• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfer Other Team Transfers

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Liverpool are ready to rival Real Madrid in trying to sign Paris St-Germain's France forward Kylian Mbappe, 24, with a bid of more than 300m euros (£258m), according to Fifa agent Marco Kirdemir. (Marca)

Biggest load of bollocks this year so far!
 
Apparently West Ham have rejected Woolwich's newest bid of 100m + add ons and are getting pissed off with their payment structure.

Whilst it'd be hilarious to see them spend 200m on Rice, Havertz and Timber. It'd be even more hilarious if they lost Rice to City.
 
Yeah, although I guess in the current market he's about as close to a guaranteed upgrade as it's possible to get - young, homegrown, proven in the same league, top level experience with England.

So £105m is insane, but we spent £85m on N'Dombele and Lo Celso for virtually no return.

I still think it's far too high.
 
Whilst I agree 105 million for Rice is somewhat excessive, they’re going to build their team around him, and the backing the Woolwich board have given to Arteta is infuriatingly admirable.
 
Whilst I agree 105 million for Rice is somewhat excessive, they’re going to build their team around him, and the backing the Woolwich board have given to Arteta is infuriatingly admirable.
It'll be an immediate upgrade on Partey, despite the eye watering price tag.

Slightly annoying but I hope it means they've blown their wad on these overpriced Rice and Havertz deals. I still don't think they end up with the same obscene fortune week in and week out that they benefitted from this season.
 
Whilst I agree 105 million for Rice is somewhat excessive, they’re going to build their team around him, and the backing the Woolwich board have given to Arteta is infuriatingly admirable.
We coughed up (fairly) big money for Ndombele and when it went tits up I think the board collectively decided they won't ever push the boat out like they did with that transfer so sub 50m is where they feel safest.
 
Whilst I agree 105 million for Rice is somewhat excessive, they’re going to build their team around him, and the backing the Woolwich board have given to Arteta is infuriatingly admirable.

Yeh he is really good, not as good on the ball as Partey but a bit better defensively, less injury prone and without potential rape charges coming his way. Means they can dispose of Partey and his problems.
 
The price is the price I suppose, they won't give a fuck about that if he turns out to be a success for them, he's a good player as well which is really annoying.

Woolwich are doing things we should have done when we were in our prime with Poch which is really frustrating watching them learn from our mistakes, hopefully we can get back on track.
 
It'll be an immediate upgrade on Partey, despite the eye watering price tag.

Slightly annoying but I hope it means they've blown their wad on these overpriced Rice and Havertz deals. I still don't think they end up with the same obscene fortune week in and week out that they benefitted from this season.
He’s going to be the backbone of their team, so is 100 million really that excessive?

They’ve also gone and beaten Manchester City to him, a team many of the conservative fans amongst us will perpetually claim we nor any other non state/oil backed team should even dream of competing with.
 
He’s going to be the backbone of their team, so is 100 million really that excessive?

They’ve also gone and beaten Manchester City to him, a team many of the conservative fans amongst us will perpetually claim we nor any other non state/oil backed team should even dream of competing with.

Yes. Anyone with a brain will know that £100m is excessive.
 
Back
Top