Danny MurphyAnd not just with us, with ANY pair of clubs.
I want to say it was like 24?
Berbatov, Dembele, Scott Parker, Sessegnon, Clint Dempsey, Kasey Keller, Malbranque, am I missing other obvious ones?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Danny MurphyAnd not just with us, with ANY pair of clubs.
I want to say it was like 24?
Berbatov, Dembele, Scott Parker, Sessegnon, Clint Dempsey, Kasey Keller, Malbranque, am I missing other obvious ones?
I said I don't care and have no idea who they have signed. koda takai?You obviously do care who the players are because you aren't counting Koda Takai
O'Hara played for Fulham for a minute didn't he?
He did indeed. One season I think.
Obviously you don't speak Ghanian where I come from, Kudus and Uno are the same.
Holy shit, so you're saying that my opinion came from my head? That's incredibly fucking perspicuous of you.Next weekend we play Luton i so will not be flying anywhere next week - likely early following following week.
We have a full squad already - 37 players listed in preseason squad ( including yoingsters) so likely to sell a net 2 or 3 players. So this idea we will not sign players later is just out of your head - not routed in any reasoning. Not to mention last summer we signed Odobert after the start of the season ( he played his first game of the season for Burnley)
Holy shit, so you're saying that my opinion came from my head? That's incredibly fucking perspicuous of you.
Not routed in any reasoning? I stated my reasoning. You might not agree with it but that doesn't dismiss its presence.
In summary. Shut the fuck up and watch your tone.
TBF, I wouldn't count Danso because it was an obligation, right?
Now this is the TFC I remember and adore.Holy shit, so you're saying that my opinion came from my head? That's incredibly fucking perspicuous of you.
Not routed in any reasoning? I stated my reasoning. You might not agree with it but that doesn't dismiss its presence.
In summary. Shut the fuck up and watch your tone.

Obligation or not, the transfer was carried out this Summer, it's still money going out for the player who was originally a loan but is now fully COYS.TBF, I wouldn't count Danso because it was an obligation, right?
But we didn't have to sign Tel, the fact that we trialed him for 4 months doesn't mean buying him isn't new business.
3 real "ins" by my count.
Think it's more the fact he's capable cover for a position we need covering along with being club trained.
Well if you get pedantic, only some if the money is going out this summer. Payment in installments is so common, that I don't think when money is paid is a relevant standard these days.Obligation or not, the transfer was carried out this Summer, it's still money going out for the player who was originally a loan but is now fully COYS.
In the absence of publicly available understandings of how exactly the payment structures work on every deal this definitely seems like the best way to do it to me as well.Well if you get pedantic, only some if the money is going out this summer. Payment in installments is so common, that I don't think when money is paid is a relevant standard these days.
For me it's when the commitment to take a player on a permanent transfer is contractually agreed between both clubs and player. In Danso's case, that was January.
I do often wonder why there's such a lack of transparency about financial transactions in football.In the absence of publicly available understandings of how exactly the payment structures work on every deal this definitely seems like the best way to do it to me as well.
That said, all the aggregators of this information book the fee in the window when the obligation triggers rather than when it was made, which to me is a not as good but also not totally insane methodological choice, so I've kinda just accepted thinking about it that way.
Essentially we bought Danso for Summer 2025 and got a "free sample" of a half season.
(It definitely leaves lingering questions of how exactly it works with player contracts and the like but oh no I've gone cross-eyed)
One, inertia and two, you scratch a millimeter below the surface and it's a hallucinogenic carnival of tax evasion, would be my guesses.I do often wonder why there's such a lack of transparency about financial transactions in football.
To be honest Will, I don't really care when he was signed, just that he was signedWell if you get pedantic, only some if the money is going out this summer. Payment in installments is so common, that I don't think when money is paid is a relevant standard these days.
For me it's when the commitment to take a player on a permanent transfer is contractually agreed between both clubs and player. In Danso's case, that was January.
Approximately 8.2 billion people