• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers The Summer Transfer Edging Thread 2025

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

In your opinion, which I respect, but not for me. Just not consistent enough!
May be but which player is? Also he has had two years of Ange where he was basically our only creative player so all the pressure was on him. Then he had FBs playing in his position. To me when he came on v goons he adds that little bit extra control and keeping the ball with little passes and one twos. No other player offfers what he does.
 
Good signing Paulinha. May not be the no6 most wanted - but he is certainly a profile we don’t have in squad.

Hope is he has still got that sharpness from 2 yrs back. If he brings that form ,we have some player on our hands. He will free up likes of Bergvall Maddison
I think the intention would be for him to rotate. Also o don’t think we need him for some games where we will have most of the ball but b likes of pool and citeh he’d be useful.
 
TBF, we hired a manager who spent decades as a youth coach and I don't think it was coincidental. I don't think "backing Frank" looks like what you think it does.

Like Poch, he wasn't brought to Spurs to buy a squad for. He was brought to Spurs to get players like VDV, Spence, Johnson, Odobert, Bergvall, Sarr, etc. to kick on and become the next generation of top Spurs talent
Yes Stel was trying to make this point on the spurs 5 but the others were shutting him down. I think the point was under levy we arnt going to buy a PL winning team. Frank was bought in partly bcos the need to develop players not give him ready made players like a conte would have wanted.
 
Assuming that this means Bissouma is headed for the exit. With Gray, Bergvall and Sarr still being young; an older more experienced head in midfield.

Watching Spurs play against Woolwich yesterday, gave some hints on the style that Frank may adopt. It looks like we will surrender possession and sit back. The forwards won't press their defenders aggressivity, but once the ball comes into the centre of the pitch, the midfielders will steal the ball and play it quickly to the forwards.
This the thing Frank said he knew about spurs traditions, wanted to play front foot attacking football. But really he is going to be more conte ball. Will fans accept that?
 
Odobert for me has really top potential. But if you sell Son you need another winger and Malik Fofana would be a top signing: he is ambidextrous and can play on left and right.

As creative midfielders you have Maddison, Kulusevski and Bergvall, they are good players but you could add another and El Khannouss is a top talent.

But the real problem is the striker. I agree: i don't think you will sign another, but this is a mistake: you lack goals. Solanke can be a squad player, not a starter for a CL team, sign him for 65m was a mistake and you should accept this.
I’d just go get eze or Simmons
 
HOw many times have you seen Zubamendi play? Did you follow every game os Real Socidad last season. Does the spanish league replicate the intensity of the Prem. Obviousily with the scum and Liverpool's interest he is rated highly but he did not stand out massively against a midfield that consisted of Cassemiro and Fernandes playing deep.
just to clarify; When I call him a great footballer - I’m not referring to his level of performance, simply his attributes. On paper he’s composed, technical, and makes high IQ decisions.

For top sides (which everyone wants us to be) I’m always wary of midfielders whose best attribute is simply “tackling”, these types don’t last long. (see Ugarte)

Fans get too caught up in the mythology of these shin kickers, even lionised players like Graham Roberts, Roy Keane, Edgar Davids etc. find their actual ability on the ball (all excellent) becoming criminally underrated because of it.
 
Another youngster linked



AIK's Kevin Filling had a dream debut in the Allsvenskan when the 16-year-old scored in his debut against IFK Göteborg.
Since then, the striker has been sidelined with an injury that has kept him out of action.
Now Expressen reports that both Manchester United and Tottenham are interested in Filling and have made concrete inquiries about the player.
It is worth adding to the information that after Brexit (Great Britain's withdrawal from the EU), English clubs cannot sign foreign players before they are 18 years old.
But according to the newspaper, Manchester United wanted to sign the 16-year-old and then loan him to Lausanne in Switzerland. Tottenham have also proposed a deal where Filling is bought and then loaned back to AIK.
PL clubs reportedly want to snap up Filling before he makes more of an impact and the price increases.

The Expressen link is behind a paywall.
Allsvenska kulisserna: Storklubbar scoutar AIK-talang • Här kan Kiese…

Big clubs scout Kevin Filling in AIK
Kevin Filling, 16, made his Allsvenskan debut just under a month ago and got a dream start in the AIK shirt by scoring in the home match against IFK Göteborg.
Shortly afterwards, the club chose to sign a three-year A-team contract with the promising striker. Although Filling has only played one match in the Allsvenskan so far, his performance has already attracted interest from several big foreign clubs.
According to information to Expressen, both Manchester United and Tottenham have made concrete inquiries about the player. Manchester United reportedly want to sign him and then loan him to Lausanne in Switzerland, while Tottenham have proposed a deal where Filling is bought and then loaned back to AIK. The reason the Premier League clubs have already expressed their interest is because they want to buy Filling now before he breaks through and the price skyrockets.
However, according to the same sources, AIK has no plans to sell. The club has clearly indicated that they want to keep the attacking talent to give him continued playing time in the A-team and allow him to develop in his own environment. A sale is not currently an option.
 
Palhinha, Gray, Bentancur, sarr, bergvall, maddison, kulu.
7 players for 6 positions. That's our options for the midfield 3. We may lineup many games with sarr or bergvall etc instead of a traditional 10. Similar to the more workhorse like midfield Liverpool used to use.

Odobert, Tel, kudus, johnson, richy, solanke. That's 6 players for 3 positions. Also its not strong enough imo.

Im absolutely all for having a very solid base to the team, keeps G/A low and being stubborn bastards to play against. But if you don't have enough for other teams to worry about going the other way then you're in trouble.

I did not see all the game yesterday but we probably found that once we lost the threat of kudus and instead had johnson thats when Woolwich really pushed on and penned us in abit?
We need another quality wide player or a physical monster out wider to carry the threat.
I posted something similar recently. We could have workman like midfield like dippers did but you need a front three who have pace, skill and goal scoring ability not to mention hard working. That dippers 3 of salah mane and bobby worked their socks off. I’m afraid our attackers are pants bar kudus who we have just signed. Everyone goes on about tel and Wilson saying they have potential based on what ? Every player has potential. We needed top quality not punts.
 
Confused Eyes GIF by MOODMAN
 
You can’t understand why 30 year old Palhinha on loan is a cut price option, even despite the wages? I mean this to say, is this a semantics issue, or do you just genuinely not get it?

Cut-price deal is fair here bc he was signed for £55m last summer and Bayern have now literally cut his price in half, including a buy option for half that fee. They’ve clearly been doing everything they can to get rid and the buy option would see them lose £30m in value.

So, yes, this is an opportunistic deal with us getting a ready-now 6, as opposed to the proper quality long term solutions which have been rumoured like Baleba/Wharton. It doesn’t mean it’s a bad deal, but it does mean it’s a cut price deal.
£55m on a 5-year deal (I assume) would see his value to BM at about £33m 2-years in…? Plus he’s 2-years older, there’s an argument that we are over-paying…
 
Back
Top