Means he’s seen the marketing material I reckon
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)
- Thread starter Fattynomates
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Means he’s seen the marketing material I reckon
You still don't think the best striker in the world is worth more than a defensive midfielder from West Ham?
Spence + Rodon + bit of cash for ole Brenners?
My whole thing is we need to shift the deadwood. If Forest actually want Spence then there’s a deal to be done. I don’t really care where they go just need them off the books.
Yes you do when you include stadium revenue for home games alongside TV and CL from UEFA
Don’t really buy the link tbh.
My guess is that Forest want to get bidders to come in
Another reason I'd sell. The idea of a player with a history of lower leg and ankle injuries switching to a boot producer with limited history in the sport?
As a longtime basketball fan, many athletes have had careers shortened or greatly impacted by inferior equipment.
I think don't that comes into it.... We already showed we could do that vs City 2 years ago.
We also didn't budge when the rest of the world was trying to sell Poch's team (and Poch) himself every trf window.
As has been said before; EPL teams can afford to say "no" these days if they want to.
Risk is everywhere.... Ndombele was a risk......... Meanwhile Richarlison wasn't percieved to be particularly risky 12 months ago (hence we paid a high evaluation)............ Players (in this context; assets) risk career ending injury every time they put their boots on.
Last edited:
apparently he gained weight over the summer. Few Forest fans have said that.
Sketchers are comfy as. He's gonna be gliding all over the pitch this season!
I'd suggest you might be underestimating CL money as the extra matches gives us both ticket money plus food and drink (and even food and drink will be £1m+ per match).
Additionally a number of sponsors give extra money for CL appearances - but I'm not sure anyone has the knowledge outside Spurs to estimate what that is.
Plus we might pick up additional sponsor/commercial income that we wouldn't otherwise get.
The TV is part of the CL payment and is dependent upon the club's UEFA coefficient (ours will be shit in 24/25 because the CL final year has rolled off).
We'll definitely make money on the CL I we qualified, but it'll be closer to the £50-60M range including matchday receipts (net from each match after factoring in costs isn't as high as you think).
Especially so because we'd be replacing Kane not with £100M fee, but with whatever transfer funds ENIC provide (which we already know won't be £100M). We'll not be getting beyond the group stage, in all likelihood.
Another Charlie Kane masterclass...
Comfort ≠ sport performance. Going to comfortably shatter that ankle.
stolen from sc...
From Prof on COYS about 15 minutes before the bid being rejected hitting the news. The shorter contract is what I reckon will happen and suggested it a few weeks ago as the best move for everyone.
A mixture of info from Gawain and a new source.
We have put two contract options in front of Harry and his reps.
A long term incentive laden contract to remove the uncertainty for us and for him. Barring significant injury he’d break Shearer’s record and pretty much retire as a Spurs player.
A mid-range contract with buyout clause that would put us in a similar position next summer as we are this summer. This option would give us at least another year of Harry, and give him time to decide whether he’s buying in to our future under Ange, as well as setting a minimum sale price.
No idea if he’ll negotiate a bit and then sign one of them, sign neither and leave on a free next summer, or be sold before this window closes. DL wants a decision asap so Spurs know how much they’ll have to spend and which positions they’ll need to focus on for the remainder of the window.
This week provides much for both HK and DL to ponder.
From Prof on COYS about 15 minutes before the bid being rejected hitting the news. The shorter contract is what I reckon will happen and suggested it a few weeks ago as the best move for everyone.
A mixture of info from Gawain and a new source.
We have put two contract options in front of Harry and his reps.
A long term incentive laden contract to remove the uncertainty for us and for him. Barring significant injury he’d break Shearer’s record and pretty much retire as a Spurs player.
A mid-range contract with buyout clause that would put us in a similar position next summer as we are this summer. This option would give us at least another year of Harry, and give him time to decide whether he’s buying in to our future under Ange, as well as setting a minimum sale price.
No idea if he’ll negotiate a bit and then sign one of them, sign neither and leave on a free next summer, or be sold before this window closes. DL wants a decision asap so Spurs know how much they’ll have to spend and which positions they’ll need to focus on for the remainder of the window.
This week provides much for both HK and DL to ponder.
hmmmm
I don't think Johnson is that good and think we can get better but what exactly has Gil done with us? the guy puts in 1 decent cross and some go on like he's the second coming of Messi.
Johnson productivity wise is on another planet. He has unbelievable pace and his finishing is Insanely good.
I would prefer a player with better dribbling and someone that can carry the ball rather then run into spaces to be targeted but comparing Johnson to Gil is laughable.
He could also get injured and not play for half the season........
Bold statement from him, especially when VdV was at the stadium last night
