• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Thomas Frank

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Are you Frank Out or In?


  • Total voters
    623
Bentancur should absolutely be dropped.

Such a pity Gray is out, I'd be starting him. That lad has courage on the ball and wouldn't hide from it.

Midfield is a huge problem at the moment. No obvious answer currently.
 
I enjoyed the fight back at Brighton, and West Ham away was alright to.

The poor/shit games:

Bournemouth
Wolves
Villa (was OKish)
Chelsea

All at home of course.

Our approach to away games is fantastic. I believe you have to slow the game down and grind it out a lot of the time on the road if you want a decent return of points. And that's what we're doing.

Problem is, obviously, we're playing the same way at home.

I keep thinking Frank will let the handbrake off next home game that comes about, but he never does.

I'm amazed he thinks the same approach will work and the fans will come round to it.

This will go one of two ways in the next few weeks.

1) more of the same with the stadium getting toxic
2) or he'll change the approach at home and performances/results will improve and so will the atmosphere which in turn continues to help our home form

Interesting few weeks ahead.
I’ll give you that. Brighton was decent at times. West Ham away was one of those games we should have went and put a statement out and got the confidence up and go get 5 or 6 but we settled for 3 and never tried to score after Micky scored.
 
With how common mid season sackings are these days, clubs should put more effort in trying to have at least one more person in the staff with some kind of an experience in head coaching. Those who are/were already managing at top level obviously won't be lining up to be another manager's sidekick, but those managing on the lower levels could be tempted with an apprenticeship of this type. Little risk and possibly a very high reward in the form of being the eventual successor.

Otherwise you end up in these situations where a club doesn't see any future with the person in charge, but can't sack him before the season goes to waste either due to lack of an adequate replacement plan. Not where we're at right now, but in case we eventually got there our hands would be quite tied up.
I can see a few issues with this, firstly as you say, no top level coach is going to be up for this, so you're already choosing from a lower standard, secondly, if they're there as some sort of apprenticeship to level up, then they've been learning from the guy you've chosen to sack should it come to the situation that they may step up. That point then leads on to reception from the fans, this person would be viewed as part of the problem in the first place, so why would fans be any happier with this hypothetical person taking over?

It seems as though this was kind of attempted with Mason on numerous coaching staffs, and he got a ton of flack, online at least, for being a Levy plant.
 
I’ll give you that. Brighton was decent at times. West Ham away was one of those games we should have went and put a statement out and got the confidence up and go get 5 or 6 but we settled for 3 and never tried to score after Micky scored.
I call that the Poch special, so many times whilst we were genuinely outstanding I was hoping for a rout and we just stepped off the gas and settled.

In the present it would have been a really good opportunity to build some more confidence and develop a rhythm, I can see the logic in preserving ourselves for a busy fixture list, but it's frustrating as a fan who wants to enjoy the now.
 
We've played 4 through balls in the league this season. 4, through 10 games. Woolwich have something like 33. There is no excuse for that, nada.

We really can't moan about the strikers when they never get the fucking ball. Or if they do, it's pulling down a hoof ball out of the air, or have to drop very deep to get it. They're not being presented with nearly enough chances to be criticised.

We have absolutely no attacking strategy other than cross the ball. If teams limit corners and crosses against us, they have the easiest day ever.

Who’s going to play those passes though?

We don’t have footballers, we have runners and athletes.
 

View: https://youtu.be/Gg6VF_dJbKc?si=M3nZcl28BVSUWQZ0

When he's not spitting at kids in cars he's spitting facts about spurs


These were all things me and my mate were talking about during the game. The players are fucking cowards, I’m sorry but throughout that no matter the tactics they are hiding from the ball. If a couple of idiots in the stands can see it, carragher can see it, then you know Frank can. It’s why I’ve been slagging them off since the match. They don’t have the bottle for it for whatever reason. Fucking soft cunts. I was hoping it will be different tonight when I’ve got to trek to the stadium but I’m thinking it will be more of the same. We’ve got a real problem lads.
 
I doubt Frank would be setting the team up to play the way we currently are if we had a Kane/Son up top.
If/when we get some real quality up top I think we will see a different Thomas Frank Spurs!
 
These were all things me and my mate were talking about during the game. The players are fucking cowards, I’m sorry but throughout that no matter the tactics they are hiding from the ball. If a couple of idiots in the stands can see it, carragher can see it, then you know Frank can. It’s why I’ve been slagging them off since the match. They don’t have the bottle for it for whatever reason. Fucking soft cunts. I was hoping it will be different tonight when I’ve got to trek to the stadium but I’m thinking it will be more of the same. We’ve got a real problem lads.
I'm not an idiot in the stands (respect to you), I'm an idiot who sits on the sofa watching all our games live and I agree with you.
The only answer I can think of is because our back line and mid-field are all to aware that we don't have a decent target man/men making the right movement for them to hit/find and our wide men rarely beats their man.
This makes the mid-field ponderous on the ball, this then sees them getting closed down to easily, which more often than not sees us losing possession or them passing backwards, which make them look like bottlers.

And the long ball is hit in hope we win it or the second ball from it and someone? gets on the end of it!

Just my theory!
 

View: https://youtu.be/Gg6VF_dJbKc?si=M3nZcl28BVSUWQZ0

When he's not spitting at kids in cars he's spitting facts about spurs

He's right about Palhinha, who should be used more wisely because he's not a good footballer in possession. It's all very well trying to make the team difficult to score against but we need to be able to progress the ball forward.

Maybe when Bissouma is back fit we can see if he's going to be better at that, maybe he and Gray.
 
He's right about Palhinha, who should be used more wisely because he's not a good footballer in possession. It's all very well trying to make the team difficult to score against but we need to be able to progress the ball forward.

Maybe when Bissouma is back fit we can see if he's going to be better at that, maybe he and Gray.
Carragher is another one who likes sticking the boot in on us along with his pal redknapp. Would sky allow someone like dawson on MNF disect liverpools pisspoor play recently losing 4 in a row. Reality is sky allow the pundits to diss us on tv along with that low IQ prick merson.
 
Back
Top