• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Thomas Frank

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Are you Frank Out or In?


  • Total voters
    623
A key point you are missing is how few big teams there were in the EC of old vs the UEFA Cup of old

No, I'm not. I've literally addressed this 4 times already, and am waiting for someone to actually respond. Here it is again:

That's why we were in it. We came 4th the year before, behind Watford (2nd), but ahead of Forest (5th) and Villa (6th), all of whom were in the competition with us. The same is true for every league which participated, from Austria to Belgium.

Of course, the modern CL now takes the top 4 of every (big) league, so many of those clubs would now be in the higher competition, but most leagues still only get 1 or 2 teams qualified, and we all know that they're little more than fodder now for the big teams of the Big 5 leagues to gobble up at will. European football used to be more competitive in general before the modern period, and now it's ruled by a handful of clubs from an even smaller handful of leagues.

The best clubs not from the Big 5 leagues? They're all aiming for the Europa League now. That's who we beat, instead of the also-rans of the 80s. Not a whole lot of difference in quality, really.


Sad but true, as the concentration of wealth has meant only a few clubs now matter in the CL.

Exactly. The English Top 4, Spanish Top 3 and Bayern/PSG are basically the only ones expected to win. All the rest who are worth a damn have been trying for the EL

Exactly Back then the (many more) clubs that mattered split between the EC and UEFA, with more of them - due to the qualification mechanism - playing each year in the UEFA.

The clubs who were in the UEFA were the 5th and 6th best teams of England and Germany, and Croatia etc.

The Anderlecht team we beat was a who's who of Belgian football at the time.

Which isn't saying that much. Belgian football has never been particularly significant on the continent. The only time it became close to it was after all the Belgian players started playing in bigger leagues and thus learning how to play better football.

The other related point to make is that the title winner "in-year" is often a team that finished 2-5 the previous year. And were therefore the best team in their land, but in the UEFA Cup.

So it's not quite how you're describing it!

I'm simply pointing out how similar the quality levels were. I'm not even denigrating it. It's just that some are denigrating 2025, and don't like hearing how it's basically the same achievement.

The real difference is that nowadays, the PL is so much better than practically every other league that two teams who came 15th and 17th in England are able to beat off most of the rest of Europe.
 
We could do this for all the leagues, but just by way of example, looking at Serie A in 5 years in the second half of the 70s (random choice): Ask the question, did the team that won Serie A that year play in the EC that year or the UEFA Cup?

1974-75: UEFA

1975-76: Neither

1976-77: UEFA

1977-78: EC

1978-79: UEFA

And of course once you factor in a greater number of teams competing in the UEFA (vs the EC) who finish high up in their respective leagues, the point is only reinforced.

It's demonstrably not true to say the best teams usually or always played in the European Cup.

I think the Cup Winners Cup was often regarded as the easier competition to win for the English clubs because the other European leagues did not take the domestic cups that seriously.

The U.E.F.A. Cup was regarded as being harder to win because the 2nd 3rd 4th placed teams, from all of Europe's top leagues, were often all taking part in the U.E.F.A. Cup and as I have pointed out several times; it was a knock out competition all the way to the final.
 
It's demonstrably not true to say the best teams usually or always played in the European Cup.

That doesn't matter. The quality of teams in the UEFA that we faced is pretty much the same. We can do a fair comparison of the leagues/teams we played against, quite easily.

In the 2025 knockouts we played:

AZ Alkmar: 4th in Netherlands (6th best league)
Eintracht Frankfurt: 4th in Germany (3rd best league)
Bodo/Glint: 1st in Norway (12th best league)
Manchester United: 15th in England (1st best league)

In 1984 we played:

Drogheda United: 2nd in Ireland (24th best league(!!))
Feyenoord: 1st in Netherlands (12th best league)
Bayern Munich: 4th in Germany, (1st best league)
Hadjuk Split: 2nd in Croatia (8th best league)
Anderlecht: 2nd in Belgium (6th best league)

There's really not much difference at all. I think the reason why it upsets Kosher Kid and Ginola's Foot is because it fucks with their cherished yet unreliable childhood memories, and takes away their reason to denigrate what Levy achieved (which was to equal our best trophy since the early 60s).
 
Hey Everyone, I'm looking for the thread on Thomas Frank, am I in the wrong place?

This seems to be some sort of thread analysing the difference in calibre between the old UEFA Cup and modern Europa, with some sort of correlation with Ange.
 
Still can't answer why the format change actually didn't affect the quality level because of the supremacy of 3 leagues over everyone else, can you?

:angecup:
I really have tried to explain but you just don't get it.

A knock out competition, against stronger opposition, is harder to win than a group format competition where stronger opposition, from bigger domestic leagues, are seeded with the likes of Carabag, Ferencvaros and Bodo Glimpt.

The pressure of having to beat every team, over two legs, home and away is not the same as qualifying from a group that is set up for the strongest teams to win.

The historic U.E.F.A. Cup was widely regarded as being harder to win than the Champions Cup becaue of the volume of quality sides from Europes top leagues.

Those of us who are old enough to remember those days have an insight which you are lacking and sadly; making a fool of yourself over.

I do hope that someone can explain it to you in a way that you can understand.

Please do carry on insisting you are right though.

:dembelelol:
 
I really have tried to explain but you just don't get it.

That's because all you're offering me is the 'perspective' of a child from 40 years ago.

I'm giving you facts, instead. :)
A knock out competition, against stronger opposition, is harder to win than a group format competition where stronger opposition, from bigger domestic leagues, are seeded with the likes of Carabag, Ferencvaros and Bodo Glimpt.

None of that sentence is true. League format is notoriously harder to do, which is why Tottenham have only ever won 2 league titles but picked up 8 FA Cups.

It's also a fact that the knockout teams we faced in 1984 were not stronger than the teams we faced in 2025.


The historic U.E.F.A. Cup was widely regarded as being harder to win than the Champions Cup becaue of the volume of quality sides from Europes top leagues.

What, like the 2nd best team in Ireland?

Those of us who are old enough to remember those days have an insight

No, you don't. You have poor fucking memories, instead, my boy. Don't try and pull an age card on me or I'll remind you of dementia. Your ancient, unreliable and obviously biased perspective is a load of absolute bollocks compared to my youthful, newfangled fact-based one. :)

I'm happy to keep making it obvious that you're a fool.

:franklol:
 
Hey Everyone, I'm looking for the thread on Thomas Frank, am I in the wrong place?

This seems to be some sort of thread analysing the difference in calibre between the old UEFA Cup and modern Europa, with some sort of correlation with Ange.

It started because the Levy/Ange hate cult keep trying to pretend that our 2025 achievement isn't as good as 1984, just because they don't want it to be. I've just been explaining why that narrative is not true, but it's difficult to wrap up the exchange when they won't answer any facts and keep on devolving into childish nonsense.

Sorry for the derailment...
 
That's because all you're offering me is the 'perspective' of a child from 40 years ago.

I'm giving you facts, instead. :)


None of that sentence is true. League format is notoriously harder to do, which is why Tottenham have only ever won 2 league titles but picked up 8 FA Cups.

It's also a fact that the knockout teams we faced in 1984 were not stronger than the teams we faced in 2025.




What, like the 2nd best team in Ireland?



No, you don't. You have poor fucking memories, instead, my boy. Don't try and pull an age card on me or I'll remind you of dementia. Your ancient, unreliable and obviously biased perspective is a load of absolute bollocks compared to my youthful, newfangled fact-based one. :)

I'm happy to keep making it obvious that you're a fool.

:franklol:
I'm 55.

My memory is fine.

I've been supporting Spurs since 1977.

I've watched us play in all the European formats since the 81 / 82 Cup Winners Cup campaign.

I realise that watching Spurs win last seasons Europa League is the biggest achievement many younger Spurs supporters have to get hold of.

My 27 year old son was so happy about it.

I realised then that there is a huge difference between older and younger Spurs supporters in terms of expectation and what both groups have experienced in terms of success.

I admire your attempt to try and persuade me that the U.E.F.A. Cup wins of 1972 and 1984 were only as valid as last season's Europa win but;

I'm not having it.

It was great to win the Europa League in 2025 but having seen Spurs win both formats I have certainty about which one means more.

We will have to agree to disagree.
 
I'm 55.

My memory is fine.

No! It isn't! You just proved it!

:franklol:

You've been wrong about how good the competition was, and you've been wrong about which games you attended! Your memory is unreliable and if you are basing your 'perspective' on it then you're making a fool of yourself.

I realise that watching Spurs win last seasons Europa League is the biggest achievement many younger Spurs supporters have to get hold of.

What you don't realise is that it's the same size achievement as the biggest one that YOU have ever gotten hold of.

My 27 year old son was so happy about it.

I realised then that there is a huge difference between older and younger spurs supporters

Yes, there is: you can't fucking remember the past clearly. You only misremember it because of how good it made you feel when you were a child. You were your son, and in 40 years time he'll be telling his sons about how great it was and how the younger fans just can't understand blah blah blah.

I admire your attempt to try and persuade me that the U.E.F.A. Cup wins of 1972 and 1984 were only as valid as last season's Europa win

They were. You've just convinced yourself otherwise because like most bitter, miserable Levy-hating fans of today who were young in the 80s, you are telling yourself a lie about how good we were in the 80s because of how good it felt at the time, and so you can use it as a stick to beat the ownership with because they haven't made you feel that same way yet.

Rinse/repeat for the FA Cup.

We will have to agree to disagree.

Sure, but you can go fuck yourself if you are going to tell me that I'm not right just because I haven't been breathing as long as you were and was only 4 at the time you won the greatest thing you've ever seen. Take that shit and shove it up your jacksie. I'm right because all the data, stats, metrics and objective reality of the world of football backs me up.

You're still going off how you felt when you were 14 years old, and frankly, I'm not having that as an excuse to denigrate what we achieved last year.

Other than that, have a lovely day.

:adesalute:
 
Last edited:
It started because the Levy/Ange hate cult keep trying to pretend that our 2025 achievement isn't as good as 1984, just because they don't want it to be. I've just been explaining why that narrative is not true, but it's difficult to wrap up the exchange when they won't answer any facts and keep on devolving into childish nonsense.

Sorry for the derailment...
I mean, what does it matter?

The history books will show we won our third in 2025. Who gives a fuck who we beat lol
 
I agree.

But that's why I highlight the anti-Levy aspect, as it's the only reason why anyone is denigrating it at all.
I mean, you do you. We won a trophy, one that we haven't won for 41 years. Why people want to argue the toss about something that is a fantastic achievement, regardless of opposition, manager, owner, players, etc. Revel in the glory. It's what the game is about. Or something.
 
Back
Top