Hope Frank sits in on the negotiations with Bayern. He could be useful.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Levy should be feeling shame looking at families finding £80 a pop for their kids to buy a ticket when he hasn’t even feigned an attempt to keep up.
Agree and disagree, we need to streamline, but that comes in phases.We took 31 players on our preseason tour and that was with about 5 first teamers left at home injured. We absolutely do have to sell before we buy, that is the sad consequence of our abysmal transfer business in the last 5 years. Even Chelsea, with all their money, had to flog countless players before they could start buying this summer.
I put an agree on this because it’s a great point well made.Firstly, no one is 'bigging up' Woolwich when we complain that their transfer expenditure is more than ours.
Secondly, the way you use statistics is flawed.
I've seen your posts on this- you take a fixed time point (when we moved into new stadium) and then compare net spend since then.
But the fact that our net spend was far lower than theirs before this point distorts the statistic. This is because they can sell the product of their previous high spend to fund players for a lower 'net spend' but same value.
Simplified hypothetical to demonstrate my point:
2020-2023:
Club A spend £100m on strikers, 0 sales,
Club B spend £30m on strikers, 0 sales.
2024-2026:
Club A sell the previously bought strikers for £50m, and spend another £100m on strikers.
Club B sell the previously bought strikers for £15m, and spend another £65m on strikers.
The 2024-2026 net spend on strikers for both clubs are identical. But Club A's strikers between 2024-2026 are of higher value.
Of course the usual caveats apply... monetary value may not = performance etc. But if we are discussing expenditure, this point is very relevant.
Depending on the game; kids are as little as £15, mate..... Even £70 adult seats for Cat A games are only £35 for juniors & OAPs.
It’s self interest.
Don't see why any other club wouldn't just wait until Friday too...
think barca might late swoop him, ter stegen getting on a bit and suits their systemHe's worth 40m if anyone wants to pay that.
They clearly don't.
Woolwich might be dumb enough.
Glad we didn't go for Tosin, he was for sale and not a single Premier League team showed any serious interest. We should have brought in at least one centre back by now, but not that one.
With what money, they are beyond broke.think barca might late swoop him, ter stegen getting on a bit and suits their system
Agree and disagree, we need to streamline, but that comes in phases.
In that we need to buy early, because we aspire to the higher calibre players potentially avaialable.
Yet, in waiting until we unload, we are placing ourselves at the end of the market. When we could buy, and take the potential hit on a few we may get lowballed because clubs see we already have replacements.
It‘s Football Fan Stockholm Syndrome, to not be utterly perplexed by Levy/ENIC right now.
sales of kessie and few others, got rid of busquets and alba's wages
Agree and disagree, we need to streamline, but that comes in phases.
In that we need to buy early, because we aspire to the higher calibre players potentially avaialable.
Yet, in waiting until we unload, we are placing ourselves at the end of the market. When we could buy, and take the potential hit on a few we may get lowballed because clubs see we already have replacements.
It‘s Football Fan Stockholm Syndrome, to not be utterly perplexed by Levy/ENIC right now.
think barca might late swoop him, ter stegen getting on a bit and suits their system