• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
Greenwood I’ve seen the pictures of the girl.

She dropped the case because “she loves him”…

If this is like that, then obviously not.

Is it like that?

Dropped because of 👇👇👇 ......... we all heard the recordings and the saw the bruises
1*lkEGJ6G_D6TLfLQFkn4nqg.gif
 
Obviously we won’t but this sort of thing happens in North American sports all the time. Google Tyreek Hill

Not to dredge up old 'arguments' but you were deeply concerned by the optics of the Solomon deal t'other day....... And I assume you saw how quickly the media rounded on us over the potential CSKA deal for Dav......

.......This is a potentially far more grave scenario than both.
 
Not to dredge up old 'arguments' but you were deeply concerned by the optics of the Solomon deal t'other day....... And I assume you saw how quickly the media rounded on us over the potential CSKA deal for Dav......

.......This is a potentially far more grave scenario than both.
This is true, but ultimately 2/3s of the executive branch of the club are criminals too, so…

we employ a DoF who is banned from the game of football and have a criminal owner who’s going to court for multiple counts of insider trading and corporate theft. What’s one more criminal to our jailbus?

If we’re not going to exercise restraint when hiring directors of football who are literal convicted criminals then why should we start doing it for our footballers?
 


"Daniel didn't want to pay the money"...

Arry talking about missing out on Eden Hazard.


Always has been the difference.

Commitment.


VEEEEEERY different to what was reported from all sides at the time...... Harry can be very self-serving with his recollection of yore.

At the time it was reported that Hazard had agreed terms with both us & Chavs and decided to go to whoever got CL..... We got 4th, but their CL win screwed us out of a CL spot.

......He neglects to mention that if HE hadn't taken his eye off the ball over the England job and tax evasion court case then we might have got 3rd or better that year and the saga could have played out differently.....

[sarcasm font] but why would good ol' Harry leave any of that out? [/sarcasm font]

.......Notice he didn't mention turning down the opportunity to sign Suarez back when he was still at Ajax either whilst on the subject of 'the ones that got away'?
 
Last edited:


"Daniel didn't want to pay the money"...

Arry talking about missing out on Eden Hazard.


Always has been the difference.

Commitment.

Nah, that definitely wasn’t the money. It was the fact that we missed CL despite finishing 4th.

I can literally pinpoint the exact moment as the 101st minute of that cursed 2012 CL final.

All Robben had to do was bury that peno in extra time but he couldn’t and they bottled it to Roberto Di Matteo’s fighting Chavs.

The deal was all done with Lille, ITKs confirmed it, but when Chelsea won CL they got a cash injection and CL football so he picked them over us. It makes my blood boil to this day. One penalty from Robben and our entire club fortune might have changed.
 
This is true, but ultimately 2/3s of the executive branch of the club are criminals too, so…

we employ a DoF who is banned from the game of football and have a criminal owner who’s going to court for multiple counts of insider trading and corporate theft. What’s one more criminal to our jailbus?

If we’re not going to exercise restraint when hiring directors of football who are literal convicted criminals then why should we start doing it for our footballers?

Fact check:

Paraticci: Isn't a "convicted criminal". None of that shit has even entered a criminal trial......
Lewis: Billionaire accused of shady dealings..... No "criminal conviction" to speak of as yet either.

Regardless; which one of these scenarios do you genuinely think out-sleazes woman-beating and pedo-wank scandals?
 
Last edited:
I've mentioned him a few times in various threads. Kid's got some good qualities, athletic, strong, pretty quick, technically decent, can use both feet, is a decent finisher, banged in a fair few goals this season. I think he'd fit the Ange system.
Ange wants to build a positive culture, teammates supporting each other, more experienced players encouraging younger ones.

If the allegations are true, Wahi doesn't look like he'd be an, ahem, positive influence....

-------------------------------

In October 2021, a 22-year old woman filed a legal complaint against Wahi for violence that resulted in her being incapable to work. She claimed that he had punched her in the nose during an evening out at the L'Entrepôt nightclub in Lattes, Hérault, on the night of 12–13 September a month earlier. [13]

In November 2021, it was revealed by investigative reporter Romain Molina that Wahi had been expelled from Caen's youth academy for allegedly pressuring secondary school students to masturbate in front of him in the bathrooms

Elye Wahi - Wikipedia
 
Back
Top