• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Thomas Frank

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Are you Frank Out or In?


  • Total voters
    623
It's been said before but we really needed to back Conte. I know he was a headcase, but he was a winner. I kinda miss his energy on the sidelines.

He wanted Bastoni, and got Longlet. No wonder he went nuts!
We dropped the ball with him.

The only professional manager we had after Pochettino. Mourinho was past his prime and an absolutely delusional appoitment by Levy. Not sure how he thought that was the right choice to make back then to be honest, with all the history.

Others dont need mentioning.
 
We dropped the ball with him.

The only professional manager we had after Pochettino. Mourinho was past his prime and an absolutely delusional appoitment by Levy. Not sure how he thought that was the right choice to make back then to be honest, with all the history.

Others dont need mentioning.

He was also hit by the Tottenham curse. Everything that could go wrong did go wrong in that second season - the effect of the death of one of his closest assistants cannot be overstated.
 
That's the very first goal that we conceded this season



And that's the most recent one



When I saw this against Sunderland a few days ago..



..I was reminded of this that took place in mid-October apparently



Another instance from the same day back in mid-October. Not very dissimilar to the one Semenyo scored is it?



..Also similar



Kept a clean sheet against Palace, but not without allowing chances like this



In case you think we've been ridiculously unlucky with those "belters" ,other teams also concede similar goals when they defend these shots in a similar highly conservative and lethargic manner. Two from the same game





By contrast, these from yesterday are much better; although the first one where Palhinha only tiptoes towards the attacker instead of rushing at him is still not ideal



-------​
For someone who's quite risk averse with his team's passing and movement, Frank is surely taking a huge risk with these target practice shots. Players at this level will bury these at a rate high enough to cause some serious headache, as evidenced by Villa and Bournemouth games in particular where those goals were the main culprit behind the losses.

This is not working.
 
You guys do realize Frank is staying or should I be worried? When was the last time the club has made a sustainable and logical decision?

We flogged off Johnson without having anybody lined up for him for some quick cash. A top club does this the other way around.

Like so many things it is bullshit after bullshit.
 
I think if we have to pay off Frank and his staff, it's not a lump sum, they get it over the course of the contract they had. So it's already money accounted for I assume. It's their wages.

Maybe this isn't correct but that's how I understand these things work.
 
For someone who's quite risk averse with his team's passing and movement, Frank is surely taking a huge risk with these target practice shots. Players at this level will bury these at a rate high enough to cause some serious headache, as evidenced by Villa and Bournemouth games in particular where those goals were the main culprit behind the losses.

This is not working.

This is the point for me, its by design (or lack of) - its structural far more than its the players

Which is, by no means, to absolve the players as well - they are underperforming - but I feel like they are playing with a handicap
 
dont want Ange back, I dont look back on him wistfully, nothing of the sort - but when I compare last season to this - I do think Ange had much greater conviction, did genuinely set us up to try and win games, did genuinely want attacking, goals, spectacle...

And Frank to me is the opposite

Ossie Ardiles style though isn't it - we finished quite low because we attempting to simply outscore the opposition. That isn't setting out to try and win games - that was never done, realistically. We set out to attack expecting to win, which was the arrogance that had us still attacking when we could have been more pragmatic.

e.g 1-1 with two men down, 23 mins left to play against a bitter rival, having been unbeaten and top of the league
(MW11 - 23/24)

Screenshot-2023-11-07-at-12.02.05-AM.png


That was the game that I think every other PL club clocked on to and made us predictable idiots.

Spectacle for the neutral maybe, but I don't believe spurs fans walked away from the games like that happy once the reality set in. It was of course short lived, because we ended up playing like that without the attacking part later on.
 
Yeah I see that get brought up a lot. Frank had access all season to Johnson who scored 20 goals under ange S1.
Don't think solanke, kulu or son would offer anything under this Frank team that the replacements haven't
Really, tactics just not set up for it.

Would Ange get more goals and assist out of xavi, muani, Kudus .....I'm gonna say most likely
Let’s stick to the facts, Johnson scored 5 goals under Season One Ange.
 
I would repeat, size 72, bold, underline - my position isn't defending the current manager, but is quashing the idea that the ones that came before were all that much better.


The year is 2076. Woolwich have won the Woolwich World Champion of Woolwich Cup for the 35th year in a row. Spurs fans are kept in pus-filled pods, their electrical energy used to power the Mikel Arteta AI Super Robot which now controls the Matrix.

But still CJJ CJJ continues his dogged quest to lecture Spurs fans that, actually, things were never really much better...
 
He was also hit by the Tottenham curse. Everything that could go wrong did go wrong in that second season - the effect of the death of one of his closest assistants cannot be overstated.
Yeah I remember, it was unfortunate but the club should have backed him at that moment. He lashed out, it got emotional, performances were alright though all things considered. In no way is it comparable with today.

The squad just also regressed in quality and character over these past few years. It would be nice to see a few youngsters and more identification again. I can accept mid-table, not with this squad however. These are supposed to be experienced internationals.
 
That's the very first goal that we conceded this season

By1-1A.gif


And that's the most recent one

t4rfS9.gif


When I saw this against Sunderland a few days ago..

pWZ2qt.gif


..I was reminded of this that took place in mid-October apparently

nuaLgI.gif


Another instance from the same day back in mid-October. Not very dissimilar to the one Semenyo scored is it?

J0q3uC.gif


..Also similar

SgHCU8.gif


Kept a clean sheet against Palace, but not without allowing chances like this

EJ2pex.gif


In case you think we've been ridiculously unlucky with those "belters" ,other teams also concede similar goals when they defend these shots in a similar highly conservative and lethargic manner. Two from the same game

vQ90Nr.gif


aL_ZL7.gif


By contrast, these from yesterday are much better; although the first one where Palhinha only tiptoes towards the attacker instead of rushing at him is still not ideal

vAwSi9.gif


-------​
For someone who's quite risk averse with his team's passing and movement, Frank is surely taking a huge risk with these target practice shots. Players at this level will bury these at a rate high enough to cause some serious headache, as evidenced by Villa and Bournemouth games in particular where those goals were the main culprit behind the losses.

This is not working.

This is Ange’s back post cross.

Both situations where opponents have identified a structural weakness in the system and repeatedly exploited it.
 
Ossie Ardiles style though isn't it - we finished quite low because we attempting to simply outscore the opposition. That isn't setting out to try and win games - that was never done, realistically. We set out to attack expecting to win, which was the arrogance that had us still attacking when we could have been more pragmatic.

e.g 1-1 with two men down, 23 mins left to play against a bitter rival, having been unbeaten and top of the league
(MW11 - 23/24)

Screenshot-2023-11-07-at-12.02.05-AM.png


That was the game that I think every other PL club clocked on to and made us predictable idiots.

Spectacle for the neutral maybe, but I don't believe spurs fans walked away from the games like that happy once the reality set in. It was of course short lived, because we ended up playing like that without the attacking part later on.


I think we did set out to win games. I think that was the intent, 100%.

That we DIDNT win games is secondary.

It doesnt evidence we didnt set up to win, it evidences we werent good enough to win.

I think Ange had much the right intentions, ambitions etc.

I think Ange also was completely out of his depth and found out.

And youre right - Chelsea was a turning point Im almost certain - FOUND OUT from there on.

I dont relate Ange to Frank at all, except to make the comparison in intention, thats it.

I think theyre both out of their depth and not good enough, I certainly dont want either managing the club.

But that comparison - Ange talked a big game, goals, attacking, front foot - and he actually went for it (and failed)
Frank talked a big game - "Its a risk to not take a risk" (remember that?) - but hasnt gone for it, hes been the opposite. Negative, defensive, scared of the ball - and he has also failed.
 
I think if we have to pay off Frank and his staff, it's not a lump sum, they get it over the course of the contract they had. So it's already money accounted for I assume. It's their wages.

Maybe this isn't correct but that's how I understand these things work.
Depends on the contract.

I think more often than not they're put on gardening leave and paid until they find another job.
 
I'm so disappointed with TF it's unreal. I really liked him at Brentford and thought he would be able to up his game, spread his managerial wings, play around with the squad to get the perfect balance for each game, but I've seen virtually none of that. All I really see is almost a nervousness to fail which is, in itself, a recipe for failure. I think everyone would love to see him having a go, getting the players to have a go and trust their own talents but no , just some fairly dull football, the odd part of the odd game aside. I was always in the "give them time" camp but I just can't see a time when there will be any improvement, even when we get Dom or Kulu back. Quite looking forward to his tenure being over now to be honest and I hate that feeling.
 
I wonder how much the money is even an issue, it always materialises when it suits them.

Also, we can put him on a gardening leave sort of situation (we've done before) and just pay wages until he gets a new job = cheaper



I get this, and I expect its true - but there comes a point where continuing with Frank despite the onfield shambles also makes them look wrong. Theres a point where all they can do to save face is pull the trigger.



Managers always have injuries to contest with, the best ones cope. I can see it as a contributor for poor performances but not to the level we're seeing (IMO)




There always is. Only real question is if they are right for the job or not - and given the way the clubs run I have to say while I think Frank has to go - when I see that announcement itll fill me with trepidation as well

I think if any announcement were made re: Frank, it would also require news at the same time of an interim or new appointment.

That might explain the seemingl lack of noise.

That, or carry on, we believe in you, and January signings are on their way.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top