Why don't you just call her Posto?
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
...which makes your 'forum ratings' 100% bogus and unreliable, making your presentations meaningless.
I'm not getting involved in this discussion again. I put up the comparisons for people to draw their own conclusions.
Because its not part of her name.
You doctor them to match your own opinions.
Give them both a 7
Careful now - he might not agree with that.
You don't even do ratings so why are you on this thread ?
It doesn't matter whether I agree or not. The ratings just have to be sensible and seemingly unbiased. Which can't be said for a fair proportion. ie 10s for every player etc.
The only meaningful element of the pure forum ratings results is just that. They don't incorporate neutral sources from outside or Spurs related ratings from elsewhere to give a broader result. It's is narrow and biased source of opinion.
My comparisons don't include ludicrous or joke ratings. It's websites , newspapers and podcasts. An alternative opinion.
The purpose of the comparison is to provide a different perspective.
I don't doctor them, I vet them only from this forum, as does admin ( so he says ) .
Can you grasp the fact that, by making a selection of ratings based on your value judgements, you're embedding your opinions into the result, creating a bias in the statistics and thereby invalidating any figures you come up with? Not that it matters anyway, because it doesn't.
Postecoglou: 9
Vicario: 7.5
Porro: 9
Romero: 7
Davies: 8
Udogie: 8
Skipp: 6
Højbjerg: 6
Sarr: 8
Bissouma: 7
Lo Celso: 6
Donley: 6
Son: 8.5
Richarlison: 8.5
Kulusevski: 7.5
Johnson: 7.5
Gil: 6
Submit your ratings | View match averages | View season averages
Vicario: 7.5
Porro: 9
Romero: 7
Davies: 8
Udogie: 8
Skipp: 6
Højbjerg: 6
Sarr: 8
Bissouma: 7
Lo Celso: 6
Donley: 6
Son: 8.5
Richarlison: 8.5
Kulusevski: 7.5
Johnson: 7.5
Gil: 6
Submit your ratings | View match averages | View season averages
No because I'm just omitting the rubbish which admin does anyway.
I don't select the media /Web ratings. They are what they are. By deselecting the stupid ratings , admin is doing the same as me, if not, the ratings are nonsense.
By using the word 'rubbish' you're confirming a bias. Bias and statistics are mutually incompatible. Your stats are therefore meaningless.
But who decides which ratings are 'stupid'? You do.
Did my ratings form part of your set?