Player Ratings: Nottingham Forest (a) 0-2

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Sort by date Sort by reaction score
KaneIsAble said:
Come On Reaction GIF by MOODMAN
Click to expand...

Obvious abuse of the ratings system and blatant spamming of an otherwise good thread. Skews the averages and renders it all pointless. It's very childish.

No wonder few take him seriously. ..... A poor man's Airfixx Airfixx
 
Last edited:
Snapshot of media/web ratings across 6 reports compared to pure forum ratings averages in second column.

Vicario....7.58, 8.08
Porro.......6.66, 7.25
Romero..7.16, 7.61
Davies....8......., 8.25
Udogie....6.33, 6.86
Sarr..........6.16, 6.50
Bissoum.3.16, 2.97
Kulusev..8.50, 9
Johnson 5.66, 5.22
Richi........7.33, 7.42
Son...........5.83, 6.56
Subs
Skipp.......5.66, 6.18
Hojbjerg 6......, 5.88
 
The Dealer said:
Snapshot of media/web ratings across 6 reports compared to pure forum ratings averages in second column.

Vicario....7.58, 8.08
Porro.......6.66, 7.25
Romero..7.16, 7.61
Davies....8......., 8.25
Udogie....6.33, 6.86
Sarr..........6.16, 6.50
Bissoum.3.16, 2.97
Kulusev..8.50, 9
Johnson 5.66, 5.22
Richi........7.33, 7.42
Son...........5.83, 6.56
Subs
Skipp.......5.66, 6.18
Hojbjerg 6......, 5.88
Click to expand...
That's a really interesting comparison to see. Thanks for posting.
The forum averages slightly higher but that's to be expected taking the natural bias in to account. But generally speaking, they're remarkably similar and follow the same pattern
 
Joan Thomas said:
That's a really interesting comparison to see. Thanks for posting.
The forum averages slightly higher but that's to be expected taking the natural bias in to account. But generally speaking, they're remarkably similar and follow the same pattern
Click to expand...
The bias is exactly the reason I introduce alternative ratings from outside. There is the pure forum rating and shall we say.....a broader spectrum including newspapers, Spurs websites and podcasts and neutral media etc.
A pattern is already emerging and it is there for everyone to see. I don't take much notice of any differential of up to 0.50 across 20 or more ratings but any higher , its potentially worthy of debate.
 
Joan Thomas said:
That's a really interesting comparison to see. Thanks for posting.
The forum averages slightly higher but that's to be expected taking the natural bias in to account. But generally speaking, they're remarkably similar and follow the same pattern
Click to expand...
The only debatable rating so far is Son, 5.83 to 6.56.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom