Player Ratings: Crystal Palace (h) 1-0

[The Dealer]

Discussion point. Hojbjerg ratings from 1 to 7 on this forum.
The media rated him at 7 mostly so far.

 

[Starks]

Forster - 6
Royal - 7
Romero - 8
Lenglet - 6
Porro - 7
Hojbjerg - 6
Skipp - 6
Davies - 6
Richarlison - 6
Son - 7
Kane - 8

 

[Ulrika Jonsson]

Forster: 7
Royal: 8
Dier: 5
Porro: 7
Lenglet: 7
Romero: 7
Davies: 6
Skipp: 5
Højbjerg: 6
Son: 8
Richarlison: 6
Kane: 8
Kulusevski: 5
Danjuma: 5

 

[bonaspur23]

Forster: 7
Royal: 7
Porro: 6
Lenglet: 7
Romero: 8
Davies: 8
Skipp: 8
Højbjerg: 7
Son: 6
Richarlison: 6
Kane: 6

Not sure we watched the same game.

 

[bonaspur23]

Discussion point. Hojbjerg ratings from 1 to 7 on this forum.
The media rated him at 7 mostly so far.

They probably watched the highlights and saw his one decent run forward. But he was pretty anonymous and his was only on the winning team because he had Harry Kane on his side.

Was even anonymous on our goal. Ball started at royal and went, Romero, lenglet, Skipp, lenglet, Davies, Kane, porro, Kane.

 

[zin]

Discussion point. Hojbjerg ratings from 1 to 7 on this forum.
The media rated him at 7 mostly so far.

Media giving a 7 is quite generous. As for rating of 1 here, I had to show ignored content to find it so suggest you also ignore it for your forum average as you normally would?

 

[Steve73]

Forster: 6
Royal: 7
Dier: 2
Porro: 7
Lenglet: 6
Romero: 6
Davies: 5
Skipp: 6
Højbjerg: 6
Son: 7
Richarlison: 5
Kane: 7
Kulusevski: 2
Danjuma: 2

 

[McCOYS]

Forster: 8
Royal: 8
Dier: 5
Porro: 7
Lenglet: 7
Romero: 8
Davies: 6
Skipp: 6
Højbjerg: 6
Son: 6
Richarlison: 5
Kane: 8
Kulusevski: 5
Danjuma: 5

 

[mummy]

Not sure we watched the same game.

Numbers are only opinions.

 

[The Dealer]

Media giving a 7 is quite generous. As for rating of 1 here, I had to show ignored content to find it so suggest you also ignore it for your forum average as you normally would?

Quite a few have suggested just numbers are boring. I don't put anyone on ignore, never have. I would rather try and talk it through. As I did with this 1 to 7. Posters want discussion so let's talk about it.
I was challenged on a 3 rating for Forster last time out and provided my marksheet.

 

[SpiderSpurs]

Forster: 6
Royal: 7
Porro: 4
Lenglet: 4
Romero: 5
Davies: 5
Skipp: 4
Højbjerg: 6
Son: 5
Richarlison: 5
Kane: 6

 

[SpiderSpurs]

Now, this is very nifty!

 

[Maureen]

Didn’t see the gane but what was rich like?

 

[Henry Hotspur]

Didn’t see the gane but what was rich like?

Anonymous mostly. When not, he was offside

 

[Maureen]

Anonymous mostly. When not, he was offside

Typical, whoever wanted him needs shooting. I know people criticise gio and tangay but I’m sure they had much better output than rich.

 

[Crocker]

Forster: 7
Royal: 7
Dier: 5
Porro: 7
Lenglet: 7
Romero: 7
Davies: 6
Skipp: 5
Højbjerg: 5
Son: 6
Richarlison: 7
Kane: 7
Kulusevski: 6
Danjuma: 6
Submit your ratings | View match averages | View season averages

 

[cretinousgoat]

Forster: 7
Royal: 7
Dier: 4
Porro: 8
Lenglet: 7
Romero: 8
Davies: 6
Skipp: 5
Højbjerg: 4
Son: 6
Richarlison: 6
Kane: 8
Kulusevski: 4
Danjuma: 4
Submit your ratings | View match averages | View season averages

 

[Get in!]

Forster: 8
Royal: 8
Porro: 7
Lenglet: 8
Romero: 8
Davies: 8
Skipp: 7
Højbjerg: 8
Son: 6
Richarlison: 6
Kane: 8
Submit your ratings | View match averages | View season averages

 

[Get in!]

Forster: 8
Royal: 8
Porro: 7
Lenglet: 8
Romero: 8
Davies: 8
Skipp: 7
Højbjerg: 8
Son: 6
Richarlison: 6
Kane: 8
Submit your ratings | View match averages | View season averages

 

[OffTheBench]

Forster: 6
Royal: 7
Porro: 7
Lenglet: 6
Romero: 7
Davies: 6
Skipp: 6
Højbjerg: 6
Son: 7
Richarlison: 6
Kane: 8
Submit your ratings | View match averages | View season averages