With us probably having to sell to buy this summer I suspect he wont be the only one seeing it as a good opportunity to leave this sinking ship.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
oh fuck off you sad little manLast time I checked, Brighton didn't reach a league cup Semi and weren't in the QF's of Europa. Our net spend over the last 5 years on transfers is HALF A BILLION. Brighton is 70m. We've spend almost double what Liverpool have.
Problem we have is that we cannot attract world class players. There are 10 clubs+ that they would prefer to play for; and without Champions League; we are not shopping in the same market as the top clubs - and therefore the fans need to temper their expectations. Spurs are NOT a big club with regards to achievements and reputation. They are a small club, that got lucky that Bale & Kane were world class players.
Smart transfer business means finding more Dele, Eriksen type deals; and investing in the academy to provide a steady flow of quality. Not spending money on players with big reputations or has-beens (.e.g. Felix, Coutinho, Sancho), and certainly not spending huge money on mid level journey men like Richarlison and Solanke.
Do you think if we paid more wages we would improve our record of getting the right player?Utd pay elite wages, as do Chelsea. They’re still struggling relatively. Liverpool have a lower wage to turnover ratio than all the other top clubs, they’re still winning the league.
It’s not that simplistic, pay more wages win more. You need to get the right players and our problem is we’re not very good at doing that. People not acknowledging that and just blindly just wanting us to pay more is a little bit naive.
But I get it wage to turnover is now the buzz phrase. It used to be net spend and eventually it’ll be something else.
I think more likely is we get more underachievers on bigger money. This club isn’t viewed as a serious place to win things. The Academy is pretty much fucking worthless in terms of producing first team players. The coaching and recruitment structure is bush league bullshit. Until we remove Levy and have an re-organised footballing structure it’s all fucked.Do you think if we paid more wages we would improve our record of getting the right player?
Do you think there is any correlation between what someone is paid and how good they are?
Say like buy Odbert or Neto /Eze?
embarrassing yourself yet againHang on; half the people are banging on here that the Europa League is a 2nd rate cup. But our previous win was a major cup?
And winning the league back before colour TV doesn't make Spurs a big club now.
I don't really refer the club as 'WE' since I am not on the staff and not a player. I am NOT part of the club. I am a supporter - so I reserve 'WE' when talking about the fans.
There are two problems with LevyThere is a lot more to it than increasing the wage bill to turnover ratio. This is being parroted as a simple fix for everything and it’s not.
I don't think that is what is being said at all... I think the argument is that a club our size should not be 20th in this metric... we should be 5th or 6th because that's where our income is. Fully accept that if we were, we might still be shit but at least you're perceived to be trying... every other club is zigging (showing the maximum ambition they can) and we are zagging (showing the minimum ambition we can) - why? Because funds are needed for other projects and non football related stuff. There are 20 business in the Prem League. 19 are primarily run as football clubs, the other one is a portfolio of assets funded by a 140 year old iconic sporting brand.I think more likely is we get more underachievers on bigger money. This club isn’t viewed as a serious place to win things. The Academy is pretty much fucking worthless in terms of producing first team players. The coaching and recruitment structure is bush league bullshit. Until we remove Levy and have an re-organised footballing structure it’s all fucked.
But it’s easier to just say spend more on wages and we’ll start winning. That’s a pipe dream. 2 of the biggest earners Son and Werner are regularly 2 of the worst performers. Ndombele was a total disaster, he was on huge money.
There is a lot more to it than increasing the wage bill to turnover ratio. This is being parroted as a simple fix for everything and it’s not.
It is standard practice. What if the previous new west stand was not devalued. It would once demolished and no longer in existence have been taken out of 1 year's accounts giving us a massive loss. There is nothing sinister in devaluing your assets.The stadium is being depreciated on the accounts though. I presume it is all perfectly above board. Yes it isn't actually dropping in market value at anything like the stated rate, so it's a useful way to keep tax liabilities down, I presume.
It’s a non cash expense - so who cares about a massive loss caused by an accounting concept which is to do with when you can expense capital spending for tax purposes - Depreciation has NOTHING to do with how much cash is available to spend so it’s a load of crap when Levy points at losses which include depreciation as the reason there’s no money available for transfers/player wages - it’s a f’in con.It is standard practice. What if the previous new west stand was not devalued. It would once demolished and no longer in existence have been taken out of 1 year's accounts giving us a massive loss. There is nothing sinister in devaluing your assets.
I have had another look at the accounts. On page 34 of the accounts it shows the Stadium was depreciated by £50m but then they had it revalued and the value magically went up by £50m leaving the value of the stadium the same as the previous year.It’s a non cash expense - so who cares about a massive loss caused by an accounting concept which is to do with when you can expense capital spending for tax purposes - Depreciation has NOTHING to do with how much cash is available to spend so it’s a load of crap when Levy points at losses which include depreciation as the reason there’s no money available for transfers/player wages - it’s a f’in con.
I just don’t get why they are so desperate for us to remain trophy-less & be an average team. Desperate for us not to compete at the top with our biggest rival. Worlds gone mad!lol, and people call negative posters gooners .. fuck me.
This is where it’s at. Play down the potential of the club (which is huge btw) and advocate for keeping us in the mud with this shit manager and crap board.
This is the post of someone who has contempt for the club and thinks we should all be happy with what we have. And it oozes (to a lesser degree, you’re very obvious) out of every post from people who have supported this shitshow for years.
With all due respect are you ever gonna fuck off ?Last time I checked, Brighton didn't reach a league cup Semi and weren't in the QF's of Europa. Our net spend over the last 5 years on transfers is HALF A BILLION. Brighton is 70m. We've spend almost double what Liverpool have.
Problem we have is that we cannot attract world class players. There are 10 clubs+ that they would prefer to play for; and without Champions League; we are not shopping in the same market as the top clubs - and therefore the fans need to temper their expectations. Spurs are NOT a big club with regards to achievements and reputation. They are a small club, that got lucky that Bale & Kane were world class players.
Smart transfer business means finding more Dele, Eriksen type deals; and investing in the academy to provide a steady flow of quality. Not spending money on players with big reputations or has-beens (.e.g. Felix, Coutinho, Sancho), and certainly not spending huge money on mid level journey men like Richarlison and Solanke.
I was arguing this with many on here back in the no signings summer window years ago. I ended up sarcastically saying how well Chelsea have done despite their huge wage bill. & more recently Pep’s a genius winning all those trophies at city despite the huge wage bill. It’s an annoying way to give an example. But I don’t know how else to get the penny to drop.There is an incredibly easily measurable correlation between wage spend and success lol, it’s not opinion it’s fact. Of fucking course that doesn’t mean spend big wages for the sake of it or ineptly like Manchester United, nobody is asking for that..
But clubs that constantly stay in their box are never likely to challenge. We have always been more cowardly with spending. We’d never have invested the 100m in Rice for example with a 200k+ a week wage too.
When are we ever in for a top table player like that? Never. So we never make that next step at all. Van Djik and Alisson took Liverpool there - anyone see Levy making signings of that calibre?
There’s no reason we can’t btw. We are a wealthy London club. We can challenge for top tier talent but we settle for Solanke, Johnson and some kids. Well we don’t, but we know the fans who do.. they’re in this thread with us.
Solanke for example - good player tbf. Never a Kane replacement. You replace elite with Solanke, Maddison, Johnson (good mid table talent) .. you’ll finish where you deserve.
Some people are happy with this. Again, we know who they are. They deserve everything they get tbh. Apparently they don’t really care anyway, which is nice.
Well there’s obviously some correlation, we sold a 100m striker and have since gone through two 60m strikers and have seen a precipitous drop in qualityDo you think if we paid more wages we would improve our record of getting the right player?
Do you think there is any correlation between what someone is paid and how good they are?
Say like buy Odbert or Neto /Eze?
He just needs to tell them how everyone got a watch in 2019 for tryingHopefully Daniel can rally the team for the second leg with stories of when he was put in charge of the pencil sharpener at school .
We an do this , we just need Daniel to inspire us
I think more likely is we get more underachievers on bigger money. This club isn’t viewed as a serious place to win things. The Academy is pretty much fucking worthless in terms of producing first team players. The coaching and recruitment structure is bush league bullshit. Until we remove Levy and have an re-organised footballing structure it’s all fucked.
But it’s easier to just say spend more on wages and we’ll start winning. That’s a pipe dream. 2 of the biggest earners Son and Werner are regularly 2 of the worst performers. Ndombele was a total disaster, he was on huge money.
There is a lot more to it than increasing the wage bill to turnover ratio. This is being parroted as a simple fix for everything and it’s not.
I have had another look at the accounts. On page 34 of the accounts it shows the Stadium was depreciated by £50m but then they had it revalued and the value magically went up by £50m leaving the value of the stadium the same as the previous year.
As to cash flow which I agree is very important on page 23 it shows cash declined from £173m to £78m at a time when they had just received the Season ticket money and were in the middle of a transfer window.
on Page 49 it lists the players bought & sold after the balance sheet date which included Solanke with a net cost of £42m.
They really do not have a load of cash lying around
Their options are
1 More borrowing including buying players on credit. They do a lot of this and I think a big reason why they buy certain players and not others depends on whether they have to pay the whole fee up front or not. You still have to pay the cost of borrowing and I expect that player deferred payments increase the fee overall.
2 ENIC put money in themselves. I read they did make a sum of £100m available previously and on page 46 in the 2023 accounts there is a share capital increase of £100m but but not sure if that is it. I cannot see any more on the horizon
3 They get external Investors which has not happened.
Therefore for things to change we either need to increase our income or someone needs to put money in.
We won't be in Europe so sell the womens team to yourself for 200m, sell Mario Cart business to yourself for 100m, sell Johnson to the Womens team for 50m, sell future Beyonce ticket sales for 30m and hey presto I've raised 380m