• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Thomas Frank

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Are you Frank Out or In?


  • Total voters
    623
I never once claimed Ange lost the dressing room. He never did! The players ran for every ball under ange and more often than not risked injury or went against medical advice to play for ange.

This is not the case here. The players are not behind Frank at all.

I don't think they're behind the style of play that's for sure!

But I think the notion of saying the win had nothing to do with the manager is frankly rollocks, sorry, that's not how football works.
 
Is it? Is that what Woolwich have done with Arteta? Did they sack him after two 8th place finishes?

Did Bournemouth sack Iraola after not winning a league game in his first 10 games?

If you keep sacking managers then why would any decent manager come here? What time frame do you give them?
Using one example out of the other hundreds is hilarious.

Southgate got England to a Euro final, world cup semi final, Di Matteo won a CL, Ange won an EL. Hell, Slot won the league last year. Do I think they're great managers, no. Arteta has failed spectacularly with that squad he has, and if he wins it's because they have two top players in every position, while City are going through a rebuild as are Liverpool.

The days of Ferguson's and Wenger's are over. Managers come and go. Villa hired managers quicker than we did til they found the one that good for them, Chelsea, Bournemouth, Palace, Bayern. Real Madrid essentially forced Ancelotti out because it was stagnating. If Iraola played the football that Frank plays here, he's absolutely have been sacked and rightfully so. They were in diffs, he came in mid season and rescued them from going down, there were clearly signs he was getting them going, but devoid of confidence and no time to implemt his system always would make it slower. Wild comparison. Frank has had a preseason ~£200m and two loanees of players he wanted and we're horrible, and have been all season, and it doesn't look like getting better at all.

But nah, we'll just be shite because we hired the wrong guy and we'll go with it. The pro Frank arguments are getting more ridiculous by the day.
 
Even if we got Glasner, we don't have the patience amongst our fans to let him get his ways across. If he struggled in his first 6 months the same fans would be calling for his head and bemoaning the Ange sacking, crying back for Poch and spunking over Conte again.. It's a boring, repetitive cycle which is part of the problem.

That's true but Glasner has done more with Palace than Frank ever did with Brentford (as well as he did tbf)

My point is it's obvious Glasner has a higher ceiling as a coach, and perhaps that does buy him more patience.

I honestly think he'd be a great fit for the Club given time.

Frank never felt right. But he definitely gets time to turn this around but he needs to start showing he has the balls for the job but I'm not overly confident that he does.
 
Yesterday was painful. I'm on the fence about Frank now. He seems to be in survival mode at Spurs. He inherited a mess of a squad but practically freezing out the likes of Bergvall, Gray or Tel is not the way forward. Unless it all changes 'when he gets his injured players back' ... fuck, we've been there before 🫣
 
Even if we got Glasner, we don't have the patience amongst our fans to let him get his ways across. If he struggled in his first 6 months the same fans would be calling for his head and bemoaning the Ange sacking, crying back for Poch and spunking over Conte again.. It's a boring, repetitive cycle which is part of the problem.
Catch a grip. You know that's not true. Would we be watching the worst coward ball ever seen? No, we wouldn't. Large majority of us would be happy and willing to give him time as he plays the right type of football. Could it fail, of course it could, but we'd certainly be delighted as a fan base with an appointment like that.

The vast, middle ground between Ange and Frank is where we should be where we look at managers.
 
I don't think they're behind the style of play that's for sure!

But I think the notion of saying the win had nothing to do with the manager is frankly rollocks, sorry, that's not how football works.
Just my opinion but I don't think Frank gave VDV and Romero the licence to make those lung bursting runs for the 3rd and 4th goals against Copenhagen when down to 10 men.

Maybe I'm doing Frank a complete disservice and he coached the team to create space so that our centre backs could drive forward with the ball and that was our plan when down to 10 men.

To me if felt like VDV and Romero went rogue and Frank could only sit back and watch it work out.
 
Difference is Chelsea and Man U go again. They don't shit themselves cause they got burnt once or twice. Chelsea are absorbing 300k a week for a player not even in their squad and training with the reserves. That contract runs out in 2027... hasn't stopped them going big and often this summer and they will do the same next summer. For the record our revenue stream is higher than theirs. They don't even have a shirt sponsor.

Hows that working out for Man Utd?

As for Chelsea, I'm not sure what your point is? They're being pumped full of debt by a faceless organisation and are a mess
 
Oh we are angry alright. I'm still fucking livid this morning.

Why are we directing everything at the geezer who stands on the touchline though, particularly when most of us without the benefit of hindsight would probably have set up the exact same way yesterday.

I'ts mostly the spineless players that can't motivate themselves to fight like hell in a NLD that I'm directing my ire at.

We could have had any manager in the world in the dugout yesterday and we would have got tonked and bullied purely because they didn't show any fight or bottle at all as a collective.

Get what you're saying but the buck always stops with the manager.

I mean it was the same against Chelsea. Couldn't blame the crowd this time.

They should be all singing off the same page.

We don't look like a team who's going to fight for every second ball and it's those differences that make the difference.
 
Palhinha has been good for us- but he is a player that really demands to be played as a deep CDM in a 4-3-3. In any sort of an 8-esque role he looks awkward to me. Thomas' bigger flaw so far though has been his stubborn commitment to Bentancur, even in the face of better options like Sarr or Bergvall.
Bentancur has been OK when he is not playing with Palhinha. One of them is OK, just not together.

Gray and Bergvall really need to start getting minutes now they are fit again imo.
 
It seems that Thomas Frank is always more worried about what the opposition MIGHT do as opposed to what we COULD do. This has to change now or his position will be in serious jeopardy sooner rather than later.
 
Who the hell rates these players? If you don't think the manager has anything to do with this, then, wow.
Oh don’t get me wrong I’m not impressed at all from what I’ve seen from Frank so far, but the majority of this forum were actually happy about giving Bentencur a new contract . That’s the level that we are content with. That’s without getting into porro, undogie , Danso, etc etc. bang average shite
 
Drop them.

Make them fear the consequences of poor performances.

Just play the eager, hungry kids.

Not playing loses them appearance fees, risks international places and possibly sponsorships and what have you.

People in workplaces tend to work hard because they either have that integrity within themselves or they fear the repercussions. If option 1 doesn’t work or isn’t there, you have to enforce option 2.
The problem is to play eager hungry kids, you need to be fearless.

Frank’s a tactical p*ssy at the end of the day. His first thought isn’t how he can hurt the opposition in open play.

Defensive managers just do not work at Spurs.
 
Just my opinion but I don't think Frank gave VDV and Romero the licence to make those lung bursting runs for the 3rd and 4th goals against Copenhagen when down to 10 men.

Maybe I'm doing Frank a complete disservice and he coached the team to create space so that our centre backs could drive forward with the ball and that was our plan when down to 10 men.

To me if felt like VDV and Romero went rogue and Frank could only sit back and watch it work out.

If that was the case then our players would be doing that every match, not just that one - why didn't you see the players abandon tactics yesterday in that case?

Again this isn't how football works, players don't just pick and choose whether they want to defy the manager or not.
 
We lost all our world class players (or kept them long enough to decline). We let Poch's side rot by replacing the midfield with Winks and Sissoko.

Then we gradually filled our squad with mid-table players like Richy, Odobert, Johnson, Vicario and Tel. Maybe even Palhinha and Bentancur if I'm being harsh.

This is the main reason we are where we are. Frank is just the next scapegoat.
 
Oh I expected us to get dicked long before the game for sure.

But not because Frank is the manager.

I expected the players bollox to shrivel and to turn and up and get bullied like we did at Newcastle and at home to Chelsea, only worse as Woolwich are a better side.

Doesn't change the fact that our best route to knicking a point was to go with a 5 and be hard to break down. And if the players had the nads to execute the plan and actually fight then we might have got something.

See Sunderland the other week.
It was 100% because of the manager... how you think he has no ownership of that game is madness.
 
Back
Top