Player Ratings: Fulham (h) 2-0

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort by date Sort by reaction score

Player ratings vs Fulham

Romero: 8.48
Maddison: 8.45
Vicario: 8.34
Postecoglou: 8.28
Son: 8.25
van de Ven: 8.18
Porro: 7.44
Højbjerg: 7.40
Udogie: 7.38
Kulusevski: 7.01
Sarr: 6.88
Richarlison: 6.83
Royal: 6.34
Lo Celso: 5.89
Veliz: 5.79
Skipp: 5.74
Johnson: 5.66
 
Media/ Web ratings across 10 reports including Football London, Evening Std, 90 mins, Sky, We are Tottenham, Times, Star, Telegraph, Mail and Mirror.

Vicario.....7.80
Porro........7.15
Romero...7.50
Vdv............7.55
Udogie.....6.90
Hojbjerg..7.25
Sarr............6.70
Maddis.... 8.45
Kulusevs 6.75
Son.............8.50
Richarlis...7.10
Royal..........5.95
Skipp..........5.90
 
Average player ratings v Fulham across only 8 Forum ratings this time and 10 media/web.
First column is forum, second media, third a combined average and 4th the pure actual forum average.

Vicario 7.62, 7.80, 7.72, 8.35
Porro....6.75, 7.15, 6.97, 7.43
Romero7.93, 7.50,7.69, 8.47
Vdv........ 7.62, 7.55, 7.58,8.16
Udogie..6.75, 6.90, 6.83,7.38
Hojbjer.7.31, 7.25, 7.27,7.38
Sarr........6.25, 6.70, 6.50,6.88
Maddis.8.31, 8.45,8.38,8.43
Kulu......6.31, 6.75,6.55, 7.03
Son........7.81, 8.50 , 8.19,8.27
Richi......6.18,7.10, 6.69, 6.78
Royal.....5.75,5.95, 5.86, 6.37
Skipp.....4.87, 5.90, 5.44,5.77
 
Looking at my own ratings I didn't rate Vicario as high as the forum or media. I gave him a 7.

I was 0.43 under the forum average for Porro.

I was 0.66 under the forum on Vdv.

I was 1.62 over on Hojbjerg.

0.57 over on Maddison.

Almost a full mark under for Udogie against the forum.

0.53 under on Kulusevski.

And 1.31 under on Posto who rated that second half our worst so far this season so I don't agree with his 8.31 rating and I doubt does he !!
 
The Dealer said:
Average player ratings v Fulham across only 8 Forum ratings this time and 10 media/web.
First column is forum, second media, third a combined average and 4th the pure actual forum average.

Vicario 7.62, 7.80, 7.72, 8.35
Porro....6.75, 7.15, 6.97, 7.43
Romero7.93, 7.50,7.69, 8.47
Vdv........ 7.62, 7.55, 7.58,8.16
Udogie..6.75, 6.90, 6.83,7.38
Hojbjer.7.31, 7.25, 7.27,7.38
Sarr........6.25, 6.70, 6.50,6.88
Maddis.8.31, 8.45,8.38,8.43
Kulu......6.31, 6.75,6.55, 7.03
Son........7.81, 8.50 , 8.19,8.27
Richi......6.18,7.10, 6.69, 6.78
Royal.....5.75,5.95, 5.86, 6.37
Skipp.....4.87, 5.90, 5.44,5.77
Click to expand...
You included mine right?
 
Ex Park Lane.... said:
Skipp is better than a Four
Click to expand...

Difficult to rate the subs. They need a different criteria of judgement. They come on to either change the game, see it out or as a straight replacement for tiredness or injury.
So each one needs consideration as to whether or not they fulfilled their purpose.
Skippy understandably was a bit rusty but was at least trying some probing passes. He also got stuck into a few tackles. He needs to play and sadly it doesn't look like he will get enough time with us.

I rated Skipp a 6 but as a sub, not to be compared to 90 minute or near to players.
 
bonaspur23 said:
Postecoglou: 8
Vicario: 9
Royal: 6.5
Porro: 7
Romero: 8
Udogie: 7
van de Ven: 7.5
Skipp: 4.5
Højbjerg: 7
Sarr: 7
Maddison: 8
Lo Celso: 4
Son: 7.5
Richarlison: 6.5
Kulusevski: 7
Veliz: 6
Johnson: 5.5



Submit your ratings | View match averages | View season averages
Click to expand...

Your ratings were selected by me as one of the 7 which had a semblance of credibility. I didn't agree with all of them but thought they were fair enough.
Actually my ratings are pretty close to yours except Vicario you gave a 9, me a 7, combined result was 7.72.
Skipp you gave a 4.5, me a 6, combined result was 5.44.
Hojbjerg you gave a 7, me a 9, combined average 7.27.

So disregarding Skipp as a sub and difficult to quantify. I was closer to the Vicario combined rating and you were closer on Hojbjerg.
So an even assessment on both parts......and yet you chose to disagree with mine and I selected yours as fair. !!
 
My mark sheet for Vicario first half.
Lost ball, poor distribution lost ball, good distribution, good save.
Second half ....good save, well taken and quick throw out, poor pass lost possession.

Rating 7. One embellished save looked good but he barely had to move for it, I didn't get fooled by it, any keeper would have saved it.
There was one excellent reaction save .
4 positives and 3 negatives doesn't add up to a 9 !! He wasn't busy and his distribution was poor.

Hojbjerg first half

Good pass, good midfield play, good pass, good long pass, good defending, good midfield play, good attacking header, good interception, good mf play, good tackle, strong shot on target, good pass, good pass, good attack.

Second half

Good pass, good pass to set up goal, good attack, good pass, good defending.

Rated a 9, exceptional contribution especially considering he's been effectively frozen out. Showed bravery with some long passing, very busy. Provided an option to Bissouma who runs with the ball rather than pass it.
 
The Dealer said:
Your ratings were selected by me as one of the 7 which had a semblance of credibility. I didn't agree with all of them but thought they were fair enough.
Actually my ratings are pretty close to yours except Vicario you gave a 9, me a 7, combined result was 7.72.
Skipp you gave a 4.5, me a 6, combined result was 5.44.
Hojbjerg you gave a 7, me a 9, combined average 7.27.

So disregarding Skipp as a sub and difficult to quantify. I was closer to the Vicario combined rating and you were closer on Hojbjerg.
So an even assessment on both parts......and yet you chose to disagree with mine and I selected yours as fair. !!
Click to expand...
I had Udogie as 7 and you had 6.5. That is absolutely unforgivable.

Its just a joke, mate. You gave out about 10 disagrees to the last ratings thread, so i thought I’d give you a little payback for a laugh. Plus I noticed our ratings were very similar which made it even more amusing.

You’ve calmed down a bit since this last thread, so I’ll take it easy on you. For now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom