-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
VAR CHECKING POST FOR BOLLOCKS...
What is this nonsense with
The Dealer
giving disagrees left, right & centre on every ratings thread? If your ratings are different to someone else's, of course you disagree with the person, but we don't all go around hitting the disagree button for that, do we? Weird.
I think he's just trolling, so I've foul voted his 'off topic derailment' post, for that reason.
I think he's just trolling, so I've foul voted his 'off topic derailment' post, for that reason.
Absolutely. It's standard practice. But that's not what's going on here - not by any stretch of the imagination. What's going on here is weird, deluded and quite pathetic control freakery.
He’s trying to sabotage the thread because no one participated in his shit ratings thread.
Deleted member 13260
Guest
You fail to understand and provide no explanation.
If one poster rates all 11 players as 9s then you go and rate them all as 7s, it's essentially the same rating as you because they are relative. They would impact on the overall average exactly the same, because the overall average is a list of all Spurs players ordered by their mean average.
Don't you get it ? You disagree with ratings which are relatively similar to your own!
Just because you think a 9 should be less achievable. You are ridiculous.
He's not just disagreeing with the ratings though, he's saying other people's opinions are wrong
This is what he said on page 3 of this thread
"The ratings I have disagreed with are nonsense, not me disagreeing with them. I am trying to make posters think harder about their ratings that are clearly wrong."
...but the discussion is about why you're such a dickhead - and nothing to do with the thread topic.
Not sure if these are good enough to make the dealer’s favorite list of ratings. At least one of your selections is probably 1.80 or greater away from the mean rating given by the media.
How dare you.
He dislikes Vicario and wants Fraser Forster as the main goalkeeper.
Deleted member 13260
Guest
You click disagree and give no reason.
Simply trolling or genuinely believe your opinion is correct, and others are wrong.
But YOU are wrong.
Deleted member 13260
Guest
He doesn't even post his own ratings.
Just agrees with a few people each week (even if they are quite different ratings to each other) and disagrees with dozens on a quick glance.
Then posts this trollop as though it means something.. we can only assume that this media average in their opinion is more correct than the forum average.
Yet when you break it down, the media average, his agree average, disagree average and total forum average all follow a strikingly similar correlation (with the exception of Davies), albeit starting from a 1-2 point higher 'base line'.
What this poster doesn't like is to see high ratings for players. He thinks it's 'more correct' that player ratings start from a lower base line but doesn't consider the ratings relative to other player ratings.
So disagrees to make a point they don't quite understand what point they're trying to make themselves fully - hence they are an idiot.
If you rate any player 9+ this moron will click disagree. It's as simple as that.
Having gone through their agrees / disagrees, I can't find an exception to this rule.
I do that cos you act like a dick.
If you just accepted people's opinions and stopped being so high and mighty, then I'd score properly.
If you just accepted people's opinions and stopped being so high and mighty, then I'd score properly.
To be fair it's an emotional rating. I say fair fucks to him.That Bentancur rating will make his head explode!
There's a world of difference between disgreeing with someone's ratings of players and 'giving disagrees' to loads of people on a ratings thread. Don't you see that?
He's trolling.
Deleted member 13260
Guest
Dodged actually answering again. Just backs up you're trolling.
It's on you to justify the disagrees. You think scrolling through glancing briefly and disagreeing with dozens of ratings posts warrants those posters to all come back and justify their individual ratings to you?
Can you not see why you have got that completely the wrong way round? You spend 30 seconds clicking disagree wildly then would expect hours of man hours in responses?
Think about your ridiculousness.