I haven't blamed the fans once. Stop reading what you want to see.
You did previously and you are above:
"because of the high standards of the fanbase"
^^^Is bollocks.
He's in exile cos his fitness and attitude stinks.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I haven't blamed the fans once. Stop reading what you want to see.
I'd prefer a player that A wants to play 90 mins and B can play 90 mins.He's being used perfectly there. Putting a player of Ndombele's ability on in the second half of games at times is pretty much a cheat code at certain levels. He'll destroy tired legs with his ability.
Which as I mentioned before, isn't really possible here because of the high standards of the fanbase based on his transfer fee and wages.
That I would agree with, the Prem is furious, frenetic, fast and a few other words beginning with F
"because of the high standards of the fanbase"
^^^Is bollocks.
He's in exile cos his fitness and attitude stinks.
I'd prefer a player that A wants to play 90 mins and B can play 90 mins.
Wish him well there & hope we get his wages off the books ASAP. Nothing personal, he’s had his chances in the PL imo.That I would agree with, the Prem is furious, frenetic, fast and a few other words beginning with F
Would you prefer a player that A) can play 40-60 minutes as an impact sub/starter or B) force the player to play 90 minutes until he fails and then sit that player on the bench and pay his salary.I'd prefer a player that A wants to play 90 mins and B can play 90 mins.
In a perfect world I'd like C, get rid of the lazy cunt and get him off the wage bill.Would you prefer a player that A) can play 40-60 minutes as an impact sub/starter or B) force the player to play 90 minutes until he fails and then sit that player on the bench and pay his salary.
I'll take A. I think we can all agree we'd prefer a player that can play 90, but we already bought Ndombele so the cost is sunk.
Ndombele has value as that impact sub player but because of the record signing fiasco and I don't think he was well liked by spurs players or supporters, he had no shot of turning into a role player here.
It's not bollocks at all.
We all know of Ndombele's deficiencies. But we knew all these before we signed him. So why as a fanbase were we expecting something from him that he never provided?
We didn't sign him for upwards of £50,000,000 to track runners, be the hardest working midfielder in the team and defend like his life depended on it. We signed him (for an astronomical fee for sure) to be a press resistant midfielder who can move the ball forward.
I haven't blamed the fans once on Ndombele's failure here. He doesn't train as well as a professional footballer should, his attitude has been called into question plenty of times (as it was BEFORE we signed him) and he is to blame.
Again, it's like City fans (or any other fans really) complaining about Grealish not scoring enough goals or doing his defensive work when he cost £100,000,000 despite everyone knowing that Man City didn't sign Grealish to score goals or do the defensive work.
It's not bollocks at all.
We all know of Ndombele's deficiencies. But we knew all these before we signed him. So why as a fanbase were we expecting something from him that he never provided?
We didn't sign him for upwards of £50,000,000 to track runners, be the hardest working midfielder in the team and defend like his life depended on it. We signed him (for an astronomical fee for sure) to be a press resistant midfielder who can move the ball forward.
I haven't blamed the fans once on Ndombele's failure here. He doesn't train as well as a professional footballer should, his attitude has been called into question plenty of times (as it was BEFORE we signed him) and he is to blame.
Again, it's like City fans (or any other fans really) complaining about Grealish not scoring enough goals or doing his defensive work when he cost £100,000,000 despite everyone knowing that Man City didn't sign Grealish to score goals or do the defensive work.
Jesus wept. This isn't pre-school.The way I see it, it's hard for us to keep a player on the books, being paid so much, training so little, producing what we need so little, without disrupting the wage structure and harmony within the club. Maybe he could be a good impact sub here, but I feel like the effect of his presence within the squad would be demoralizing and enabling, and set a bad standard for the other players.
Levy and Paratici need to just chalk it up as a loss, learn what they can from it, endeavour not to repeat that mistake, and move on- we've got a lot more important shit to worry about right now than trying to turn a profit from Ndombele.
What? My point was that it sets an unacceptably low standard among the other players to accept his presence at the club.Jesus wept. This isn't pre-school.
Any professional athletes that are demoralized that they aren't making £200K/wk should:
1. Try not sucking.
2. Work harder.
3. Repeat.
4. ___________________
There are a handful of players at Spurs that (IMO) set unacceptably low standards and Ndombele is not one of them.What? My point was that it sets an unacceptably low standard among the other players to accept his presence at the club.