The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Plenty of footballers play late into their 30s because they've spanked their money and, even if they have some, they can't make that sort of money (even at a lower club or overseas) anywhere else.Bullshit lmao, you have so many footballers who play in to their late thirties/forties when their bodies are literally breaking down (Suarez!!!) because they love the sport so much, even when fabulously wealthy and they could do many other things in the sport. Why are you comparing it to a normal job? Nobody dreams of sitting in an office as a kid, footballers got that good because it was a passion..
There are work elements to it and I'm sure they want a break and it gets tiring but the good ones love and live it and its as much a passion as a job .. loads of footballers obsess/spend free time on football as well.
Yes Levy is not that well liked in the fanbase but he does tend to act carefully and stay within the rules. But anyway you don't know if Levy has done anything wrong on this occasion, as you keep saying, it's not discussions that have occurred publicly. You don't seem to be able to heed your own advice and not discuss what you don't know.Thanks for clarifying all the facts of the situation. It is great to have a great discussion based on facts.
Keep coping fellas. For a fan base that doesn't particularly like your owner, it's amazing how he can do no wrong.
The "violation" in that moment would be clear, but not the fact that this saga is still running on.Spurs had a medical booked for the player, so if they didn't activate the clause nor get approval from the club - the dispute is clear.
Firstly, half of those are not true. And the ones that are true, we were complaining about we got completely shafted over.BTW it's worth noting that this club are a bunch of Karen's, they complain about everything. They complained to UEFA about Palace, they complained to Sky about Gary Neville, they complained to the PGMOL about refereeing in the Everton and Bournemouth matches, they complained to the Premier League about a goal scored by Ivan Toney ffs
I think that people need to accept that it was probably us that fucked up and not their nutter owner.If we genuinely hadn't done something wrong there is no way we'd be taking this shit from forest like we are
There would be action , but it seems like we are just sat quietly in the corner
Correct, I don't know that & at the same time you guys don't know that Forest have done anything. That is the point with this thing, there is a lack of facts because most of it comes down to contract law. The facts that we know are Spurs bid, booked a medical - then Forest ceased all contact & complained to the Premier League.Yes Levy is not that well liked in the fanbase but he does tend to act carefully and stay within the rules. But anyway you don't know if Levy has done anything wrong on this occasion, as you keep saying, it's not discussions that have occurred publicly. You don't seem to be able to heed your own advice and not discuss what you don't know.
Firstly, half of those are not true. And the ones that are true, we were complaining about we got completely shafted over.
Maybe think independently & don't just believe everything you are fed.
I, nor do any Forest fans really care what people think about us when we feel our club is getting shafted. Maybe your owner should have the same passion for the club.
There is nothing to say Levy has ignored anything. I am a Levy Out person so I have no reason to defend him. If Levy put a £60m release clause in a contract and I thought it was way to low I would be pissed off with Levy for putting it there in the first place but not in a million years would I expect Levy break a release clause. He is many things but he wouldn’t flagrantly break a contract.
Forest complaint is ‘tapping up’ and which is how every single team in the league includes your builds squads as Simon Jordan a former owner talks about. You speak to the agent who asks the player are you willing to come. If the agent tells the club yes then Spurs speak to Forest to speak with the player. The gray area is speaking with the agent but that is now how most transfers work. Athletico Madrid speak with our Romero all the time asking him to come, we ain’t taking Atletico Madrid to court. Regarding the release clause if the agent informs us of it that is the agents issue not ours, they have any NDA, we don’t.
Clearly there was a trigger of the release clause as it was confirmed you allowed a medical. That wouldn’t happened without agreement. Everyone knows your owner is a wild man. So why would an agreed transfer suddenly stop. Why would a triggered release clause suddenly not work. Just as Levy is known for lowballing transfer offer so your Greek guy is known for throwing toys out of the pram.
View: https://x.com/fabrizioromano/status/1943346490476269694?s=46&t=Gc6HrWVZT0mtSXU7r8ZBIQ
So the owner was happy to let him go then 5 minutes later decided he wasn't & threw his toys out the pram. What logic you are bringing to the conversation. The medical was booked as the bid went in, not when the bid was accepted.If you don't care about what people think about your club then why the fuck are you on here protesting about your club acting as if you can do no wrong?
In terms of this deal it's pretty simple what happened, Spurs matched the clause, you guys were initially happy to let him go hence the why he was booked in for a medical then your fat cunt of an owner threw his toys out the pram.
Well but that's consistent with the reporting that Forest had been attempting to maintain confidentiality around that clauseThere wasn't even any reports there was any clauses in MGW's contract before this whole thing even came about.
The explanation that makes the most sense to me is that MGW did in fact knowingly breach the confidentiality of his release clause, given the timing perhaps out of frustration with Elanga getting the move up to CL club that MGW had wanted.I think that people need to accept that it was probably us that fucked up and not their nutter owner.
Some reports have stated we booked him in for a medical without Forests permission (which I don't believe tbh).If you don't care about what people think about your club then why the fuck are you on here protesting about your club acting as if you can do no wrong?
In terms of this deal it's pretty simple what happened, Spurs matched the clause, you guys were initially happy to let him go hence the why he was booked in for a medical then your fat cunt of an owner threw his toys out the pram.
Let's be real, it's looking like we didn't cover all bases on this apparent release clause.
yeah, I'm not sure why some people are so confident this is still gonna happen
the release clause clearly meant jack shit
So the owner was happy to let him go then 5 minutes later decided he wasn't & threw his toys out the pram. What logic you are bringing to the conversation. The medical was booked as the bid went in, not when the bid was accepted.
Talks are ongoing between the two clubs but Tottenham do not anticipate any issues.
This is true lol.