Kane is walking fine here, I say start him against Chelsea!
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Kane is walking fine here, I say start him against Chelsea!
Nope, that's why i said they came to see Sonny. But like Jesus, i'm not bothered how they came to follow, just that they do.
Changed my mind , I say start him against Chelsea , they have a team full of youngsters any way, also start Lamela and Ndombele as well
Who would’ve thought a squad without a proper number nine would back fire? :mourbringit:
Yeah it is annoying, but when ex pros make comments on second rate pay per view TV aimed at the US market my only question is whether I should start listening or stop picking my nose.
It's becoming a trend started by Gary Nev.:
"We always wore our socks higher up the leg in our day"
"Can't believe he's not got his shinpads on before kick off. Substitutes have no excuse"
"If the tea were cold at half time, Sir Alex would have taken her out and shot her under the Stretford. There's literally bodies piled up out there"
Can't hear you f*cks. Too busy with my nose hair.
We lost Kane SEVEN weeks ago. Levy had FOUR weeks to rectify the situation.
I seem to remember you and others who have since rowed back on their original standpoint saying mid January that it would be unforgiveable if we didn't bring in a striker in the transfer window.
At what point did it turn out to be just bad luck, hey-ho?
Yeah, but those hands aren't behind their backs so they have an advantage over most. --Levy logic.Poch & Jose trying to navigate a Spurs team through Europe
Everyone apart from Stevie Wonder. Both of them.
Exactly. That's why I'm all in for giving time to players that can be top tier in Europe, and very reluctant to pushing likes of Aurier. Still, Winks, Davies can be useful squad players, but even if we are out of our problems and set things running as we want, Aurier is going to be weak spot. Some bad decisions, some mistouches and the trouble is there, even if he can contribute to our game, like today.
A striker that hasn't played is one more striker then we had on the fucking pitch. Not ready? Well tough. Seriously we should have stuck him on at least late in the game. What else have we fucking got
They played us off the park mate.
I've no problem with us sitting deep on the edge of our box and letting them take pot shots from 25yrds, but all their shots were from good positions in our own box. We aren't even capable of putting 11 men behind the ball without conceding shots at will from dangerous positions.
Our tactics are one of praying that the other side don't take their chances.
That's a birthing joke that happens during prolonged delivery for our Jaffa colleagues out there.
I guess... Man City? :mourbringit:
When our manager's get fucked in the arse every transfer window what do you expect?
Not sure if I'm getting the point I'm making across... I'm talking about losing Kane & Son is a killer blow, not just Kane.
I said at the time and I stand by it that we should have signed a striker, it just made sense to but not a short term solution for an over inflated fee. If offered Willian Jose for £25m and having £25m less for a more long term option to utilise I would rather we had waited and used that money to do so. Obviously losing Son means it's a risk that has massively backfired but I understand why the club did so, it's just blown up in our faces.
Yes we should have signed someone but with Bergwijn coming in I saw the need as less important than it was early doors in the window. Obviously with hindsight my view has altered with Sonny now done but as I said Bill it is what it is.
Even Mark Twain would've struggled in HTML
Look who was bought by Barca and UTD. There was simply no reasonable 9 to buy. Piątek and this Spanish one weren't great options. I got on hype train during window, but honestly, bench warmer from La Liga side?
Imagine this....
You're the CEO of a big production company. You have a chance of securing a number of major contracts. Then your most important piece of machinery breaks down. Your back-up plan isn't a replacement piece of machinery but a patch, another machine which you can take from somewhere else and use as a stand-in.
But fear not. There's a window of opportunity in which you can get a substitute machine which will probably do a decent job. However, you fail to do so because the fair price that that supplier is asking for is above the cut-price you won't go over. So you're entirely reliant on a stand-in machine which could be doing a better job elsewhere. And of course, there's always the very real risk that this stand-in might have mechanical problems at some point.
Which it then does.
How do you think your shareholders would view your stewardship of this situation, your risk assessment and mitigation skills?
Obviously didn't bring his boots tonight. WTF Attitude?
#BadNDombeleInfluenceInTheDressingRoomAndCakeShop.