap board.

This is the post of someone who has contempt for the club and thinks we should all be happy with what we have. And it oozes (to a lesser degree, you’re very obvious) out of every post from people who have supported this shitshow for years.
 
Come on you're more clever than this.

He wants what will inflate the club's asset value the most, for no investment from ENIC themselves. It's as plain as the nose on our faces. This is "best" for the owners but NOT the fans
It seems some people just can't handle the fact they've been so wrong about someone for so long. Blind denial sets in.

Reminds me of a guy that used to drink with us every Saturday night.

For years it was common knowledge his missus had been screwing around like a good 'un

We'd all been there ouselves for a dabble. Each and everyone of us.
We'd even be sat round the table supping away and she'd have her hand under the table massaging the balls of the geezer sat next to her and he was totally oblivious. Smiling away and joining in the convo.

This was years ago. Funny thing is though I bumped into them in Asda a couple of months ago. They're still together
 
ClubTotal gate receipts 23-24
Real Madrid£153m
PSG£139m
Woolwich£127m
Bayern Munich£109m
Man Utd£107m
L'il ol Tottenham£102m
Barcelona£96m
Liverpool£90m
Man City£74m
Chelsea£71m
AC Milan£71m
Atletico Madrid£61m
Marseille£56m
Inter Milan£55m

and the above was without any extra european games and very early cup exits.
I may be wrong here, but I'm pretty sure that EVERY club in that list (apart from us) have won their respective Leagues/and or Major European honours in the last 20-25 years! (or since we've had ENIC)

Except US!

Our figures just don't add up to everyone else's spending power & success!

...we really are a class apart!!
 
Come on you're more clever than this.

He wants what will inflate the club's asset value the most, for no investment from ENIC themselves. It's as plain as the nose on our faces. This is "best" for the owners but NOT the fans.
Just because he is doing things to increase the value of the investment, doesn’t mean that those things can’t also be good for the club.

Both increased investment value and club betterment can be true at once.

Was signing Solanke at £65m or signing Chris Wood for £15m to increase the value of the investment, or was it to try to make the football team better?
 
As I read somewhere else.

Conte had us above them just 3 years ago. They were floundering on Thursday nights as we took they're CL spot. We were ranked the wealthier club

They then showed real ambition signing Top class players for Big fees on Big wages.

We sold our best player, signed a creche, and butchered the wage bill to save money and fund a hotel

Then Levy releases that arrogant, patronising statement last week.

Shameful

Levy OUT!


View: https://x.com/ChangeForSpurs/status/1908850105622405170?t=4U1DP2jyqxCJlyitdQnmCQ&s=19

I know Conte is now a reviled figure in this place, but he is the only manager since Poch who has ever had us looking like the club were about to take the next step. Fourth, CL qualification, playing really well at the time.

Levy’s reaction to a lack of success is a lack of investment, and his reaction to success like that was shown to be a lack of investment. If you are Levy and see Conte succeeding with what he’s got, why spend more?

Currently has Napoli 2nd in the table as well.

Perhaps both our managers from that season will meet in the CL next year as the boss of ‘lesser’ clubs

:contehandshead:
 
Just because he is doing things to increase the value of the investment, doesn’t mean that those things can’t also be good for the club.

Both increased investment value and club betterment can be true at once.

Was signing Solanke at £65m or signing Chris Wood for £15m to increase the value of the investment, or was it to try to make the football team better?
Come on mate, enough now. There really is nowhere left to hide what Levy and ENIC have done.
 
Just because he is doing things to increase the value of the investment, doesn’t mean that those things can’t also be good for the club.

Both increased investment value and club betterment can be true at once.

Was signing Solanke at £65m or signing Chris Wood for £15m to increase the value of the investment, or was it to try to make the football team better?

Yeah the likes of Solanke are the classic shit the club pulls.

On the surface, ambition. In reality, a relatively low wage player. They’d never spend that fee or more on a player who would also command 150k+ a week.

The Solanke signing btw coming a whole season after we lost the best striker in the world who was on triple the wages.

Johnson, Solanke etc - relative high fees but nice low wage bill and supplement with some children. Call it ambitious squad building and point to transfer fees invested.

ITS A SCAM.
 
Yeah the likes of Solanke are the classic shit the club pulls.

On the surface, ambition. In reality, a relatively low wage player. They’d never spend that fee or more on a player who would also command 150k+ a week.

The Solanke signing btw coming a whole season after we lost the best striker in the world who was on triple the wages.

Johnson, Solanke etc - relative high fees but nice low wage bill and supplement with some children. Call it ambitious squad building and point to transfer fees invested.

ITS A SCAM.
Well exactly. Solanke after selling Kane was a £35m profit plus £5m+ a year wages saved. And for all his reasonable merits, a huge downgrade.
 
Well exactly. Solanke after selling Kane was a £35m profit plus £5m+ a year wages saved. And for all his reasonable merits, a huge downgrade.

Watch the Son replacement be pathetic as well.

It’ll be some kid for a relatively high fee, or some domestic mid table player who is decent for 50-60m but commands 1/3 of the wage a Son would and has nowhere near the potential.

Losing two bonafide world class players and replacing them with Brennans or Solanke’s and we’re meant to see this as ambition .. meanwhile the wage bill shrinks ever smaller.
 
Yeah the likes of Solanke are the classic shit the club pulls.

On the surface, ambition. In reality, a relatively low wage player. They’d never spend that fee or more on a player who would also command 150k+ a week.

The Solanke signing btw coming a whole season after we lost the best striker in the world who was on triple the wages.

Johnson, Solanke etc - relative high fees but nice low wage bill and supplement with some children. Call it ambitious squad building and point to transfer fees invested.

ITS A SCAM.
Every Levy "big signing" is a player who seems to him to be a bargain, whom they think they can get on low wages. That's the only circumstance under which he's willing to pay a big transfer fee.

And as everyone but Daniel Levy knows, there's a reason why players like Ndombele or Richarlison or Solanke etc are available at what seems like a bargain rate. Because there's a club anxious to be rid of that player, the player is below the notice of big clubs, or both.

When lesser clubs are anxious to be rid of a player or when big clubs consider that player below their standard, perhaps instead of being in a rush to buy on the cheap, Levy should be asking why that player is good enough for us.
 
Every Levy "big signing" is a player who seems to him to be a bargain, whom they think they can get on low wages. That's the only circumstance under which he's willing to pay a big transfer fee.

And as everyone but Daniel Levy knows, there's a reason why players like Ndombele or Richarlison or Solanke etc are available at what seems like a bargain rate. Because there's a club anxious to be rid of that player, the player is below the notice of big clubs, or both.

When lesser clubs are anxious to be rid of a player or when big clubs consider that player below their standard, perhaps instead of being in a rush to buy on the cheap, Levy should be asking why that player is good enough for us.

Ndombele was probably the only high risk high potential signing we’ve made. Good wage and fee, high ceiling. We sort of had to do it after making a CL final and having not spent a penny for fucking years on the squad.

And somehow the club completely fucked it by deciding to take that plunge on a player with documented attitude issues .. now we will never do it again.
 
Back
Top