I wouldn’t mind him at all, If PEH leaves we’ll need another midfielder anyway.
Looked pretty good yesterday.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Looked pretty good yesterday.
Another one that we have been repeatedly linked with:
Brighton identify Lille's €30m-rated Carlos Baleba as Moises Caicedo replacement, opening offer submitted - Get French Football News
Fabrizio Romano is reporting that Brighton and Hove Albion have identified Lille OSC's Carlos Baleba (19) as Moises Caicedo's replacement. The Ecuadorian
www.getfootballnewsfrance.com
He will play this season and be sold for triple next summerBrighton identify Lille's €30m-rated Carlos Baleba as Moises Caicedo replacement, opening offer submitted - Get French Football News
Fabrizio Romano is reporting that Brighton and Hove Albion have identified Lille OSC's Carlos Baleba (19) as Moises Caicedo's replacement. The Ecuadorian
Brighton identify Lille's €30m-rated Carlos Baleba as Moises Caicedo replacement, opening offer submitted - Get French Football News
Fabrizio Romano is reporting that Brighton and Hove Albion have identified Lille OSC's Carlos Baleba (19) as Moises Caicedo's replacement. The Ecuadorian
Any good? If he is let's get in there before Brighton!!
Jack Harrison: Everton seal season-long loan deal for Leeds United winger
Jack Harrison to join Everton on a season-long loan without an option to buy; Leeds winger was a target for Aston Villa but they ended their interest; Harrison expected to be out for around three to four weeks; deal includes a release clause which can be invoked during loan spell
Seen almost nothing of him. Only made 5 starts last year.
Woolwich signed another keeper, Raya from Brentford! They do realise they can only have one on the pitch at any given time ,don't they?
having two number 1's seems like a quick way to have players turn against you when they hit a rough patch
Apparently there is one (and to be fair for £35m he would be an excellent signing for many teams)
So Chelsea have spent what, 900 million since Boehly and his consortium took over?
When does it end? How are they expecting to stay within FFP?
When does it end? How are they expecting to stay within FFP?
Wicked fee.
So here’s the bit I don’t understand (not an accountant in any way shape or form).
If you can ‘amortise’ (if that’s a verb) the value of a contract for any given year, and essentially divide your expenditure by the length of the contract, why do you also get to benefit from the full value of a sale immediately?
So, you have 100 million pound player on a ten year contract and can say ‘I’ve only spent 10 million this year’. Fine.
But for Havertz by way of example, they’re claiming the full value of his sale immediately to the tune of 65 million. Shouldn’t the same principle apply; they only get the annual value of that sale, being whatever Woolwich give them this calendar year?
You amortise the cost of an asset over it's lifetime. When they get rid of an asset (havertz) they don't have it anymore the value is realised. If he has 30m amortized left it's fee minus amortized 65m-30m=35m is added to the books.
It's why selling kids /free transfers is good for your ffp as the fee all revenue no need to take amortized cost off.
Chelsea are banking on ffp going away or Saudis always buying their players otherwise they are kicking the issues on a few years only
They're not quite taking the full amount Havertz. They did on Mount though, because he was academy, and had a value of zero on their balance sheet.
Basically you/they can only benefit from the amount not "amortised away" yet. In your example, 100m over 10 years. If they sell said player again after 1 year for 100m, they have amortised 10m, and are now selling a 90m asset (as far as, in their books) for 100m, so their benefit is 10m. Sell him for 100m after five years they benefit 50m, because they've amortised the other 50m.