Sounds like Mr. Levy is getting excited, he just received his Tesco clubcard vouchers in the post
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Sounds like Mr. Levy is getting excited, he just received his Tesco clubcard vouchers in the post
If we get anyone else in the next week or so, it feels more and more like it will be Johnson.
View: https://twitter.com/MailSport/status/1694373198970675692?t=em_lArksYgW2RWNmaqvRyg&s=19
Honestly, this guy for 70, Johnson for 50, these are just nutty figures when you see wham getting a talent like Kudus for 40m.It will be worse bussiness than signing Richarlison for 60, this guy is just an average player.
Yea that is what I heard as well. Why don’t we just get a CF? Or get gift who would a lot less risk and price.I hope I'm wrong but this guy just doesn't seem like a solution to our problem. We need a proper winger who can control the ball, dribble 1v1 and most importantly score against a low block.
He seems to be a counter attacker with very poor finishing ability.
Sounds like Ange is very keen. A more versatile player and PL experienced. Plus of course helps our HG quota.Really have to question this one. Orban is approx €30M half the price. Johnson’s goals and assist are not that great.
View: https://x.com/thespurswatch/status/1694795943961362883?s=46&t=DK3x3JffKkqwqcsQdIeO_A
After Raya this summer and Toneys comments about woolwich, I’d be gutted if we ever bought anyone from that cunty little 2 bob club
Just think that would be £110M on rich and Johnson and not a 20 goal or assist a season player between them! We waste so much money on crap. City are buying doku for roughly sane price as Johnson. Is diaby just as good? Just bloody get eze if we are splunking on Johnson.Each to their own but I don't like to blindly defer to the opinions of anyone, not even Pep.
![]()
Tottenham tipped to land deadly £55m striker who'll gladly join Ange Postecoglou
Lille centre-forward Jonathan David is reportedly 'keen' on joining Tottenham this summer, as Ange Postecoglou searches for a Harry Kane replacement.www.teamtalk.com
Tottenham reconsider Paratici striker target
According to transfer journalist Ben Jacobs, David ‘cannot be ruled out’ as Tottenham’s next striker signing. But, he could be an expensive addition.
“Jonathan David remains a really interesting one. If we are talking about fees, that’s a very high fee, somewhere in the region of 60 to 65 million Euros (£50-55m) but it could come down because David is keen on the move,” Jacobs told Last Word on Spurs.
“This is an interesting one because the only name if Kane left under Paratici that Tottenham were really seriously exploring when they first got wind, probably around March or April, that the Kane situation might be changing against them.”
“The only name that they put forward to begin with was Jonathan David, but that was under Paratici and under Conte or interims, now again Postecoglou is going to have his say.
“I know some other Premier League clubs have looked at Jonathan David and they are not so sure about whether or not he’ll be a fit for Premier League football.
“The stats suggest he will but the reality is can he do it at a different pace and level? That’s what I’m most intrigued to see but I certainly wouldn’t rule out David.”
https://www.givemesport.com/tottenh...ransfer-update-on-51m-striker-at-hotspur-way/
What did Fabrizio Romano say about Tottenham Hotspur and Jonathan David?
Romano insisted that Spurs have been keeping tabs on the 23-year-old for a while now, though his transfer could fail to materialise due to Lille's lofty asking price.
The transfer expert claims that a fee in the region of €60m (£51m) would be enough to snare his services this summer, while a potential deal may also hinge on whether his current employers can find a worthy successor in time.
Speaking exclusively to GIVEMESPORT, he said: “Jonathan David is a player they’ve been tracking for a long time, but it’s a complicated one because of the price. I’m hearing that Lille want something around €60m. They started from €65m but that now could be around €60m to sell Jonathan David, but also, they would need a replacement. So, in this case, timing is crucial, and it’s not going to be an easy one.”
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm1tpFbzOWc
Brentford is a total wanker of a football club.
Diaby is much better than Johnson.Just think that would be £110M on rich and Johnson and not a 20 goal or assist a season player between them! We waste so much money on crap. City are buying doku for roughly sane price as Johnson. Is diaby just as good? Just bloody get eze if we are splunking on Johnson.
Exactly why arnt we in fir kudus?Honestly, this guy for 70, Johnson for 50, these are just nutty figures when you see wham getting a talent like Kudus for 40m.
There has to be talent out there they can scout without getting ripped off.
Keep Alfie then or promote dorrington?Sounds like Ange is very keen. A more versatile player and PL experienced. Plus of course helps our HG quota.
But we’re t interested yet we now want to so end £50M on this guy. Gonna check him out on you tube.
Whatever your thoughts are on Johnson, he's at least ready to play now and can legitimately put pressure on Kulu's starting spot.
Ffs might as well bring back Clarke.I admittedly haven’t watched a ton of forest games, but whenever I’ve seen Johnson, he hasn’t really been impressive.
He’s basically just young and fast and a lot of people think that means he’s a great prospect. But Dan James was also young and first… and many others like him.
I would not be too excited about this.
We should’ve never played him vs Barca he got fucking demolished by that 16 year old and all the interest immediately dried upFuck off now Reguilon will stay too. This window is turning into a bloody nightmare!
Porro's release clause was 45M Euro, which as release clauses are would have been required to be paid up-front. Sporting also owed Man City a 30% sell-on, so they would only have gotten 31.5M of that 45M.IIRC correctly I think we did pay more , it was a total clusterfuck negotiation , or we passed the release clause deadline and had to pay much more than originally upfront .
if I wasn’t so lazy I would try and find it , happy to be proved wrong if I’m talking bollocks . I just seem to remember it going horribly wrong
Don’t see anyone else after him?This is true actually, spending £50m on Johnson would be much better than the rumored fee climbing up into the £35m range for Orban. I have really soured on Orban as I’ve watched two of his recent games in full. What purpose does a 5’9” CF who has never won a header in his life and isn’t at all involved in build-up have in the Premier League?
Johnson’s profile is excellent, really - well sized, right sided wing forward who can play across the 3, excellent pace and burst, exuberant runs in behind, proven goal-assist record in England, only 22 - and importantly, homegrown.
![]()
Brennan Johnson’s role at Nottingham Forest: A ball-carrier in need of support
With exclusive insight from his managers past and present, we look at the stats that show why Brennan Johnson is key to Nottingham Forest’s prospects. He tops two Premier League metrics – one is a reason for excitement, the other is a cause for concern…www.skysports.com
His performance is not. He doesn’t have the required technical capability, the top footballing brain and instincts, the vision and creativity to play in tight spaces, nor is he really a top dribbler who can beat players with skill, he just sort of runs into space.
The problem is, why exactly are Forest only pricing him at £50m if he’s so important to them, and why exactly does he never really seem to impress in small spaces?