The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
To be fair, I wonder if that's partly because the anti-levy posters are more inclined to promote their agenda in threads where it has little relevance, resulting in foul votes for going off-topic. Of course the same won't apply to people who are not anti-Levy, not because they are better people etc or anything like that, but simply because they generally have no agenda to raise, i.e. they are not as upset with the current management so don't need to bring it into all discussions.
NOTE: To repeat / be clear, I'm not saying one side is any 'worse' than the other, I'm just providing a plausible reason why posters on one side of the debate are legitimately more likely to get foul-voted than others. Of course there will still be foul votes for abuse etc on both sides, but off-topic may account for a good proportion of them I expect.![]()
Your posts always read like you've Googled what you want to say.Some were.
Baldini signed the magnificent 7 but Comolli did some good work too like Arnesen before him.
Levy sacks them all but he seems to prefer the ones who make the big sales.
Baldini wanted to give Kane to Leicester after he helped Levy to sell Bale.
Bmuff will be decent this year. Brentford more likely to be in trouble imo.
Not exactly to Ange younger approach. Probably his agent throwing his name around.
Veliiz travelling over night, and probably about 10 hours or so flying time so I guess medical on Monday ? Maybe see game on Sunday
Your posts always read like you've Googled what you want to say.
A few of the SC ITKs (pinch of salt, yeah, yeah) talking about Antonio Silva being a target. Absolute monster of a CB. Wonder if we were to get someone like him Romero could play the inverted FB role and step into midfield for some matches.
We're ranked as one of the most valuable clubs in world football!Royal to get converted into a CB ? That's the only effective way to use porro, Spence, udogie and sess on a rotation basis as WBs
He’s got Madrid or City or United written all over him tbh. I would be shocked if we got him, top prospect, has a big release clause and a long contract. Benfica are probably holding out for a big fee next summer
We're ranked as one of the most valuable clubs in world football!
Should we concern ourselves with desperately converting half decent fullbacks to CB's??
I'm one that don't think our defensive woe's of lately is 100% down to our awful CB's. YES they are the biggest problem, but i think a lot is also down to our fullbacks and DMC's.
Dodgy source but reports are either €90 or 100m, he’s just signed a new deal this year
As per usual we are leaving things very late in the window yet again. Kane obviously looks gone now, it's a question whether we re-invest well or not. Like to see another CH after VDV signs, a pacy forward who can play across the front three and at least another midfielder if PEH leaves. All need to be first team players, not ones gor the future.
Bit concerned about our full backs too, Udogie might work who knows, presume Royal is first choice right back, but Porro looks like an all out wing back and Davies and Sess def not good enough, fast enough or reliable enough to be regular starters, looks a bit light after our recent investment in wing backs, again lack of forward planning clearly evident.
Gift Orban stats and ratings | Sofascore
Gift Orban profile player page. Goals, matches, stats, player ratings and more.www.sofascore.com
Gift Orban was on the bench for Gent's game 2 days ago. Really makes you think.
Dodgy source but reports are either €90 or 100m, he’s just signed a new deal this year
It seems like a really soft foul vote, people on all sides of the debate go off topic and have posts that can be classed as spam and off topic all the time, even your post and my current post is off topic.To be fair, I wonder if that's partly because the anti-levy posters are more inclined to promote their agenda in threads where it has little relevance, resulting in foul votes for going off-topic. Of course the same won't apply to people who are not anti-Levy, not because they are better people etc or anything like that, but simply because they generally have no agenda to raise, i.e. they are not as upset with the current management so don't need to bring it into all discussions.
NOTE: To repeat / be clear, I'm not saying one side is any 'worse' than the other, I'm just providing a plausible reason why posters on one side of the debate are legitimately more likely to get foul-voted than others. Of course there will still be foul votes for abuse etc on both sides, but off-topic may account for a good proportion of them I expect.![]()