Player Ratings: Liverpool (h) 2-1

[Mick Cooper]

Game of opinions and all that but 5.5 for van de ven wow

its a stupid figure to give him
but "it is what is mate!"

 

[zin]

Forum tables align you cunts!!	Selected 10	Media 10	Combined 20	Forum average
Vicario	7.00	7.40	7.20	7.86
Porro	8.10	7.85	7.97	8.32
Romero	7.65	7.40	7.52	7.61
VDV	7.50	6.75	7.12	7.86
Udogie	7.80	7.35	7.57	7.76

Sarr	6.75	6.85	6.80	6.88
Bissouma	7.85	7.80	7.82	7.65
Maddison	7.85	8.20	8.02	7.63
Kulusevski	6.65	6.65	6.65	6.99
Son	7.45	8.00	7.72	7.68
Richarlison	6.75	7.25	7.00	6.86

Just reposting what the The Dealer posted using forum tables so I can read it a bit easier. I'm personally only interested in the media 10 and forum average and conclude that the media are full of shit if they thought Maddison was MOTM when he's not even top five in the forum average!

Disagrees/agrees aside, I appreciate plenty of people couldn't give a fuck about the combined stats etc.., but he did ask if anyone wanted them , and I did say I would like to see them so fuck off

 

[paddy spur]

	Selected 10	Media 10	Combined 10	Forum average
Vicario	7.00	7.40	7.20	7.86
Porro	8.10	7.85	7.97	8.32
Romero	7.65	7.40	7.52	7.61
VDV	7.50	6.75	7.12	7.86
Udogie	7.80	7.35	7.57	7.76

Sarr	6.75	6.85	6.80	6.88
Bissouma	7.85	7.80	7.82	7.65
Maddison	7.85	8.20	8.02	7.63
Kulusevski	6.65	6.65	6.65	6.99
Son	7.45	8.00	7.72	7.68
Richarlison	6.75	7.25	7.00	6.86

Just reposting what the The Dealer posted using forum tables so I can read it a bit easier. I'm personally only interested in the media 10 and forum average and conclude that the media are full of shit if they thought Maddison was MOTM when he's not even top five in the forum average!

Disagrees/agrees aside, I appreciate plenty of people couldn't give a fuck about the combined stats etc.., but he did ask if anyone wanted them , and I did say I would like to see them so fuck off

 

[The Dealer]

Surely the point of this is to give a rating the individual thinks is merited and is their personal opinion.
You might not agree with some of the ratings, which is your prerogative, but do you really have to give out all those disagrees, surely you must realize this is inflammatory and just rubs people up the wrong way.
Anyway, I think the manager, coaching staff, all the players and supporters deserve 10/10 for this game.
Maybe you had to be there to appreciate how hard fought this game was.

I don't think players get a 10 rating just for fighting hard but you are entitled to your opinion. I don't agree with it, as I didn't some of the ratings. I did mark agree to some also.

 

[The Dealer]

Forum tables align you cunts!!	Selected 10	Media 10	Combined 10	Forum average
Vicario	7.00	7.40	7.20	7.86
Porro	8.10	7.85	7.97	8.32
Romero	7.65	7.40	7.52	7.61
VDV	7.50	6.75	7.12	7.86
Udogie	7.80	7.35	7.57	7.76

Sarr	6.75	6.85	6.80	6.88
Bissouma	7.85	7.80	7.82	7.65
Maddison	7.85	8.20	8.02	7.63
Kulusevski	6.65	6.65	6.65	6.99
Son	7.45	8.00	7.72	7.68
Richarlison	6.75	7.25	7.00	6.86

Just reposting what the The Dealer posted using forum tables so I can read it a bit easier. I'm personally only interested in the media 10 and forum average and conclude that the media are full of shit if they thought Maddison was MOTM when he's not even top five in the forum average!

Disagrees/agrees aside, I appreciate plenty of people couldn't give a fuck about the combined stats etc.., but he did ask if anyone wanted them , and I did say I would like to see them so fuck off

Thanks, it's a combined 20 in the third column, not 10.

 

[Shotgunofmichalebrow]

Why? Of course you can post about ratings/data relevant to this match in it's ratings thread.

Ironically, its these off-topic "I can't post anything in case I get foul votes" posts in here that are actually getting you foul votes.

Don't do it!! Don't get sucked in!!

 

[The Dealer]

Forum tables align you cunts!!	Selected 10	Media 10	Combined 10	Forum average
Vicario	7.00	7.40	7.20	7.86
Porro	8.10	7.85	7.97	8.32
Romero	7.65	7.40	7.52	7.61
VDV	7.50	6.75	7.12	7.86
Udogie	7.80	7.35	7.57	7.76

Sarr	6.75	6.85	6.80	6.88
Bissouma	7.85	7.80	7.82	7.65
Maddison	7.85	8.20	8.02	7.63
Kulusevski	6.65	6.65	6.65	6.99
Son	7.45	8.00	7.72	7.68
Richarlison	6.75	7.25	7.00	6.86

Just reposting what the The Dealer posted using forum tables so I can read it a bit easier. I'm personally only interested in the media 10 and forum average and conclude that the media are full of shit if they thought Maddison was MOTM when he's not even top five in the forum average!

Disagrees/agrees aside, I appreciate plenty of people couldn't give a fuck about the combined stats etc.., but he did ask if anyone wanted them , and I did say I would like to see them so fuck off

I rated Maddison highly for his contribution. I might be wrong and I have his mark sheet if anyone is interested.
Ratings are indeed personal opinions and methods of ratings will be different. I can only judge them against the average from other posters and sources.

 

[Airfixx]

Average player ratings v Liverpool using selected forum ratings to total 10 and 10 media/ web ratings. Then a combination of the 20 and finally a pure Forum comparison of all posted ratings at the time of analysis.
First column is forum, second media, third combination and last is the forum average in total.

This isn't true though is it.....? You've already said you don't count the ones you don't agree with..... And judging by the rating-spam you've been dishing out in this thread; that's a fair amount of 'em.

 

[The Dealer]

This isn't true though is it.....? You've already said you don't count the ones you don't agree with..... And judging by the rating-spam you've been dishing out in this thread; that's a fair amount of 'em.

Read it properly. The last column is the forum average in pure form. The first is 10 selected ratings.