• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Player The Injury & Suspension Thread 2025/26

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Here is a list of our top 10 wages:
5 of them are out for the rest of the season.
Maddison we hope could be available.

1Simons£10,140,000£195,000
2Romero£10,140,000£195,000
3Maddison£8,840,000£170,000
4Gallagher£8,320,000£160,000
5Kudus£7,800,000£150,000
6Muani£7,800,000£150,000
7Solanke£7,280,000£140,000
8Palhinha£7,020,000£135,000
9Kulusevski£5,720,000£110,000
10Richarlison£4,680,000£90,000
 
Players injuries are due to home stadium retractble pitch, the ground is hard compared to normal pitches weakening leg joints and ligaments.....etc making our players prone to serious injuries..
 
Last edited:
Players injuries are due to home stadium retractble pitch, the ground is hard compared to normal pitches weakening leg joints and ligaments.....etc making our players prone to serious injuries..
Was our injury record similar under Jose or Conte?

If it was, then I might buy into that.

And we don't train on it, so it's hard to make a solid case for that for me (are our training pitches normal turf-to-soil?).

Is the same system used anywhere else?

Any equivalent data of increase dinjury cases?
 
Was our injury record similar under Jose or Conte?

If it was, then I might buy into that.

And we don't train on it, so it's hard to make a solid case for that for me (are our training pitches normal turf-to-soil?).

Is the same system used anywhere else?

Any equivalent data of increase dinjury cases?

first 3 seasons we played at new stadium, no unusual injury stats - just last 2 seasons.

so this 'its the new stadium pitch' is a baseless rumour.
 
Was our injury record similar under Jose or Conte?

If it was, then I might buy into that.

And we don't train on it, so it's hard to make a solid case for that for me (are our training pitches normal turf-to-soil?).

Is the same system used anywhere else?

Any equivalent data of increase dinjury cases?
Yes; linear progression
No.
No.
 
Yes; linear progression
No.
No.
If it was the pitch it wouldn't be a progression, as the pitch is a constant, so it would be constant across seasons since it's been used.

Can't immediately see why that wouldn't be the case.

Not that I'm emotionally invested in the pitch; it could well be that.

But it would need to make total sense to me.
 
Was thinking the other day that all this talk about our pitch being the problem is really bad.
Not that I thin it is the pitch, but if this story gains traction, it's going to be a major turn off for players coming to the club in the future.
Who's going to want to play on a cursed pitch? Even if it's a total fallacy, players aren't going to take the risk.
Well we are able to attract players altough we obviously are a cursed club, so what difference will a cursed pitch do?

Jokes aside. I really think the club should do a thorough investigation into why we have had this insane injury record the last couple of seasons.

We have had different managers and training methods, but still an insane amount of injurys.

Wouldn't surprise me the slightest if it is because the surfaces on either the training ground, stadium, or both
 
Does RM have the same kind of pitch as us?

And their injuries have gone through the roof too

We started playing in our stadium 5 years ago and training ground longer ago than that.

Our above normal injuries have been in 25/26 (this season) and 24/25 (previous season - with some injuries in that season carried forward to 25/26)

So given the 3 seasons before 24/25 we did NOT have unusually high injuries there is NO connection between high injuries and our stadium/training ground
 
Well we are able to attract players altough we obviously are a cursed club, so what difference will a cursed pitch do?

Jokes aside. I really think the club should do a thorough investigation into why we have had this insane injury record the last couple of seasons.

We have had different managers and training methods, but still an insane amount of injurys.

Wouldn't surprise me the slightest if it is because the surfaces on either the training ground, stadium, or both

The explanation is very simple.

We started 24/25 with a relatively lean squad - having got in the summer transfer window Solanke, Gray, Bergvall and Odobert, both Gray and Bergvall were young/inexperienced with Bergvall not starting a match until Christmas time, whilst Odobert picked up an injury pretty quickly). And a manager known for his tactics of a high line which means all players run more than in other clubs - so its a really physically demanding way to play football, and players WILL pick up more injuries than usual, although great to watch

We started well before meeting Chelsea in early December who used all the dark arts possible to cripple Maddison, Van de Ven, Romero and one or two others followed by a Villa match when Cash crippled Bentancur, and I think we lost another to injury.

So in 2 matches Spurs lost about 6 or 7 first team starters, including both centre backs (forcing us to buy a third, Dragusin, in January) from a lean squad.

So with half a team, including most of our best players, out we bring in alternatives but having a lean squad, we do not have much chance of rotation and we are playing twice a week (PL and EL), so we have to over play all the players not giving them much rest ....... so inevitably we lose some other players to injury.

So the issue very simply is losing players to injury and waiting for others to get fit - which lasts throughout 24/25.

And going into 25/26 we find Maddison, Kulusevski and Dragusin unfit, and Solanke thought to be fit unable to start a game until Christmas. And had not brought in many players in summer so number of fit players we have only gives us a lean squad ...... and send our most experienced youngsters on loan rather than keep a few back as cover

So we start with a few injured players and we repeat same cycle as in 24/25 of waiting to get injured players back .

Its nothing complicated - start a season with too many key players out injured and are surprised when over playing remaining players results in a few more injuries.

Its basic man management (or lack of it) and nothing complicated about pitches - and that's why Lange needs to go for not recognising the problems caused by lean squads.
 
Here is a list of our top 10 wages:
5 of them are out for the rest of the season.
Maddison we hope could be available.

1Simons£10,140,000£195,000
2Romero£10,140,000£195,000
3Maddison£8,840,000£170,000
4Gallagher£8,320,000£160,000
5Kudus£7,800,000£150,000
6Muani£7,800,000£150,000
7Solanke£7,280,000£140,000
8Palhinha£7,020,000£135,000
9Kulusevski£5,720,000£110,000
10Richarlison£4,680,000£90,000
2 of them we don't even own.
So its basically Gallagher and Richy plus Madders when he decides to stop being a cheerleader.
 
Our squad v Villa :

Kinsky, Pedro Porro, Danso, van de Ven (c), Udogie, Bentancur (Bissouma 66), Gallagher, Palhinha, Kolo Muani (Spence 66), Richarlison (Sarr 90+1), Tel (Bergvall 90+1).
Substitutes (not used): Austin, Dragusin, Souza, Gray, Maddison.


Looks like we have a full squad to call on without including any youngsters - albeit Maddison has still to play his season - providing no injuries suffered in Villa match.

Solanke (and maybe Vicario) are probably the only players who might be available to join the squad for the last couple of games

So our injury list of the other players not mentioned above is now :

Davies, Romero, Kulusevski (faint possibility of return this season), Simons, Kudus, Odobert

So that's our full 28 player squad this season - 20 in match day squad and 8 players not fully fit or maybe just injured
 
Last edited:
Back
Top