No, my point is the club should want to get some info out there.
Why?
Waging some kind of mudslinging match via the clickbait merchants achieves nothing.
What's meaningful is what happens between the lawyers and at the negotiation table.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
No, my point is the club should want to get some info out there.
You have some very weird fantasies.Even if you wanted to, you wouldn't get access to the ugly smelly tiny thing...LP, the Japanese puzzle and Fixter called shotgun ages ago.
Guys, seriously...can you not take this convo to a separate thread?Its not a blind assumption, the rates of sponsorship deals grow exponentially. And that is not unique to Spurs.
The money spent on transfers and wages is a direct reflection of the global exponential growth in broadcasting and marketing revenue within football.
The idea that we should take £10/yr (BetMGM already pays more than that on a short term deal for the training kit) for 20 years for the naming rights is preposterous. That amount of money is already entirely negligible. Within 5 years it would be a miniscule benefit we'd tied down to for another 15 years. By the final 5 years of the deal it wouldnt be enough to pay a U-21's wages.
Anyway - this is all hypothetical, again, as we're not selling our stadium naming rights any time soon - if at all. It's pure fantasy that its this great windfall waiting to happen.
Supporters always fuck this up.
We love football. We obsess over it and spend our free time on it.
For professional footballers, it is very much a job.
If it doesn’t go through we should be able to sue Forest for millions though, they literally ignored legal contract.
Oh God no
Cochrane uses the example of coaching Garnacho to stop chopping onto his right foot all the time, and to trust his left more. Garnacho takes the coaching, and scores for the first team with his left.
Something very fishy is going on with Chelsea.
Valuation of N.Jackson is 80m +. A joke amount, but it being Chelsea they'll probably get it.
They bought Veiga for 14m and he played less than 10 times for them before being loaned out. Now talk Athletico will buy him for triple the amount.
They consistently sell their unwanted players for huge money.
Their (published) wages are not even that high any more, but still seem to attract player after player.
What's going on? Could they be paying backhanders to players/agents/clubs? Any other explanation?
Something very fishy is going on with Chelsea.
Valuation of N.Jackson is 80m +. A joke amount, but it being Chelsea they'll probably get it.
They bought Veiga for 14m and he played less than 10 times for them before being loaned out. Now talk Athletico will buy him for triple the amount.
They consistently sell their unwanted players for huge money.
Their (published) wages are not even that high any more, but still seem to attract player after player.
What's going on? Could they be paying backhanders to players/agents/clubs? Any other explanation?
I think you're overstating this. It's probably a lot more true of US sports, for instance, where sports are stratified accordingly but in Europe and South America the vibe is very different. Most kids love and play football as a passion, and the best ones are funneled into clubs at an early age, becoming entirely absorbed into the culture.
For every Benoit Assou-Ekotto or David Bentley there are a hundred professional players whose greatest desire is to score in a World Cup final, and even the richest players on Earth are still playing for love of the game.
So we stop cluttering up all the talk about transfers Tottenham are surely never going to make?Guys, seriously...can you not take this convo to a separate thread?


You're just bitter cause James Ward-Prowse would rather go back to West Ham than play for youse again.Firstly, half of those are not true. And the ones that are true, we were complaining about we got completely shafted over.
Maybe think independently & don't just believe everything you are fed.
I, nor do any Forest fans really care what people think about us when we feel our club is getting shafted. Maybe your owner should have the same passion for the club.
Been here before haven’t we ? Can’t even say the reaction to the whole saga gives confidence. Nothing much, if any optimism, let’s hope Tel has some unexpected Jedi like rise next season or Kudas is first season good, not second season bad.
Maranakis is throwing a tantrum and just like when toddlers do it, we are ignoring him.
Hopefully he won’t reach the stage of throwing his own faeces at people…
As I keep saying, our owners hide behind it whilst others range from working around it, to flat out ignoring it.And yet, people go on about PSR and yet, certain clubs are not bothered in the slightest.
They have some squad, no messing about it seems, no doubt they will be top four along with pool, city, and arse, but to be expected I guess.
I've been pretty much in the "No to Garnacho" camp, because I assumed he'd breach Frank's "no dickheads" rule.
But it turns out Spurs have insider knowledge because Justin Cochrane coached him. Not only that, it seems Garnacho is more coachable than I imagined.
This clip is fascinating both in terms of the insights into Garnacho, but also Cochrane as a coach, and how he helped develop him. Just to add, Cochrane comes over very well.
I think this type of insider knowledge of a player is an important part of assessing whether a player is worth signing. It provides information the data analysis alone can't provide.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuEIEXtneD0