• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer 2019 transfer thread

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports


Not sure how much truth there is to this but it basically says that Poch has telephoned Lo Celso to explain that £40m is all we can offer right now, until we sell players, possibly Eriksen.

Poch apparently also said to Celso that Spurs ‘don’t have much money to go to market’ but that will change if Eriksen gets sold.

Probably just bullshit but thought I would share anyway.

LoL. Absolute shite

We budget for europa league qtr final or whatever and got to champions league final. Theres about 80m right off the bat. Plus the money we didnt spend last year. Plus the extra season ticket revenue from the new stadium.

We have about 120m to 150m BEFORE player sales.
 
LoL. Absolute shite

We budget for europa league qtr final or whatever and got to champions league final. Theres about 80m right off the bat. Plus the money we didnt spend last year. Plus the extra season ticket revenue from the new stadium.

We have about 120m to 150m BEFORE player sales.
Mate if we were to spend what we should technically have available we'd probably be pushing half a billion. It's what Levy and ENIC are willing to release as transfer funds that really matters.
 
How many of these do you think were positive signings?

1. Davinson Sanchez (£40million)
2. Moussa Sissoko (£35million)
3. Roberto Soldado (£30million)
4. Erik Lamela (£30million)
5. Heung-Min Son (£30million
6. Lucas Moura (£28.4million)
7. Serge Aurier (£25million)
8. Darren Bent (£24.7million)
9. Vincent Janssen (£22.1million)
10. David Bentley (£22million)

half of those £ are bollocks.
 
I like our team - I think it could have won trophies, I think the manager and the chairman are working together to better the team to win trophies. I trust that they are going for the best players they can and still invest in infrastructure that will allow us to increase revenue and match others spending and wages in the long term (its wage spend that's the real metric not transfer spend).

If you look at this thread most are saying they want Ndombele, most are happy to discuss pros and cons of a player - some are just shouting at the moon to get the deal done whatever the cost over and over and causing the conversation to go on a tangent.

The stewardship of the club has been good, I am confident that their aims are in line with mine and they are doing all they can to grow and win trophies.

Do you think this team has been good enough to win things in the past 3 years - I do.
Because they know that's what our manager wants.

Clearly the manager and chairman seem at odds if you go by our recent transfer activity and what Poch says in the media about us having to change our approach and start a new project, he even refers to the fact that we haven't signed a player in 18 months.

But let's say for arguments sake, that they do have the same vision going forwards and they are working together in perfect harmony and have been this entire time.

let's say that ENIC and Levy are determined to win this club a trophy and their goals are in line with the supporters and they are doing that playing the long game (even if the "doing it the right way" long game is incredibly unrealistic in a day and age when someone could buy a club like Aston Villa and turn them into a modern Man City overnight.)

But let's just say, like I said, for arguments sake, everything you are saying is true and realistic, let me ask you this question then, you say we have been good enough to win trophies over the last 3 years and yet, here we are, without a trophy, my question to you is, who is to blame?

The manager? If this squad has been good enough, as you say, then surely he should get fired should he not? I mean, he's been at the club for over half a decade now and if you think this team has been good enough to win a trophy then who is to blame?

OR could it be, that this team HASN'T been good enough to win a trophy and that we are on the cusp of doing that but have fallen just short every single time because our chairman has not invested in the squad and strengthend it so we have fallen short and our manager is working this team to its maximum level of potential (or beyond imo) as things currently stand?

Which one do you think is more likely to be true?

I mean, I am still seeing some of our supporters saying we have a better team than Liverpool, a club that has now got to a CL final twice in a row and finished 20+ points ahead of us in the league, what level of delusion is that? That's our competition for a trophy btw, both them and Man City, so tell me, how are we going to make up that gap playing the long game when they can just continue to spend money?
 
Last edited:
LoL. Absolute shite

We budget for europa league qtr final or whatever and got to champions league final. Theres about 80m right off the bat. Plus the money we didnt spend last year. Plus the extra season ticket revenue from the new stadium.

We have about 120m to 150m BEFORE player sales.

If that is indeed the case then we should fully expect to see that reinvested in the squad to strengthen it so we can challenge City and Liverpool for a trophy, anything less than that is an abject failure on the part of our owners and shows that their ambitions and intentions are not the same as our managers or our supporters surely?
 
I could have sworn it was Barnby...Sugar definitely walked into a training session, pointed at a player and asked his name, then said well I'm going to sell him. Was a story my old man used to tell me whenever Sugar came on TV. Should have paid more attention


He supposedly said to Robbie Keane in a meeting "I'm not paying you that, I've never heard of you."

We obviously then signed him a few years later, but only after Enic had taken over.
 
How many of these do you think were positive signings?

1. Davinson Sanchez (£40million)
2. Moussa Sissoko (£35million)
3. Roberto Soldado (£30million)
4. Erik Lamela (£30million)
5. Heung-Min Son (£30million
6. Lucas Moura (£28.4million)
7. Serge Aurier (£25million)
8. Darren Bent (£24.7million)
9. Vincent Janssen (£22.1million)
10. David Bentley (£22million)

Whoever wrote that article is a clueless cunt. Bent 24.7 million? Janssen and Bentley 22 million each??? :levylol:

7 of those fees are absolute cobblers. The only correct ones are Sánchez, Lamela and Soldado.
 
Hopefully this helps clear a path to Ndombele even further, kind of shocked City ain’t in for him after he played them off the park in the CL games.
Weirdly enough I don't think he'd fit into their midfield very well. He's probably too attack minded to play the Fernandinho role but he's also possibly not silky enough to play the Silva/KDB/Foden etc role either. It's a strange one.
 
I am making my assessment of our transfer operations based on the only factual evidence I have available, I am not going to base what we might do on optimism alone, that's ridiculous.

I haven't misrepresented anything either, I said some people care more about how much we are spending on players than they do about signing them, that much is pretty damn evident from anyone who has read the last 20 pages of this thread.

It's also true, that someone like myself, couldn't give a toss what we spend on a player as long as we get the players our manager wants, that doesn't mean I think we should spend £500m every window either, it just means I think we should get our manager the targets he wants.
No, you are right. If poch wanted to spend 200m & did, clearly some would be worried about that from a business aspect. Not sure why rusx keeps protesting about this despite all the posts where people are against us spending big.
 
But let's just say, like I said, for arguments sake, everything you are saying is true and realistic, let me ask you this question then, you say we have been good enough to win trophies over the last 3 years and yet, here we are, without a trophy, my question to you is, who is to blame?
no one - at any point 4 or 5 teams are good enough to win trophies, not everything needs to have blame attached.

let's say that ENIC and Levy are determined to win this club a trophy and their goals are in line with the supporters and they are doing that playing the long game (even if the "doing it the right way" long game is incredibly unrealistic in a day and age when someone could buy a club like Aston Villa and turn them into a modern Man City overnight.)

Villa is a great example - they went balls deep supporting a manager and are still paying for it now.

I want us to spend like the richer clubs, I am sure you have seen this

I know its business but its the reason in black and white - as that gets closer we will spend like them and its getting closer and closer every year.
 
soldado was £26m, and actually i think a load of that was add ons that weren't achieved.
825540.gif


Will always love Bobby :pochcry:
 
No, you are right. If poch wanted to spend 200m & did, clearly some would be worried about that from a business aspect. Not sure why rusx keeps protesting about this despite all the posts where people are against us spending big.
Scott - not sure if you understand but I will write it simply for you as you seem to be willfully ignoring my posts.

If the club decide to spend 200M I (and others) will be over the moon as they know what we have to spend, if they don't spend 200M I will not be calling for their heads as they know what they have to spend. This is the common theme, people are talking based on what they think the situation, you on we have that money others on we don't have that money.

There may be some that do not want us to spend the money because its wrong (I must have missed them) but all the posts I have seen have been in response to demands to pay whatever it takes and advising we don't have the same funds available as our competitors.
 
Back
Top