When I said improvement I was speaking about improving the positions that were our biggest issue last season, IE right wing back and centre back. Have we improved either of those positions? No.
Richarlison improves our depth up front sure. But not our starting 11.
When I spoke about being cautious, it has been a cautious window to a large degree if you go through every signing.
Forster - free, old, home grown, chose him over a younger long term successor to Lloris. Very safe low risk signing.
Perisic - free, hopefully will improve the team but if he doesn’t and can’t adjust to the PL what harm, he was free. Will probably get 1 maybe 2 seasons max out of him.
Bissouma - solid pl midfielder. cheap. Upgrade on Winks. Extremely low risk transfer.
Richarlison - solid premier league player with a steady goals return in the league. Will provide good back up and rotation. Considering the money we spent we possibly could have got a better player but went with the safe premier league option.
Lenglet - loan, if he’s shit we tell him sod off, if he’s decent we keep him for cheap. Doesn’t really improve the team. Virtually zero risk transfer.
Spence - cheap championship punt. If he’s good he’s the next Deli brilliant. If he’s shite and the next Jack Clarke so be it, we flog him off again. Doesn’t improve the starting 11. Zero risk player.
You offer a lot of opinions as if they're dyed in the wool facts. They're not.
It remains to be seen if Lenglet is an improvement.
It remains to be seen if Perisic is an improvement.
It remains to be seen if Spence is an improvement.
It remains to be seen if Bissouma is an improvement.
Repeat ad nauseum.
The only "fact" where new signings are concerned, is that you cannot guage whether they are an improvement or not until after the fact.
I get the impression that you only see players as improvements if you rate them. That's not even a reasoned opinion, it's just personal bias.
It was only January that we had people on here, I don't know if you were one of them, that were bewailing us getting Juve "rejects" as they weren't an "improvement" on what we already had. Turns out they were wrong. So before you start throwing around claims that the players we have don't meet your personal criteria of "improvement," how about you keep your powder dry and let these players you are denigrating prove whether they are an improvement or not. For that matter, how about you do the same for existing players who have visibly "improved" under Conte's tutelage.
By all means discuss possibilities, but how about you refrain from making suppositions and trying to pass them off as cast iron certainties?
After all, you can look at a variety of players in the league who weren't established names, but came into their respective teams and "improved" them. Just as a sample I'll give you Robertson and TAA at Liverpool, Bowen at West Ham, James at Chelsea...
The list goes on...