• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer thread - 2024

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

How Dry should our Powder be?

  • Total voters
    58
Richard Arlison said:
Veeeery different.

Gyokeres more like Kane and wants to be a target man but also drop into pockets.

Openda is like a Suarez or Aguero type. Making runs, finishing, harassing defenders.

Openda also great in the air and is a strong fucker even if he's 5'10. Would be knocking defenders off balance and making runs between CBs.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Much more suitable for Ange, so.
 
Shadydan said:
It's a bit strange our fans still hanging onto this narrative as if Gallagher is some scrub with no tekkers when we saw what he did to our midfield with a supposed higher technical level a couple of weeks ago, we couldn't get near him, more to the point some of our players have gone missing in these past few weeks but Gallagher has always shown himself for them even when they weren't playing well.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

“Couldn’t get near him” What a load of bollocks. He was barely in the game and hardly saw any of the ball. He only completed 22 passes all game, Bissouma did more than double that in 60min. Sarr and Bentancur the same in 30 minutes. Our midfield dominated the ball that game (63 possession) it was our forwards that were shite. He was a busy little fucker as usual, without the ball, but let’s keep it real.

I don’t hate the idea of Gallagher as much as some, in as much as we could replace Hojbjerg, Bentancur and Skipp’s skill set with one HG player - as long as that’s what we do and clear out that dead wood.

He could be a Rice/Henderson type of up and downer who chips in with a handful of goals/assists whilst also being a defensive busy cunt with a good engine and decent mobility.
 
bus-conductor said:
“Couldn’t get near him” What a load of bollocks. He was barely in the game and hardly saw any of the ball. He only completed 22 passes all game, Bissouma did more than double that in 60min. Sarr and Bentancur the same in 30 minutes. Our midfield dominated the ball that game (63 possession) it was our forwards that were shite. He was a busy little fucker as usual, without the ball, but let’s keep it real.

I don’t hate the idea of Gallagher as much as some, in as much as we could replace Hojbjerg, Bentancur and Skipp’s skill set with one HG player - as long as that’s what we do and clear out that dead wood.

He could be a Rice/Henderson type of up and downer who chips in with a handful of goals/assists whilst also being a defensive busy cunt with a good engine and decent mobility.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Bentancur isn’t deadwood and we’ll be rightly keeping him.

Other than that, I agree.
 
Klaus said:
Gray is three years younger than Wharton though and is super hyped. Wharton's name was in the media but still fairly unknown.

I think Leeds would ask for £40m for Gray, and of course if they come up he's going nowhere.

Agree on Gallagher, but we already get that from Sarr, and peak Bentancur is basically a perfect #8 this system. We could buy Gallagher only for him to be redundant next year.

Elite #6's are like gold dust but they're also arguably the most important position in football, I don't think we can afford to go a season without solving that problem. Even if it's with a sub-optimal solution like an Onana or Uguarte. Every #6 bar Rodri has some trade-offs in terms of what they're strong/weak at.

Fair point. I do feel we should have made much more use of Gio while Maddison has been getting back to full fitness but having two injury-prone #10s isn't ideal. And maybe if we do bring Eze we should look to offload Kulu cos by then he really would be a bit redundant.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I've got a mate who is a Blackburn fan and said at the time Wharton was a better bet than Phillips and now reckons they have a brilliant 16 year old now?
 
bus-conductor said:
“Couldn’t get near him” What a load of bollocks. He was barely in the game and hardly saw any of the ball. He only completed 22 passes all game, Bissouma did more than double that in 60min. Sarr and Bentancur the same in 30 minutes. Our midfield dominated the ball that game (63 possession) it was our forwards that were shite. He was a busy little fucker as usual, without the ball, but let’s keep it real.

I don’t hate the idea of Gallagher as much as some, in as much as we could replace Hojbjerg, Bentancur and Skipp’s skill set with one HG player - as long as that’s what we do and clear out that dead wood.

He could be a Rice/Henderson type of up and downer who chips in with a handful of goals/assists whilst also being a defensive busy cunt with a good engine and decent mobility.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

ok
 
Klaus said:
Yes I remember him yapping on about our massive warchest in summer 2018. Of course we then became the first club in history to spend nothing in one window. I called him out and of course got kicked off the forum for it.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Really? Who were you on there?

I remember that window on SC, but don't recall any ITK being called out other than that clown aquayid, or whatever his name was.
 
Raf said:
Winning aerial duels and tackles are by far his biggest strength, even the stats show that. I'm sure you've been able to see at least that much from him.

I don't think he's great on the ball, but he is able to keep the ball which would benefit us. Retention has been an issue this season for us.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I'd argue that's more an issue with our forward line than our midfield TBH. They don't really recycle the ball well enough when their options are limited, and are generally poor at protecting the ball when their back is to goal.

I agree with the sentiment that a quality DM would stiffen our spine significantly, but I think upgrading the frontline would go further towards improving our ball retention.

I really haven't seen that much of Onana to form an opinion, but is he a player that would improve us over the long term, or would he end up surplus as we look to progress further?
 
Gallagher will be yet another waste of money

A hojberg 2.0 kind of signing

Likes of City and Liverpool will be quaking in their boots
 
Ionman34 said:
I'd argue that's more an issue with our forward line than our midfield TBH. They don't really recycle the ball well enough when their options are limited, and are generally poor at protecting the ball when their back is to goal.

I agree with the sentiment that a quality DM would stiffen our spine significantly, but I think upgrading the frontline would go further towards improving our ball retention.

I really haven't seen that much of Onana to form an opinion, but is he a player that would improve us over the long term, or would he end up surplus as we look to progress further?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Agreed, the forwards need to retain in the final third as opposed to always looking for the final ball because it won't always be on and it'll just lead to more turnovers.

I still think having a player like that is useful in stopping transitions, because they will inevitably occur just due to the way we play. But the root issue of those transitions occurring in the first place, the inability to retain, would definitely still need to be addressed.

I think he improves the team at the moment. As for the long term, I don't really know. I saw Jesus improve the scum his first season to title contenders and he's already seen as a surplus in his second season with them.

Things move quickly in football. Any of us can spot good players, I suppose it's questions like that where the recruitment team earns their money.
 
Ionman34 said:
Really? Who were you on there?

I remember that window on SC, but don't recall any ITK being called out other than that clown aquayid, or whatever his name was.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Does it matter who I was?

Plenty of people called him out, as they do every year as he's a Grade-A bullshit artist. And plenty of people get kicked off there cos the mods are trigger-happy and desperate to protect their precious fake ITKs so they can justify asking for donations whenever they come round with their begging bowl
 
Richard Arlison said:
What’s his fee likely to be?

Wharton was an initial 18m and had a bigger CV possibly.

Championship players don’t go for huge fees. If Leeds go up, the fee does too.


Gray would get minutes rotation at RB and some CM. I think mostly RB to start with.

Gallagher gives you pressing and ball winning. I just don’t see an elite level #6 Out there this summer.

We need competition for Maddison not a back up. He gets injured from all the hacks he takes. Eze or MGW can both compete to start with him imo. We had zero creativity since Maddison’s first injury and he’s only just getting back in form again now. Can’t be in that position again.

CHO can play either side. Summerville is pretty much LW only you are right
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
On the Madders competition, I can see that being a combination of Kulu and Bergvall this year with a view to Kulu being replaced by Devine or Donley in 25/26.
 
Klaus said:
Agree to disagree on Onana. Defensively he's an animal, levels above Bissouma in that regard. On the ball he's unspectacular but safe, and underrated. He doesn't have Bissouma's ball carrying ability (not that we've seen much of that since October) but he certainly loses it far less.

Onana vs England

As for Bissouma's consistency, this is just who he is, Brighton fans will confirm. He's either the best DM in the world or a disinterested liability. Sadly for us that ratio has been roughly 1:10 in his time here, can't be relying on someone like that in such a crucial position. Give me 7/10 Onana performances over that any day of the week.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Level above Bissouma defensively?



And Onana plays for a more defensive team as well
 
Klaus said:
Ha I know. The Mikey Moore comparison was a joke. I just don't know if you could call Palmer PL proven last summer when all he'd had was a smattering of sub appearances.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Yea, I was stretching it a bit...but he had 19 appearances and Man City & Pep did not want him to leave and, from Chelksi had seen on of him they felt did not hesitate in paying the fee of £45m.
PS! Part of being EPL proven is being born in Manchester and staying there for 20 years ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top