I know what position he was supposed to be filling. He wasn't given anything to do all night and he still managed to look worse than Charlie Adam.He played as a HOLDING MID, he performed in this role, his job was to be the deepest player on the pitch, deeper than Dier!! His performed in this role, covering Aurier whilst he attacked, he linked with Aurier (mostly) which allowed Aurier to get forward. He misplaced ONE pass all night, made all his tackles, and re-circulated the ball (as is request by all our DM’s when performing that role). Dier missplaced more passes who was also playing DM.
If he was playing in goal would you be starting him for not getting behind the defensive block of WH? Or would you expect him to remain between the posts?
I'm not complaining that he didn't take on and beat players, or that he didn't score or carve out chances.
I'm pointing out that everything he did when he was on the ball was second or third division standard. To be fair to the guy, I think he performs better under pressure, but even then it's always rough as old boots.
I don't have favourite footballers - I'm not a 14 year old. I can see when players can perform and when they don't however.
Finally, I am not blaming him for the fact that we didn't win, simply pointing out the paucity of his performance.