Hasn’t ruined football. It’s exposed the clowns that do ruin football and make it hard for grassroots officials and administrators to be as respected as they should be.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Yep they can still pick and choose who to give the leeway to. ie scum and the dippersI prefer there being a bit of leeway for the attacker.
But, IMO, it' still too inconsistent, pointing to bias or corruption.
Doesn't.Offside is the only place where VAR works well. But there is no way to give the attacker the advantage or leeway. Its binary and will never fix the problem of a player "only" being a toe nail offside. Even the thing with "clear and obvious" and how much time it takes for the VAR referee is a bit tough to get right.
I dont disagree with you here. Not at all. And i am of the opinion that VAR has ruined a huge part of the game. Red cards, penaltys and goals in general. They are very inconsistent and often just dont make sense.Doesn't.
They check it to the millimeter, spend too long checking and still manage to be scarily inconsistent.
It's sucked the joy out of watching live football. You now know, especially if you're a Spurs fan, before this you celebrate a goal, it's going to be checked.
And they're actively looking for a way to rule the goal out as refs are, by the very genetics, little hitler bellends
Hasn’t ruined football. It’s exposed the clowns that do ruin football and make it hard for grassroots officials and administrators to be as respected as they should be.
The latest inconsistency is deciding who is or isn't interfering with play.I dont disagree with you here. Not at all. And i am of the opinion that VAR has ruined a huge part of the game. Red cards, penaltys and goals in general. They are very inconsistent and often just dont make sense.
But i would say the offside callings are pretty consistent. If i remember it correctly, it was the offside which was the biggest problem before VAR and now there are not that many wrong offside calls.
As a match going supporter I no longer properly celebrate the most joyous and important moment of any game, ie when Tottenham score a goal. So has VAR ruined live football as a spectacle? One million percent it has, absolutely, totally, irreparably.
The worst thing to ever happen to football. It should be binned entirely ( aside from goal line technology) COYS.
There's always some new addition that they fiddle with to try and fix it. Referees weren't initially going to go to the monitor.. But that in their heads was going to be the change that fixed VAR. So refs started going to the monitor. Then it became, "well the big issue with VAR is that the fans need to know whats going on.. Thats the only problem with it and if we sort that out, then it'll be fixed".. So the "checking possible ...." was put on the screen.. Then it was "that the referee needs to be miced up so he can explain his decision.. That'll make things so much clearer",This. It is shit. It has 100% led to worse games of football too. Players just cant commit as much as they used to.
Yes that has caused a lot of controversies. Apparantly a player was not ruled offside in a similar situation last night in the chelsea - Woolwich match. I'm not a fan of VAR and i think it has ruined a big part of the game.The latest inconsistency is deciding who is or isn't interfering with play.
Haaland last night was ruled to have been, but others won't.
There was talk about VAR decided corners to stop this.One thing i dont like no matter what is how much time it takes. And the situations where a team gets a corner or freekick from an offside position and going on to score.
Just seen United escape a blatant red card after VAR deemed the ref was right with a yellow.
Interesting all the attention (what little there was) was on a feint handball. In the same passage of play, Xavi was pushed over and I've yet to see even a mention of it.I think there's something dodgy going on.
Ref watch have decided to not talk about the spammers blatant handball decision. I bet they have heard something weird in the Comms and are trying to not highlight this incident.
On the stream i was watching the game on they said it was only a slight push so that must make it ok.Interesting all the attention (what little there was) was on a feint handball. In the same passage of play, Xavi was pushed over and I've yet to see even a mention of it.
On MOTD you can see him go down, but there was no mention of it and no replay whatsoever.