• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Match Tottenham Hotspur vs Millwall FA CUP

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Thats why I said football is illogical, and thankfully.

I "hate gooners"......but in real life, there must be some of their fans I prefer as people to some Spurs fans. Id rather live next to a decent gooner than a Spurs supporting nonce.
You cant compare football tribalness with real life in that way.

Fair enough.

But must admit, I am a bit tired of the tribalism these days. Very tedious.
 
To be fair to us, that turn out (30,000) was our lowest ever at Wembley because tickets were restricted to season ticket holders and members, plus a guest due to what happened v Wigan.

And we weren't fighting amongst ourselves this time, the fights were with Barnsley - who gave as good as they got.

The occasion we fought each other was v Wigan in the FA Cup Semi-Final of 2013. When two rival families happened to bump into each other & disputes over drug deals etc. spilled out into the stadium. This happened before in 2005 when rival families battled it out in Hungary. I don't know what north London is like, but people in south London see themselves very much part of their own 'manor' - so there has always been a rivalry between Wall fans from Bermondsey, those from Peckham, or Camberwell, Walworth, Deptford etc.

I do recall Spurs fans fighting each other at a League Cup Final in the 1990s/early 200s was it? That may have been the same thing. Also, there was trouble with Leicester City fans when some Spurs got in their end, wasn't there.

Not that you care, but before that Wigan fight saw our tickets restricted for the Barnsley Play-Off Final, our followings at Wembley before the restrictions were 49,500 v Wigan in Auto-Windscreens Cup, 49,661 v Scunthorpe United for League One PO-Final, 44,500 v Swindon Town for League One PO-Final and 40,000 for Wigan Athletic in FA Cup Semi-Final.

I do find it frustrating that our reputation conceals the many historic things about Millwall FC. That is to say, that yes we are now a small club, but those big turn-outs at Wembley were not fans of Chelsea, Woolwich etc. coming along for a fun family day out, like Leyton Orient would get, but the residue of Millwall's past.

Before the docks closed Millwall were one of best supported clubs in England. The club were the pioneers of professional football in London & the south. But, and I am sure you will have empathy for this, were stabbed in the back by Woolwich.

It was Millwall who were the shinning light of football in the south before the turn of the century - earning the nickname 'Lions of the South', which replaced the 'Dockers', for our ability to compete and beat the big northern and midlands giants. This inspired us to set-up the Southern League, which Woolwich helped with. Yet, it was Millwall who were offered a place in the FA football league as the south's first ever representative, having won the first two Southern League titles & showed their class in reaching the FA Cup Semi-Finals twice. However, we turned down the offer, wanting to stay loyal to our southern brothers & felt our league was every bit as good anyway - which Spurs proved by winning the FA Cup.

Yet, sneaky little Woolwich had other plans. They were going to go behind the Southern League's back & join up to the Football League, plus move to a bigger & better area....hmmm, where did that end up being?

By not joining & staying loyal to the Southern League Millwall missed out on an opportunity to become one of English football's big clubs. Yet, crowds of 30-50,000 still turned up to roar the Lions on in the Third Division South & Second Division. The last hoorah perhaps was when 30,000 turned up for a Third Division game in the mid 1970s, the last time that many Dockers still had work and Millwall were the centre of their world.

Ever since the Docks closed and the area has been cleared Millwall have slumped to a loyal, but modest following of 8-12,000 on average. Yet, all the families of those Dockers, many who moved out to greater London, Kent, Surrey, Essex etc. will turn up for the big games still.

The club say that the majority of the 6,000 odd season ticket holders have SE London postcodes, so there is still that link to the area. It's just that they are scaffolders, scrap mental merchants, builders, cabbies, London underground workers, binmen now...not Dockers. And there aren't enough of them to see gates of 30,000 for Third tier football anymore.

Sorry for getting all serious, but this thread had got a bit serious (and silly). I like Spurs, and thought this sneering at small clubs was more of a Chelsea/Woolwich thing to do. Especially those backstabbers from Woolwich.
Great post
 
Agree with Tottenham Sean Tottenham Sean - will never happen. Their younger heads might see Spurs as their main rival but for their top table it is always Millwall.

Our animosity towards Wet Spam runs deep, a rivalry that dates back to when we played on the Isle of Dogs. In more recent times it has been well documented with the cup game in 2009 being high profile. What pisses off a lot of Wall supporters is the why they appear to get preferential treatment from the FA and the authorities, that cup game, three pitch invasions during the game, they got a silly fine as we did for not going on the pitch. They attack the team coach of Man Utd on their last game and nothing is done, if either of these occurred at the Den, people would be calling for closure. Wasn’t Tevez an illegal signing? And then the stadium…….don’t even need to talk about that.

Very unlikely that they would join up for Sunday.
 
[QUOTE="Lewis1885, post: 1176537, member: 9455"


As for west ham.... as you say, a gang on them set upon a bloke with his sons and stabbed him. Not sure they would be very welcome!![/QUOTE]
I use to work with the Brother in law of the fella that got stabbed.Wasn't it a case of West ham stewards sending him and his family down a road with some of theirs down?
 
You obviously weren't there! A whole variety of 'feelings' that day.

I was, and funny enough with a Spurs supporting mate. Had to wait ages to meet up with him after.

I tend to dislike clubs based on the games - cannot stand poxy Wigan. They have ruined a League Trophy Final, Play-Off game and FA Cup Semi-Final for us.

Yet, I quite like Wolverhampton Wanderers, despite being set upon there in the subway.

I meant it is not like we have had any influence on Spurs' footballing history! Unless a miracle happens on Sunday! :eriksenlol:
 
To be fair to us, that turn out (30,000) was our lowest ever at Wembley because tickets were restricted to season ticket holders and members, plus a guest due to what happened v Wigan.

And we weren't fighting amongst ourselves this time, the fights were with Barnsley - who gave as good as they got.

The occasion we fought each other was v Wigan in the FA Cup Semi-Final of 2013. When two rival families happened to bump into each other & disputes over drug deals etc. spilled out into the stadium. This happened before in 2005 when rival families battled it out in Hungary. I don't know what north London is like, but people in south London see themselves very much part of their own 'manor' - so there has always been a rivalry between Wall fans from Bermondsey, those from Peckham, or Camberwell, Walworth, Deptford etc.

I do recall Spurs fans fighting each other at a League Cup Final in the 1990s/early 200s was it? That may have been the same thing. Also, there was trouble with Leicester City fans when some Spurs got in their end, wasn't there.

Not that you care, but before that Wigan fight saw our tickets restricted for the Barnsley Play-Off Final, our followings at Wembley before the restrictions were 49,500 v Wigan in Auto-Windscreens Cup, 49,661 v Scunthorpe United for League One PO-Final, 44,500 v Swindon Town for League One PO-Final and 40,000 for Wigan Athletic in FA Cup Semi-Final.

I do find it frustrating that our reputation conceals the many historic things about Millwall FC. That is to say, that yes we are now a small club, but those big turn-outs at Wembley were not fans of Chelsea, Woolwich etc. coming along for a fun family day out, like Leyton Orient would get, but the residue of Millwall's past.

Before the docks closed Millwall were one of best supported clubs in England. The club were the pioneers of professional football in London & the south. But, and I am sure you will have empathy for this, were stabbed in the back by Woolwich.

It was Millwall who were the shinning light of football in the south before the turn of the century - earning the nickname 'Lions of the South', which replaced the 'Dockers', for our ability to compete and beat the big northern and midlands giants. This inspired us to set-up the Southern League, which Woolwich helped with. Yet, it was Millwall who were offered a place in the FA football league as the south's first ever representative, having won the first two Southern League titles & showed their class in reaching the FA Cup Semi-Finals twice. However, we turned down the offer, wanting to stay loyal to our southern brothers & felt our league was every bit as good anyway - which Spurs proved by winning the FA Cup.

Yet, sneaky little Woolwich had other plans. They were going to go behind the Southern League's back & join up to the Football League, plus move to a bigger & better area....hmmm, where did that end up being?

By not joining & staying loyal to the Southern League Millwall missed out on an opportunity to become one of English football's big clubs. Yet, crowds of 30-50,000 still turned up to roar the Lions on in the Third Division South & Second Division. The last hoorah perhaps was when 30,000 turned up for a Third Division game in the mid 1970s, the last time that many Dockers still had work and Millwall were the centre of their world.

Ever since the Docks closed and the area has been cleared Millwall have slumped to a loyal, but modest following of 8-12,000 on average. Yet, all the families of those Dockers, many who moved out to greater London, Kent, Surrey, Essex etc. will turn up for the big games still.

The club say that the majority of the 6,000 odd season ticket holders have SE London postcodes, so there is still that link to the area. It's just that they are scaffolders, scrap mental merchants, builders, cabbies, London underground workers, binmen now...not Dockers. And there aren't enough of them to see gates of 30,000 for Third tier football anymore.

Sorry for getting all serious, but this thread had got a bit serious (and silly). I like Spurs, and thought this sneering at small clubs was more of a Chelsea/Woolwich thing to do. Especially those backstabbers from Woolwich.
Good post.
I watched a video years ago about the history of Millwall,as you said very interesting and would surprise a few people.
Do you think you lost a lot of fans when people from the east end stopped following you?
I remember even up to the early 80s you still had a fair few from the isle of dogs, silvertown ,poplar .You don't get them anymore, not that i'm aware anyway.
EDIT.
I find most football clubs history's interesting as it goes.With the exception of Chelsea,who's history is incredibly boring.
 
Fair enough.

But must admit, I am a bit tired of the tribalism these days. Very tedious.

Its part of football as far as Im concerned....otherwise we're all just a bunch of happy clappers applauding the opposition when they score.

I like a tense, hostile atmosphere, and I like the anger and hatred when we play Woolwich and Chelsea.

I draw the line at kicking off over it, but its the one outlet in life (mine at least) where I dont have to be rational and sensible. I can be a twat, a hypocrite and scream things Id never dream of doing in "real life".
When the highs come, the lows go out the window.

Euphoria is nothing without blind passion, and for me blind passion comes with a dislike for anything that dislikes Spurs. On matchday, that could be any team, but some teams I just dislike regardless.
 
Two tickets (one in East Upper/J and West Lower) have just become available on the OS NOW!
Get 'em before they're gon.....
 
I agree with much of what you say and I am happy for you to join the discussion. What about Hull away though? Chucking big bits of metal at the hull fans is something I have not ever seen. It obviously went on in the 70s and 80s but it just seems so extreme for nowadays.
PS. I am aware we also have reputation hence why this fixture has garnered such a huge amount of interest from neutrals. Perhaps even more than a West Ham v Millwall game.

Hull City was a 'flag' day. It was a FA Cup 4th Round game involving a PL club, so a lot of the nationals picked up on it, especially as it was the same season as the West Ham trouble.

Millwall took 2,284 that day, including many of the 'serious' hooligans. Yes, it did get nasty. But again, no more so than the match the other night between Wolves & Birmingham City.

I don't want to sound like an apologists for the hooligans. However, I am an apologist for the club.

If Burnley played with a couple of miles of Fleet Street (and now Canary Wharf), instead miles away, it would be they with this 'scum of football' reputation, as they have been just as active as us over the years. Same with Cardiff City or Swansea City.

And while they have reputations, it is Millwall's location that has really cemented our place as number one trouble club. You may even bring up events like the Luton riot, yet that very year there was a death at a match between Birmingham City & Leeds United. At the actual match. But, because our game was beamed around the country it is us that people remember.

Success plays a part too. Or lack of. West Ham have every bit as 'interesting; hooligan past and present as us...yet, have a 'cheeky cockney' persona. The reason? A lot of reporters etc are West Ham fans. Many attracted to the club because of their 'sexy' sides of the 60s, 70s and 80s. The academy & all that nonsense.

Take Manchester United too. Their fans were a disgrace in Barcelona. On the rampage. However, they did win the most dramatic ever CL final, so that kinda stole the headlines.
 
Hull City was a 'flag' day. It was a FA Cup 4th Round game involving a PL club, so a lot of the nationals picked up on it, especially as it was the same season as the West Ham trouble.

Millwall took 2,284 that day, including many of the 'serious' hooligans. Yes, it did get nasty. But again, no more so than the match the other night between Wolves & Birmingham City.

I don't want to sound like an apologists for the hooligans. However, I am an apologist for the club.

If Burnley played with a couple of miles of Fleet Street (and now Canary Wharf), instead miles away, it would be they with this 'scum of football' reputation, as they have been just as active as us over the years. Same with Cardiff City or Swansea City.

And while they have reputations, it is Millwall's location that has really cemented our place as number one trouble club. You may even bring up events like the Luton riot, yet that very year there was a death at a match between Birmingham City & Leeds United. At the actual match. But, because our game was beamed around the country it is us that people remember.

Success plays a part too. Or lack of. West Ham have every bit as 'interesting; hooligan past and present as us...yet, have a 'cheeky cockney' persona. The reason? A lot of reporters etc are West Ham fans. Many attracted to the club because of their 'sexy' sides of the 60s, 70s and 80s. The academy & all that nonsense.

Take Manchester United too. Their fans were a disgrace in Barcelona. On the rampage. However, they did win the most dramatic ever CL final, so that kinda stole the headlines.

Sorry I dont buy the line that you get bad press because you are located near Fleet Street?

I accept that you defend your club, but you are still comparing it kicking off between Zulus and Yam Yams, a local and historical fixture of violance with 2000 odd hardcore Millwall hooligans trashing Hull for no reason.

The main point is, how many aggressive pitch invasions were there in the FA Cup the other week?

Its not just bad press is it
 
Its part of football as far as Im concerned....otherwise we're all just a bunch of happy clappers applauding the opposition when they score.

I like a tense, hostile atmosphere, and I like the anger and hatred when we play Woolwich and Chelsea.

I draw the line at kicking off over it, but its the one outlet in life (mine at least) where I dont have to be rational and sensible. I can be a twat, a hypocrite and scream things Id never dream of doing in "real life".
When the highs come, the lows go out the window.

Euphoria is nothing without blind passion, and for me blind passion comes with a dislike for anything that dislikes Spurs. On matchday, that could be any team, but some teams I just dislike regardless.

You describe the hostility we created at our home game to Leicester, who I've got nothing against other than they have those stupid clappy things at their home games.

Their young left back refused to take throw ins after his first two, said his hands hurt, this was reported in the press by our center forward. The noise levels were elevated further in the second half when we went down to ten men and seemed to increase the longer the game went on, the players responded.

Lots of clubs create noise or have songs that most fans join in with, this is different to hostility. Leicester made an official complaint about the abuse their team and fans received from moment they arrived until they left, Millwall responded by selling tickets for a tenner for the Tuesday night game as a thank you to the fans.

All of this (not physical violence) seems fair game to me, as a supporter make something that might make a difference to whats happening on the pitch.

I know this is a Spurs forum and a Spurs-Millwall thread, below is taken at face value as true, it is from the driver of the car for the match officials for our home play off game against Huddersfield and is about atmosphere.

< The Ref was very nervous when I got to the hotel to pick up the officials, none of em said a lot on the way in which is unusual. When we got to the ground he asked me "you will be outside when we come out won't you" I just laughed and promised him I would be.

Fuck me, when they came out after the game he was like a dog with 2 dicks, talk about excited! "steve that was fucking fantastic, I've never heard noise like it, I couldn't hear my own whistle!!

Then one of Lino's piped up, "how can 15/16000 people make that much noise?"

The journey back was a bit noisier, all recounting various things about the game and all 4 of em making phone calls to different people, and all more or less starting the call with "you should have heard it">
 
Hull City was a 'flag' day. It was a FA Cup 4th Round game The reason? A lot of reporters etc are West Ham fans. Many attracted to the club because of their 'sexy' sides of the 60s, 70s and 80s. The academy & all that nonsense.
.

this is spot on, used to amaze me how many of them there are.
they even have their own national radio station.
 
Sorry I dont buy the line that you get bad press because you are located near Fleet Street?

I accept that you defend your club, but you are still comparing it kicking off between Zulus and Yam Yams, a local and historical fixture of violance with 2000 odd hardcore Millwall hooligans trashing Hull for no reason.

The main point is, how many aggressive pitch invasions were there in the FA Cup the other week?

Its not just bad press is it

No, it's not just bad press. But the fact that Millwall ARE the bogeyman when it comes to football is.

I lived next to Bramall Lane for a few years and there was trouble most weeks. Quite serious for the visits of the likes of Cardiff City, Birmingham City, Bristol City and us. None of those are local or historical either. Yet, there was never anything about it in the national media.

Millwall has always been a rough & ready club, due to it being a docklands team. However, it was unlucky that when football hooliganism started becoming 'interesting' news it was the closest football ground to Fleet Street. It was an easy place to go to get an easy story.

And whereas the likes of Chelsea, Manchester United and West Ham were every bit as dodgy, at least they had good football sides to talk about too.

When the BBC decided to do an investigative piece on football violence they chose Millwall. It was a tad easier to reach than Burnley, and also generated good copy - an unfashionable club in a rough part of London. Manchester United, West Ham & Chelsea were too fashionable & probably had too many fans in the media to really go after.

That documentary then really set Millwall up as the hooligan club. We had nutters, so if you are a nutter from somewhere else, why not go and prove yourself against Millwall. Or if you are a nutter from SE London why not get down Millwall.The club has suffered ever since.

Furthermore, the club has never had any sustained success. So, why the likes of Chelsea, West Ham and even Birmingham City have seen their support diluted with new, middle-class families etc. Millwall never has.

If you are a middle-class family looking for a family experience from SE London you are going to go to Charlton or Palace. Or pay a bit more and go to Chelsea or Woolwich etc. Not The Den.

Our fanbase is almost like a relic. It is still mostly white, working class men. I would say our fanbase is closer to a northern club like Huddersfield than a club like Palace just 6 miles away in terms of demographic. In fact even those northern clubs have attracted more family support. Back in 1992, just before the PL, Millwall averaged around 11,000, the likes of Derby and Leicester around 15,000. Their gates shot up massively in the post Sky era - mostly families and new fans. Millwall still average 8-12,000. The same old scaffolders, binmen etc.

We have hardly been diluted at all.

Having said that, that pitch invasion v Leicester was not that aggressive. About 100 fans out 18,500 went directly over and gave them the wanker sign etc. Leicester fans threw some objects. Those Millwall fans returned them.

That scene would happen at most big city cubs in the same circumstances.

That is what I am saying. Millwall do have a hooligan element. But I refuse to accept it is bigger or more active than any other big city club. It just gets more media coverage for historical and geographic reasons than any other club now.

That is why we sing no one likes us... It is not aimed at opposition fans. It is a protest song at the media and FA.
 
Its part of football as far as Im concerned....otherwise we're all just a bunch of happy clappers applauding the opposition when they score.

I like a tense, hostile atmosphere, and I like the anger and hatred when we play Woolwich and Chelsea.

I draw the line at kicking off over it, but its the one outlet in life (mine at least) where I dont have to be rational and sensible. I can be a twat, a hypocrite and scream things Id never dream of doing in "real life".
When the highs come, the lows go out the window.

Euphoria is nothing without blind passion, and for me blind passion comes with a dislike for anything that dislikes Spurs. On matchday, that could be any team, but some teams I just dislike regardless.

I like it at the actual match. I just find all the online stuff tedious. Not aimed at you or this forum btw. Just in general.
 
Back
Top