That’s mental money.
Obviously not exactly comparable situations, but this underscores what a great deal we pulled off for Bissouma.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
That’s mental money.
Obviously not exactly comparable situations, but this underscores what a great deal we pulled off for Bissouma.
He is on huge wages, either psg keep him and pay 25m a year for a bench player or let him go for a small fee... Or sell him to Saudi who offered 100m when no one else is offering 50m. There was no market for him.
Why would PSG let him go for a small fee when he is worth much more to them, that doesn't make any sense?
Despite not having a market players still hold some value, letting go of someone like Neymar who has 4 years left on his deal represents huge value to PSG.
Chelski don't have much to show for what they have spent. Bigger turnround than us.
He is costing them 25m to sit on the bench, they do not want him there. How is he worth more to them?
Why would we let ndombele go for a small fee.
If he’s on about 40M per season then better off rid I guess
Because despite not being in the managers plans players don't just suddenly lose their value, a player like Neymar is still one of the best players in the world AND not to mention the commercial value he brings to the club, you don't let someone with that kind of clout go for cheap.
I don't understand why it would be dodgy according to you? What kind of foul play do you envisage happening here? and if so for what reason would there be dodginess?
And what the heck does Ndombele have to do with this? lmao
I really want to see a Swiss ramble type forensic look at how Chelsea are spending all this money on fees and wages within the ffp accounting phase (amortisation is obviously one trick) and what the long term ramifications are in terms of finances and ffp going forward.
This level of spending and number of players in a short space of time is unprecedented, never seen anything like it.
This level of spending and number of players in a short space of time is unprecedented, never seen anything like it.
He has no value if you are paying 25m on wages and not playing him. I've explained my thoughts a few times. Have a nice day.
That doesn't make sense at all but okay.
Even if they are breaking FFP they will just pay a small fine so what does it really matter? The game is fucked
Might not have the money to pay it one go so may have had to go higher to pay it of over a few years.
I guess not, but with other clubs looming one would expect triggering the clause to be a safer bet.
That graphic looks like Big Gay Al from South Park wearing a wizards hat.
Can they match chelseas 9 year deal though lol. Crazy club
That's a matter for the player; not Palace.
