The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I think they can't trust him not to get into more sexual shenanigans if left on his own. The literally know he is sex pest and are protecting himThey literally sent a physio with him to Ghana. I think that speaks to their attitude toward him playing. They are desperate to maintain his fitness and availability. Unless he is charged, he will play. Mendy was named and still played up until charged. Goons will use that as precedent. They have lost three games this season, two of which are United and City and he didnt play in either of them. Absent injury or suspension, or being charged, he will start every game for them
Someone should ask Lego head about it in a press conference. Don’t even name Partey, just as what he thinks about players accused of multiple rapes playing and if he’d be happy to play one.
"Mikel, do you think that by constantly breaking the rules over staying in your technical area you are setting an example where certain players are unable to see the boundaries of what's acceptable in their personal lives?"
I think it's because the officials are a great big pile of shit who couldn't officiate at something that would be very easy to officiate at (can't think of anything other than a Sunday Mass).Why doesn’t the 4th official bring it to the ref’s attention who then gives him a yellow?
Then a red if he does it again
It would soon stop him and the likes of Klopp if they have to start watching games from the stands
I might be wrong but I'm pretty sure everyone was warned not to say his name. At least on other websites they said it's against rules and possibly UK laws to mention his name until found guilty.The rapist is THOMAS PARTEY.... right?
Why is everyone skirting round the issue??
Same as everyone turned a blind eye to Jimmy Savile back in the day....
I thought we were above all that now?
Apparently not....
He should invite his victims to attend the PL presentation trophy, where he gets his medal and gets to slap it in the face of the women he's RAPED....
now THAT would make good telly.... Sky would be ALL OVER that surely?
Are you referring to Thomas Partey? If so, I certainly won't mention his name. It would be very wrong.I might be wrong but I'm pretty sure everyone was warned not to say his name. At least on other websites they said it's against rules and possibly UK laws to mention his name until found guilty.
Are you referring to Thomas Partey? If so, I certainly won't mention his name. It would be very wrong.
Anyone want to join my 'DON'T SAY THOMAS PARTEY' campaign? I can see us now, marching past Parliament with our banners, chanting and singing 'DON'T SAY THOMAS PARTEY, THOMAS PARTEYYYY', with THOMAS PARTEY himself leading the protest, with tape over his mouth, confident that we will be under the safe protection of The Met Police.Nobody anywhere should be saying that Thomas PARTEY, footballer, is a triple rapist!
That would be bang out of order!
Well we can't know but lots of people here keep saying..Is Thomas Partey, the current Woolwich footballer, being referred as the alleged rapist?
Fair do'sI might be wrong but I'm pretty sure everyone was warned not to say his name. At least on other websites they said it's against rules and possibly UK laws to mention his name until found guilty.
Well done for deleting his name. In fact, I'm in favour of making it illegal to mention ANYONE by name, in any scenario, until they have been convicted and imprisoned.
I'm not saying I agree with it. I was just answering his question about why nobody is saying his name. I think there is enough evidence for everyone to know who is being talked about and we should be able to say it.Well done for deleting his name. In fact, I'm in favour of making it illegal to mention ANYONE by name, in any scenario, until they have been convicted and imprisoned.
Why make it easy for people to make an accusation of rape? I'm sure Harvey Weinstein would have approved.
Who was it again?......Anyone want to join my 'DON'T SAY THOMAS PARTEY' campaign? I can see us now, marching past Parliament with our banners, chanting and singing 'DON'T SAY THOMAS PARTEY, THOMAS PARTEYYYY', with THOMAS PARTEY himself leading the protest, with tape over his mouth, confident that we will be under the safe protection of The Met Police.
As far as I know, THOMAS PARTEY hasn't been charged with any criminal offence, let alone the sexual assault of three women, so his name must not be bandied around like some people are. Reprehensible behaviour (I'm referring to people naming THOMAS PARTEY, not the sexual assault of three women, that THOMAS PARTEY hasn't even been charged with, let alone tried for, or convicted of). Whatever happened to 'innocent until proven guilty'? I thought we Brits were proud of not pre-judging someone and I'm sure THOMAS PARTEY hopes that too, just as a general citizen, not for any disgusting, evil thing he may or may not have done.
Has THOMAS PARTEY been arrested? No.
Has THOMAS PARTEY been charged with any crime? No.
Has THOMAS PARTEY commented on these internet allegations? No idea.
Should THOMAS PARTEY be a name nobody can mention? Absolutely - nobody should be allowed to type the letters T H O M A S _ P A R T E Y in that order. Ever. Never. Gooners who chant his name should be arrested.
I do hope THOMAS PARTEY appreciates my support.